120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37725734)
1. Detection of Electrically Evoked Auditory Steady-State Responses in Cochlear-Implant Recipients With a System Identification Based Method.
Schott J; Gransier R; Wouters J; Moonen M
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2024 Mar; 71(3):738-749. PubMed ID: 37725734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Independent component analysis for cochlear implant artifacts attenuation from electrically evoked auditory steady-state response measurements.
Deprez H; Gransier R; Hofmann M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J; Moonen M
J Neural Eng; 2018 Feb; 15(1):016006. PubMed ID: 29211684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users: Effect of modulation frequency and stimulation artifacts.
Gransier R; Deprez H; Hofmann M; Moonen M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():149-160. PubMed ID: 26994660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of an artifact reduction strategy for electrically evoked auditory steady-state responses: Simulations and measurements.
Bahmer A; Pieper S; Baumann U
J Neurosci Methods; 2018 Feb; 296():57-68. PubMed ID: 29291927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electrophysiological assessment of temporal envelope processing in cochlear implant users.
Gransier R; Carlyon RP; Wouters J
Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):15406. PubMed ID: 32958791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Template Subtraction to Remove CI Stimulation Artifacts in Auditory Steady-State Responses in CI Subjects.
Deprez H; Gransier R; Hofmann M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J; Moonen M
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 Aug; 25(8):1322-1331. PubMed ID: 27810831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrically evoked auditory steady state responses in cochlear implant users.
Hofmann M; Wouters J
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2010 Jun; 11(2):267-82. PubMed ID: 20033246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved electrically evoked auditory steady-state response thresholds in humans.
Hofmann M; Wouters J
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Aug; 13(4):573-89. PubMed ID: 22569837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of analysis window on 40-Hz auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users.
David W; Verwaerde E; Gransier R; Wouters J
Hear Res; 2023 Oct; 438():108882. PubMed ID: 37688847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recording EEG in cochlear implant users: Guidelines for experimental design and data analysis for optimizing signal quality and minimizing artifacts.
Intartaglia B; Zeitnouni AG; Lehmann A
J Neurosci Methods; 2022 Jun; 375():109592. PubMed ID: 35367234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Auditory steady state responses and cochlear implants: Modeling the artifact-response mixture in the perspective of denoising.
Mina F; Attina V; Duroc Y; Veuillet E; Truy E; Thai-Van H
PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174462. PubMed ID: 28350887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cochlear implant artifact attenuation in late auditory evoked potentials: a single channel approach.
Mc Laughlin M; Lopez Valdes A; Reilly RB; Zeng FG
Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():84-95. PubMed ID: 23727626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing temporal modulation sensitivity using electrically evoked auditory steady state responses.
Luke R; Van Deun L; Hofmann M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 324():37-45. PubMed ID: 25746913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A novel method for device-related electroencephalography artifact suppression to explore cochlear implant-related cortical changes in single-sided deafness.
Kim K; Punte AK; Mertens G; Van de Heyning P; Park KJ; Choi H; Choi JW; Song JJ
J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Nov; 255():22-8. PubMed ID: 26231621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Toward Automated Cochlear Implant Fitting Procedures Based on Event-Related Potentials.
Finke M; Billinger M; Büchner A
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):e118-e127. PubMed ID: 27787394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Towards single-trial classification of invasively recorded auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant users.
Bauernfeind G; Teschner MJ; Wriessnegger SC; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Haumann S
J Neural Eng; 2022 Mar; 19(2):. PubMed ID: 35189612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Independent component analysis for auditory evoked potentials and cochlear implant artifact estimation.
Castañeda-Villa N; James CJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Feb; 58(2):348-54. PubMed ID: 20813628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimization of cochlear implant artifact in cortical auditory evoked potentials in children.
Bakhos D; Roux S; Robier A; Bonnet-Brilhault F; Lescanne E; Bruneau N
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Nov; 76(11):1627-32. PubMed ID: 22910837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Free-Field Cortical Steady-State Evoked Potentials in Cochlear Implant Users.
Alemi R; Nozaradan S; Lehmann A
Brain Topogr; 2021 Sep; 34(5):664-680. PubMed ID: 34185222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Semi-automatic attenuation of cochlear implant artifacts for the evaluation of late auditory evoked potentials.
Viola FC; De Vos M; Hine J; Sandmann P; Bleeck S; Eyles J; Debener S
Hear Res; 2012 Feb; 284(1-2):6-15. PubMed ID: 22234161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
