These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Respecting the autonomy of chronic mentally ill women in decisions about contraception. Coverdale JH; Bayer TL; McCullough LB; Chervenak FA Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1993 Jul; 44(7):671-4. PubMed ID: 8354506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The capacity to designate a surrogate is distinct from decisional capacity: normative and empirical considerations. Navin M; Wasserman JA; Stahl D; Tomlinson T J Med Ethics; 2022 Mar; 48(3):189-192. PubMed ID: 33608449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Decision-making capacity: from testing to evaluation. Hermann H; Feuz M; Trachsel M; Biller-Andorno N Med Health Care Philos; 2020 Jun; 23(2):253-259. PubMed ID: 32350707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Should Assessments of Decision-Making Capacity Be Risk-Sensitive? A Systematic Review. Berens NC; Kim SYH Front Psychol; 2022; 13():897144. PubMed ID: 35846634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Issues in data monitoring and interim analysis of trials. Grant AM; Altman DG; Babiker AB; Campbell MK; Clemens FJ; Darbyshire JH; Elbourne DR; McLeer SK; Parmar MK; Pocock SJ; Spiegelhalter DJ; Sydes MR; Walker AE; Wallace SA; Health Technol Assess; 2005 Mar; 9(7):1-238, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 15763038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three Kinds of Decision-Making Capacity for Refusing Medical Interventions. Navin MC; Brummett AL; Wasserman JA Am J Bioeth; 2022 Nov; 22(11):73-83. PubMed ID: 34344267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The DNR decision--Part II. Ethical principles and application. Headley JA Dimens Oncol Nurs; 1991; 5(2):34-7. PubMed ID: 1843193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk-Sensitive Assessment of Decision-Making Capacity: A Comprehensive Defense. Kim SYH; Berens NC Hastings Cent Rep; 2023 Jul; 53(4):30-43. PubMed ID: 37549362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Some comments on the substituted judgement standard. Egonsson D Med Health Care Philos; 2010 Feb; 13(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 19234760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical paternalism or legal imperialism: not the only alternatives for handling Saikewicz-type cases. Buchanan A Am J Law Med; 1979; 5(2):97-117. PubMed ID: 507063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings. Truglio-Londrigan M; Slyer JT; Singleton JK; Worral P JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2012; 10(58):4633-4646. PubMed ID: 27820528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Parental role in medical decision-making: fact or fiction? A comparative study of ethical dilemmas in French and American neonatal intensive care units. Orfali K Soc Sci Med; 2004 May; 58(10):2009-22. PubMed ID: 15020016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. State Authority, Parental Authority, and the Rights of Mature Minors. Tunick M J Ethics; 2023; 27(1):7-29. PubMed ID: 34512117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Capacity for Preferences: Respecting Patients with Compromised Decision-Making. Wasserman JA; Navin MC Hastings Cent Rep; 2018 May; 48(3):31-39. PubMed ID: 29806903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The physician as fortune teller: a commentary on "The ethical justification for minimal paternalism. MacKay CR J Clin Ethics; 1991; 2(4):228-38. PubMed ID: 11642962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of ethical judgments exhibited by clients and ethics consultants in Japan. Nagao N; Kadooka Y; Asai A BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Mar; 15():19. PubMed ID: 24592932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]