These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37728194)

  • 1. The impact on clinical outcomes and healthcare resources from discontinuing colonoscopy surveillance subsequent to low-risk adenoma removal: A simulation study using the OncoSim-Colorectal model.
    Steer KJ; Sun Z; Sadowski DC; Yong JHE; Coldman A; Nemecek N; Yang H
    J Med Screen; 2024 Jun; 31(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 37728194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Molecular stool testing as an alternative for surveillance colonoscopy: a cross-sectional cohort study.
    van Lanschot MC; Carvalho B; Coupé VM; van Engeland M; Dekker E; Meijer GA
    BMC Cancer; 2017 Feb; 17(1):116. PubMed ID: 28173852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening for Colorectal Cancer With Fecal Immunochemical Testing With and Without Postpolypectomy Surveillance Colonoscopy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Greuter MJE; de Klerk CM; Meijer GA; Dekker E; Coupé VMH
    Ann Intern Med; 2017 Oct; 167(8):544-554. PubMed ID: 28973514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-Intensity Versus Low-Intensity Surveillance for Patients With Colorectal Adenomas: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Meester RGS; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Winawer SJ; Zauber AG; Knudsen AB; Ladabaum U
    Ann Intern Med; 2019 Nov; 171(9):612-622. PubMed ID: 31546257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of screening and follow-up colonoscopy adenoma sensitivity on colorectal cancer screening outcomes in the CRC-AIM microsimulation model.
    Fisher DA; Saoud L; Hassmiller Lich K; Fendrick AM; Ozbay AB; Borah BJ; Matney M; Parton M; Limburg PJ
    Cancer Med; 2021 Apr; 10(8):2855-2864. PubMed ID: 33314646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Colonoscopy surveillance following adenoma removal to reduce the risk of colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.
    Cross AJ; Robbins EC; Pack K; Stenson I; Kirby PL; Patel B; Rutter MD; Veitch AM; Saunders BP; Little M; Gray A; Duffy SW; Wooldrage K
    Health Technol Assess; 2022 May; 26(26):1-156. PubMed ID: 35635015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of the effectiveness of two noninvasive fecal tests used to screen for colorectal cancer in average-risk adults.
    Sharma T
    Public Health; 2020 May; 182():70-76. PubMed ID: 32179290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2009; 9(10):1-40. PubMed ID: 23074514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.
    Dinh T; Ladabaum U; Alperin P; Caldwell C; Smith R; Levin TR
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Sep; 11(9):1158-66. PubMed ID: 23542330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Projecting total costs and health consequences of increasing mt-sDNA utilization for colorectal cancer screening from the payer and integrated delivery network perspectives.
    Hathway JM; Miller-Wilson LA; Jensen IS; Ozbay B; Regan C; Jena AB; Weinstein MC; Parks PD
    J Med Econ; 2020 Jun; 23(6):581-592. PubMed ID: 32063100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of colorectal cancer screenings in a low- and middle-income country: example from Thailand.
    Phisalprapa P; Supakankunti S; Chaiyakunapruk N
    J Med Econ; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1351-1361. PubMed ID: 31560247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Colorectal cancer screening: Estimated future colonoscopy need and current volume and capacity.
    Joseph DA; Meester RG; Zauber AG; Manninen DL; Winges L; Dong FB; Peaker B; van Ballegooijen M
    Cancer; 2016 Aug; 122(16):2479-86. PubMed ID: 27200481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Life-years gained resulting from screening colonoscopy compared with follow-up colonoscopy after a positive stool-based colorectal screening test.
    Mark Fendrick A; Borah BJ; Burak Ozbay A; Saoud L; Limburg PJ
    Prev Med Rep; 2022 Apr; 26():101701. PubMed ID: 35106276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prioritisation of colonoscopy services in colorectal cancer screening programmes to minimise impact of COVID-19 pandemic on predicted cancer burden: A comparative modelling study.
    van Wifferen F; de Jonge L; Worthington J; Greuter MJE; Lew JB; Nadeau C; van den Puttelaar R; Feletto E; Yong JHE; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Canfell K; Coupé VMH;
    J Med Screen; 2022 Jun; 29(2):72-83. PubMed ID: 35100894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The projected health and economic impact of increased colorectal cancer screening participation among Canadians by income quintile.
    Adegbulugbe AA; Farah E; Ruan Y; Yong JHE; Cheung WY; Brenner DR
    Can J Public Health; 2024 Jun; 115(3):384-394. PubMed ID: 38502494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-Term Prediction of the Demand of Colonoscopies Generated by a Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.
    Comas M; Mendivil J; Andreu M; Hernández C; Castells X
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164666. PubMed ID: 27732635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal timing of a colonoscopy screening schedule depends on adenoma detection, adenoma risk, adherence to screening and the screening objective: A microsimulation study.
    Zaika V; Prakash MK; Cheng CY; Schlander M; Lang BM; Beerenwinkel N; Sonnenberg A; Krupka N; Misselwitz B; Poleszczuk J
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0304374. PubMed ID: 38787836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The multitarget fecal immunochemical test versus the fecal immunochemical test for programmatic colorectal cancer screening: a cross-sectional intervention study with paired design.
    Wisse PHA; de Klaver W; van Wifferen F; Meiqari L; Bierkens M; Greuter MJE; Carvalho B; van Leerdam ME; Spaander MCW; Dekker E; Coupé VMH; de Wit M; Meijer GA
    BMC Cancer; 2022 Dec; 22(1):1299. PubMed ID: 36503495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.