152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37727487)
21. Evaluation of gadoxetate disodium as a contrast agent for mouse liver imaging: comparison with gadobenate dimeglumine.
Kiryu S; Inoue Y; Watanabe M; Izawa K; Shimada M; Tojo A; Yoshikawa K; Ohtomo K
Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jan; 27(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 18599243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. IDEAL-IQ measurement can distinguish dysplastic nodule from early hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-control study.
Zheng G; Wei F; Lu P; Yang G; Li C; Lin C; Zhou Y; Chen Y; Tian J; Wang X; Wang L; Liu W; Zhang G; Cai Q; Huang H; Yun Y
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2024 Jun; 14(6):3901-3913. PubMed ID: 38846285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Volume-assisted estimation of liver function based on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR relaxometry.
Haimerl M; Schlabeck M; Verloh N; Zeman F; Fellner C; Nickel D; Barreiros AP; Loss M; Stroszczynski C; Wiggermann P
Eur Radiol; 2016 Apr; 26(4):1125-33. PubMed ID: 26186960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Early phase detection of bile leak after hepatobiliary surgery: value of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR cholangiography.
Alegre Castellanos A; Molina Granados JF; Escribano Fernandez J; Gallardo Muñoz I; Triviño Tarradas Fde A
Abdom Imaging; 2012 Oct; 37(5):795-802. PubMed ID: 22213118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Liver vessel enhancement by Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA: a comparison in healthy volunteers.
Brismar TB; Dahlstrom N; Edsborg N; Persson A; Smedby O; Albiin N
Acta Radiol; 2009 Sep; 50(7):709-15. PubMed ID: 19701821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Influence of Gd-EOB-DTPA on T1 dependence of the proton density fat fraction using magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
Hayashi T; Fukuzawa K; Kondo H; Onodera H; Tojo R; Yano S; Miyati T; Kotoku J; Okamoto T; Toyoda K; Oba H
Radiol Phys Technol; 2018 Sep; 11(3):338-344. PubMed ID: 29858768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Assessment of hepatic function employing hepatocyte specific contrast agent concentrations to multifactorially evaluate fibrotic remodeling.
Breit HC; Vosshenrich J; Heye T; Gehweiler J; Winkel DJ; Potthast S; Merkle EM; Boll DT
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Jul; 13(7):4284-4294. PubMed ID: 37456296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Detection and characterization of focal liver lesions: a Japanese phase III, multicenter comparison between gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced computed tomography predominantly in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and chronic liver disease.
Ichikawa T; Saito K; Yoshioka N; Tanimoto A; Gokan T; Takehara Y; Kamura T; Gabata T; Murakami T; Ito K; Hirohashi S; Nishie A; Saito Y; Onaya H; Kuwatsuru R; Morimoto A; Ueda K; Kurauchi M; Breuer J
Invest Radiol; 2010 Mar; 45(3):133-41. PubMed ID: 20098330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Liver tumors: comparison of MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA.
Vogl TJ; Kümmel S; Hammerstingl R; Schellenbeck M; Schumacher G; Balzer T; Schwarz W; Müller PK; Bechstein WO; Mack MG; Söllner O; Felix R
Radiology; 1996 Jul; 200(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 8657946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced T1 relaxometry for assessment of liver function determined by real-time
Haimerl M; Fuhrmann I; Poelsterl S; Fellner C; Nickel MD; Weigand K; Dahlke MH; Verloh N; Stroszczynski C; Wiggermann P
Eur Radiol; 2018 Sep; 28(9):3591-3600. PubMed ID: 29532241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Contrast agent Gd-EOB-DTPA (EOB·Primovist®) for low-field magnetic resonance imaging of canine focal liver lesions.
Yonetomi D; Kadosawa T; Miyoshi K; Nakao Y; Homma E; Hanazono K; Yamada E; Nakamura K; Ijiri A; Minegishi N; Maetani S; Hirayama K; Taniyama H; Nakade T
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2012; 53(4):371-80. PubMed ID: 22548505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging features of hepatic hemangioma compared with enhanced computed tomography.
Tateyama A; Fukukura Y; Takumi K; Shindo T; Kumagae Y; Kamimura K; Nakajo M
World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Nov; 18(43):6269-76. PubMed ID: 23180948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Quantitative evaluation of liver function with MRI Using Gd-EOB-DTPA.
Ryeom HK; Kim SH; Kim JY; Kim HJ; Lee JM; Chang YM; Kim YS; Kang DS
Korean J Radiol; 2004; 5(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 15637473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of body mass index (BMI) on image contrast in the hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced-MRI and the feasibility of the application of half-dose Gd-EOB-DTPA to hepatobiliary phase imaging in patients with a BMI less than 24: a comparative study.
Chen R; Lu Y; Xiao Z; Zhang Z; Lv F; Lv F
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Sep; 13(9):6176-6192. PubMed ID: 37711824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Optimal scan timing for Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced liver dynamic MR imaging].
Akimoto S; Mori H; Fujii T; Furuya K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2009 May; 65(5):626-30. PubMed ID: 19498252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. IDEAL-IQ in an oncologic population: meeting the challenge of concomitant liver fat and liver iron.
Eskreis-Winkler S; Corrias G; Monti S; Zheng J; Capanu M; Krebs S; Fung M; Reeder S; Mannelli L
Cancer Imaging; 2018 Dec; 18(1):51. PubMed ID: 30541635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography with Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA in healthy subjects.
Dahlström N; Persson A; Albiin N; Smedby O; Brismar TB
Acta Radiol; 2007 May; 48(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 17453513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Understanding ADC variation by fat content effect using a dual-function MRI phantom.
Liu YJ; Tsai TS; Li YH; Peng JH; Chang HC; Peng HH; Lee YC; Lee TY; Liou CH; Lin TF; Chew FY; Chou RH; Juan CJ
Eur Radiol Exp; 2024 Feb; 8(1):19. PubMed ID: 38347188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of hepatobiliary uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA on the hepatic venous phase of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging on a 3.0-T apparatus: comparison between Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA.
Fujinaga Y; Ohya A; Matsushita T; Kurozumi M; Ueda K; Kitou Y; Ueda H; Kadoya M
Jpn J Radiol; 2011 Dec; 29(10):695-700. PubMed ID: 22009420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
