These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37728194)

  • 1. The impact on clinical outcomes and healthcare resources from discontinuing colonoscopy surveillance subsequent to low-risk adenoma removal: A simulation study using the OncoSim-Colorectal model.
    Steer KJ; Sun Z; Sadowski DC; Yong JHE; Coldman A; Nemecek N; Yang H
    J Med Screen; 2024 Jun; 31(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 37728194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High-Intensity Versus Low-Intensity Surveillance for Patients With Colorectal Adenomas: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Meester RGS; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Winawer SJ; Zauber AG; Knudsen AB; Ladabaum U
    Ann Intern Med; 2019 Nov; 171(9):612-622. PubMed ID: 31546257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Faecal immunochemical tests versus colonoscopy for post-polypectomy surveillance: an accuracy, acceptability and economic study.
    Atkin W; Cross AJ; Kralj-Hans I; MacRae E; Piggott C; Pearson S; Wooldrage K; Brown J; Lucas F; Prendergast A; Marchevsky N; Patel B; Pack K; Howe R; Skrobanski H; Kerrison R; Swart N; Snowball J; Duffy SW; Morris S; von Wagner C; Halloran S
    Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jan; 23(1):1-84. PubMed ID: 30618357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) versus colonoscopy for surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness study.
    Cross AJ; Wooldrage K; Robbins EC; Kralj-Hans I; MacRae E; Piggott C; Stenson I; Prendergast A; Patel B; Pack K; Howe R; Swart N; Snowball J; Duffy SW; Morris S; von Wagner C; Halloran SP; Atkin WS
    Gut; 2019 Sep; 68(9):1642-1652. PubMed ID: 30538097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening for Colorectal Cancer With Fecal Immunochemical Testing With and Without Postpolypectomy Surveillance Colonoscopy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Greuter MJE; de Klerk CM; Meijer GA; Dekker E; Coupé VMH
    Ann Intern Med; 2017 Oct; 167(8):544-554. PubMed ID: 28973514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Projecting total costs and health consequences of increasing mt-sDNA utilization for colorectal cancer screening from the payer and integrated delivery network perspectives.
    Hathway JM; Miller-Wilson LA; Jensen IS; Ozbay B; Regan C; Jena AB; Weinstein MC; Parks PD
    J Med Econ; 2020 Jun; 23(6):581-592. PubMed ID: 32063100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Population health outcomes of blood-based screening for colorectal cancer in comparison to current screening modalities: insights from a discrete-event simulation model incorporating longitudinal adherence.
    Forbes SP; Yay Donderici E; Zhang N; Sharif B; Tremblay G; Schafer G; Raymond VM; Talasaz A; Eagle C; Das AK; Grady WM
    J Med Econ; 2024; 27(1):991-1002. PubMed ID: 39037853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.
    Dinh T; Ladabaum U; Alperin P; Caldwell C; Smith R; Levin TR
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Sep; 11(9):1158-66. PubMed ID: 23542330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of the effectiveness of two noninvasive fecal tests used to screen for colorectal cancer in average-risk adults.
    Sharma T
    Public Health; 2020 May; 182():70-76. PubMed ID: 32179290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of screening and follow-up colonoscopy adenoma sensitivity on colorectal cancer screening outcomes in the CRC-AIM microsimulation model.
    Fisher DA; Saoud L; Hassmiller Lich K; Fendrick AM; Ozbay AB; Borah BJ; Matney M; Parton M; Limburg PJ
    Cancer Med; 2021 Apr; 10(8):2855-2864. PubMed ID: 33314646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variation in Adenoma Detection Rate and the Lifetime Benefits and Cost of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Microsimulation Model.
    Meester RG; Doubeni CA; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Jensen CD; van der Meulen MP; Levin TR; Quinn VP; Schottinger JE; Zauber AG; Corley DA; van Ballegooijen M
    JAMA; 2015 Jun; 313(23):2349-58. PubMed ID: 26080339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Budget Impact Analysis of Against Colorectal Cancer In Our Neighborhoods (ACCION): A Successful Community-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program for a Medically Underserved Minority Population.
    Kim B; Lairson DR; Chung TH; Kim J; Shokar NK
    Value Health; 2017 Jun; 20(6):809-818. PubMed ID: 28577699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-Effectiveness of Multitarget Stool DNA Testing vs Colonoscopy or Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Alaska Native People.
    Redwood DG; Dinh TA; Kisiel JB; Borah BJ; Moriarty JP; Provost EM; Sacco FD; Tiesinga JJ; Ahlquist DA
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2021 May; 96(5):1203-1217. PubMed ID: 33840520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of colorectal cancer screenings in a low- and middle-income country: example from Thailand.
    Phisalprapa P; Supakankunti S; Chaiyakunapruk N
    J Med Econ; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1351-1361. PubMed ID: 31560247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-Term Prediction of the Demand of Colonoscopies Generated by a Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.
    Comas M; Mendivil J; Andreu M; Hernández C; Castells X
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164666. PubMed ID: 27732635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of Patient Adherence to Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening and Colonoscopy Following a Positive Test on Clinical Outcomes.
    Fendrick AM; Fisher DA; Saoud L; Ozbay AB; Karlitz JJ; Limburg PJ
    Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2021 Sep; 14(9):845-850. PubMed ID: 34021023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Colonoscopy surveillance following adenoma removal to reduce the risk of colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.
    Cross AJ; Robbins EC; Pack K; Stenson I; Kirby PL; Patel B; Rutter MD; Veitch AM; Saunders BP; Little M; Gray A; Duffy SW; Wooldrage K
    Health Technol Assess; 2022 May; 26(26):1-156. PubMed ID: 35635015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantifying the impact of adherence to screening strategies on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality.
    D'Andrea E; Ahnen DJ; Sussman DA; Najafzadeh M
    Cancer Med; 2020 Jan; 9(2):824-836. PubMed ID: 31777197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Molecular stool testing as an alternative for surveillance colonoscopy: a cross-sectional cohort study.
    van Lanschot MC; Carvalho B; Coupé VM; van Engeland M; Dekker E; Meijer GA
    BMC Cancer; 2017 Feb; 17(1):116. PubMed ID: 28173852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Consequences of Increasing Time to Colonoscopy Examination After Positive Result From Fecal Colorectal Cancer Screening Test.
    Meester RG; Zauber AG; Doubeni CA; Jensen CD; Quinn VP; Helfand M; Dominitz JA; Levin TR; Corley DA; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Oct; 14(10):1445-1451.e8. PubMed ID: 27211498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.