139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37725933)
1. Environmental Impact of Bronchoscopy: Analysis of Waste Mass and Recyclability of Bronchoscopic Equipment and Consumables.
Patrucco F; Gavelli F; Balbo PE
Respiration; 2023; 102(10):905-911. PubMed ID: 37725933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Environmental Impact of Gastrointestinal Procedures: A Prospective Study of Waste Generation, Energy Consumption, and Auditing in an Endoscopy Unit.
Desai M; Campbell C; Perisetti A; Srinivasan S; Radadiya D; Patel H; Melquist S; Rex DK; Sharma P
Gastroenterology; 2024 Mar; 166(3):496-502.e3. PubMed ID: 38123023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.
Landrigan PJ; Raps H; Cropper M; Bald C; Brunner M; Canonizado EM; Charles D; Chiles TC; Donohue MJ; Enck J; Fenichel P; Fleming LE; Ferrier-Pages C; Fordham R; Gozt A; Griffin C; Hahn ME; Haryanto B; Hixson R; Ianelli H; James BD; Kumar P; Laborde A; Law KL; Martin K; Mu J; Mulders Y; Mustapha A; Niu J; Pahl S; Park Y; Pedrotti ML; Pitt JA; Ruchirawat M; Seewoo BJ; Spring M; Stegeman JJ; Suk W; Symeonides C; Takada H; Thompson RC; Vicini A; Wang Z; Whitman E; Wirth D; Wolff M; Yousuf AK; Dunlop S
Ann Glob Health; 2023; 89(1):23. PubMed ID: 36969097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Carbon Footprint of Single-Use Flexible Cystoscopes Compared with Reusable Cystoscopes.
Hogan D; Rauf H; Kinnear N; Hennessey DB
J Endourol; 2022 Nov; 36(11):1460-1464. PubMed ID: 35607858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Carbon footprint of atrial fibrillation catheter ablation.
Ditac G; Cottinet PJ; Quyen Le M; Grinberg D; Duchateau J; Gardey K; Dulac A; Delinière A; Haddad C; Boussuge-Roze J; Sacher F; Jaïs P; Chevalier P; Bessière F
Europace; 2023 Feb; 25(2):331-340. PubMed ID: 36107465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Healing patient, harming planet? A drive towards sustainable surgery: review of waste production and recyclability of surgical instrument packaging.
Lee YK; Hariri A; Ghedia R; Tikka T; Kim D
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2024 Jul; 106(6):492-497. PubMed ID: 38362809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation).
Bogner J; Pipatti R; Hashimoto S; Diaz C; Mareckova K; Diaz L; Kjeldsen P; Monni S; Faaij A; Gao Q; Zhang T; Ahmed MA; Sutamihardja RT; Gregory R;
Waste Manag Res; 2008 Feb; 26(1):11-32. PubMed ID: 18338699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Environmental Impact of Different Surgical Modalities of Hysterectomies.
Ramani S; Hartnett J; Karki S; Gallousis SM; Clark M; Andikyan V
JSLS; 2023; 27(3):. PubMed ID: 37663433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Life cycle assessment of routinely used endoscopic instruments and simple intervention to reduce our environmental impact.
López-Muñoz P; Martín-Cabezuelo R; Lorenzo-Zúñiga V; Vilariño-Feltrer G; Tort-Ausina I; Vidaurre A; Pons Beltran V
Gut; 2023 Sep; 72(9):1692-1697. PubMed ID: 37185655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Carbon Footprint in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Reusable and Single-Use Ureteroscopes.
Davis NF; McGrath S; Quinlan M; Jack G; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton DM
J Endourol; 2018 Mar; 32(3):214-217. PubMed ID: 29373918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimating the environmental impact of disposable endoscopic equipment and endoscopes.
Namburar S; von Renteln D; Damianos J; Bradish L; Barrett J; Aguilera-Fish A; Cushman-Roisin B; Pohl H
Gut; 2022 Jul; 71(7):1326-1331. PubMed ID: 34853058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determining national greenhouse gas emissions from waste-to-energy using the Balance Method.
Schwarzböck T; Rechberger H; Cencic O; Fellner J
Waste Manag; 2016 Mar; 49():263-271. PubMed ID: 26847720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Environmental Impact of Interventional Radiology: An Evaluation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from an Academic Interventional Radiology Practice.
Chua ALB; Amin R; Zhang J; Thiel CL; Gross JS
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2021 Jun; 32(6):907-915.e3. PubMed ID: 33794372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of the Waste Volume and CO
Winkelkötter J; Reitz T
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2022 Jul; 16(4):896-903. PubMed ID: 33576259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Environmental impact of single-use and reusable flexible cystoscopes.
Kemble JP; Winoker JS; Patel SH; Su ZT; Matlaga BR; Potretzke AM; Koo K
BJU Int; 2023 May; 131(5):617-622. PubMed ID: 36515438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of carbon footprint emissions and environmental concerns of solid waste treatment and disposal techniques; case study of Malaysia.
Malakahmad A; Abualqumboz MS; Kutty SRM; Abunama TJ
Waste Manag; 2017 Dec; 70():282-292. PubMed ID: 28935377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Environmental sustainability in orthopaedic surgery : a scoping review.
Phoon KM; Afzal I; Sochart DH; Asopa V; Gikas P; Kader D
Bone Jt Open; 2022 Aug; 3(8):628-640. PubMed ID: 35965477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the Burden of Packaging and Recyclability of Single-Use Products in Interventional Radiology.
Clements W; Chow J; Corish C; Tang VD; Houlihan C
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2020 Jun; 43(6):910-915. PubMed ID: 32034434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The carbon footprint of treating patients with septic shock in the intensive care unit.
McGain F; Burnham JP; Lau R; Aye L; Kollef MH; McAlister S
Crit Care Resusc; 2018 Dec; 20(4):304-312. PubMed ID: 30482138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Recycling of Disposable Surgical Instruments - Is It Worth It?].
Dohmen J; Lessau M; Schmitz M; Kalff JC
Zentralbl Chir; 2023 Aug; 148(4):329-336. PubMed ID: 37562394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
