141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37726615)
1. Agreement of two vendor-independent strain analysis software platforms in assessing left ventricular global longitudinal strain.
Rhee TM; Kim HK; Choi YJ; Lee HJ; Hwang IC; Yoon YE; Kim HL; Park JB; Lee SP; Kim YJ; Cho GY
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Sep; 38(9):1939-1950. PubMed ID: 37726615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproducibility and Intervendor Agreement of Left Ventricular Global Systolic Strain in Children Using a Layer-Specific Analysis.
Ramlogan S; Aly D; France R; Schmidt S; Hinzman J; Sherman A; Goudar SP; Forsha D
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2020 Jan; 33(1):110-119. PubMed ID: 31668503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inter-vendor comparison of left atrial strain using layer specific strain analysis.
Ferkh A; Stefani L; Trivedi SJ; Brown P; Byth K; Pathan F; Thomas L
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Apr; 37(4):1279-1288. PubMed ID: 33389361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of strain parameters in dyssynchronous heart failure between speckle tracking echocardiography vendor systems.
van Everdingen WM; Maass AH; Vernooy K; Meine M; Allaart CP; De Lange FJ; Teske AJ; Geelhoed B; Rienstra M; Van Gelder IC; Vos MA; Cramer MJ
Cardiovasc Ultrasound; 2017 Oct; 15(1):25. PubMed ID: 29047378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Global longitudinal strain software upgrade: Implications for intervendor consistency and longitudinal imaging studies.
Castel AL; Menet A; Ennezat PV; Delelis F; Le Goffic C; Binda C; Guerbaai RA; Levy F; Graux P; Tribouilloy C; Maréchaux S
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2016 Jan; 109(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 26514326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intervendor variability of two-dimensional strain using vendor-specific and vendor-independent software.
Nagata Y; Takeuchi M; Mizukoshi K; Wu VC; Lin FC; Negishi K; Nakatani S; Otsuji Y
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2015 Jun; 28(6):630-41. PubMed ID: 25747915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of both DENSE and feature tracking techniques with tagging for the cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of myocardial strain.
Cao JJ; Ngai N; Duncanson L; Cheng J; Gliganic K; Chen Q
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Apr; 20(1):26. PubMed ID: 29669563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Left ventricular global myocardial strain assessment comparing the reproducibility of four commercially available CMR-feature tracking algorithms.
Barreiro-Pérez M; Curione D; Symons R; Claus P; Voigt JU; Bogaert J
Eur Radiol; 2018 Dec; 28(12):5137-5147. PubMed ID: 29872912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single systemic right ventricle longitudinal strain: Intravendor reproducibility and intervendor agreement in children.
Colquitt JL; Wilkinson JC; Liu AM; Pignatelli RH; Loar RW
Echocardiography; 2021 Mar; 38(3):402-409. PubMed ID: 33523543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantification of the variability associated with repeat measurements of left ventricular two-dimensional global longitudinal strain in a real-world setting.
Costa SP; Beaver TA; Rollor JL; Vanichakarn P; Magnus PC; Palac RT
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Jan; 27(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 24120317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Feasibility, Accuracy, and Reproducibility of Layer-Specific Global Longitudinal Strain Measurements Among Five Different Vendors: A Report from the EACVI-ASE Strain Standardization Task Force.
Ünlü S; Mirea O; Duchenne J; Pagourelias ED; Bézy S; Thomas JD; Badano LP; Voigt JU
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2018 Mar; 31(3):374-380.e1. PubMed ID: 29246512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inter-vendor variability and reproducibility of subcostal left ventricular longitudinal strain.
Gong FF; Nishtala A; Chow K; Jafari L; Azizuddin A; Ramirez H; Chuzi S; Akhter N
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 May; 37(5):1669-1678. PubMed ID: 33454895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variability and Reproducibility of Segmental Longitudinal Strain Measurement: A Report From the EACVI-ASE Strain Standardization Task Force.
Mirea O; Pagourelias ED; Duchenne J; Bogaert J; Thomas JD; Badano LP; Voigt JU;
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jan; 11(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 28528147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A multi-vendor, multi-center study on reproducibility and comparability of fast strain-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.
Erley J; Zieschang V; Lapinskas T; Demir A; Wiesemann S; Haass M; Osman NF; Simonetti OP; Liu Y; Patel AR; Mor-Avi V; Unal O; Johnson KM; Pieske B; Hansmann J; Schulz-Menger J; Kelle S
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 May; 36(5):899-911. PubMed ID: 32056087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Global longitudinal strain in heart transplantation recipients using different vendors: reliability and validity in a tertiary hospital in Colombia.
Perez-Fernandez OM; Medina HM; Lopez M; Barrera M; Martinez A; Benavides J; Duran JC; Salazar G; Manrique FT
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Feb; 38(2):279-287. PubMed ID: 34487311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contrast-enhanced echocardiographic measurement of longitudinal strain: accuracy and its relationship with image quality.
Karagodin I; Genovese D; Kruse E; Patel AR; Rashedi N; Lang RM; Mor-Avi V
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Mar; 36(3):431-439. PubMed ID: 31720940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inter-vendor reproducibility of left and right ventricular cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature-tracking.
Gertz RJ; Lange T; Kowallick JT; Backhaus SJ; Steinmetz M; Staab W; Kutty S; Hasenfuß G; Lotz J; Schuster A
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193746. PubMed ID: 29538467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of left ventricular manual versus automated derived longitudinal strain: implications for clinical practice and research.
Kobayashi Y; Ariyama M; Kobayashi Y; Giraldeau G; Fleischman D; Kozelj M; Vrtovec B; Ashley E; Kuznetsova T; Schnittger I; Liang D; Haddad F
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Mar; 32(3):429-37. PubMed ID: 26578468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multivendor comparison of global and regional 2D cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking strains vs tissue tagging at 3T.
Militaru S; Panovsky R; Hanet V; Amzulescu MS; Langet H; Pisciotti MM; Pouleur AC; Vanoverschelde JJ; Gerber BL
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2021 May; 23(1):54. PubMed ID: 33980259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comprehensive evaluation of left ventricular deformation using speckle tracking echocardiography in normal children: comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional approaches.
Aly D; Madan N; Kuzava L; Samrany A; Parthiban A
Cardiovasc Ultrasound; 2022 Jan; 20(1):3. PubMed ID: 35086543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
