145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3773096)
1. The value of computerized tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging in staging prostatic carcinoma: comparison with the clinical and histological staging.
Mukamel E; Hannah J; Barbaric Z; deKernion JB
J Urol; 1986 Dec; 136(6):1231-3. PubMed ID: 3773096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preoperative prediction of pathological tumor volume and stage in clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging.
McSherry SA; Levy F; Schiebler ML; Keefe B; Dent GA; Mohler JL
J Urol; 1991 Jul; 146(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 1711590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Staging of localized prostate cancer: a clinical-pathologic correlation.
Mukamel E; de Kernion JB; Hannah J; Barbaric Z
J Urol (Paris); 1988; 94(8):381-8. PubMed ID: 3241091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. T3 prostate cancer: how reliable is clinical staging?
Ravery V; Boccon-Gibod L
Semin Urol Oncol; 1997 Nov; 15(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9421446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transrectal ultrasound versus digital rectal examination for the staging of carcinoma of the prostate: results of a prospective, multi-institutional trial.
Smith JA; Scardino PT; Resnick MI; Hernandez AD; Rose SC; Egger MJ
J Urol; 1997 Mar; 157(3):902-6. PubMed ID: 9072596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of digital rectal examination and biopsy results with the radical prostatectomy specimen.
Obek C; Louis P; Civantos F; Soloway MS
J Urol; 1999 Feb; 161(2):494-8; discussion 498-9. PubMed ID: 9915434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of rectal examination, transrectal echography, CAT and MRI in the local staging of prostatic carcinoma].
Montorsi F; Guazzoni G; Consonni P; Colombo R; Nava L; Bergamaschi F; Scattoni V; Rigatti P
Arch Ital Urol Nefrol Androl; 1991 Jun; 63 Suppl 2():143-5. PubMed ID: 1836654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Final analysis of a prospective trial on functional imaging for nodal staging in patients with prostate cancer at high risk for lymph node involvement.
Van den Bergh L; Lerut E; Haustermans K; Deroose CM; Oyen R; Isebaert S; Budiharto T; Ameye F; Mottaghy FM; Bogaerts K; Van Poppel H; Joniau S
Urol Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):109.e23-31. PubMed ID: 25655681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of magnetic resonance (0,5 T), computed tomography, and endorectal ultrasonography in the preoperative staging of neoplasms of the rectum-sigma. Correlation with surgical and anatomopathologic findings].
Golfieri R; Giampalma E; Leo P; Colecchia A; Selleri S; Poggioli G; Gandolfi L; Gozzetti G; Trebbi F; Russo A
Radiol Med; 1993 Jun; 85(6):773-83. PubMed ID: 8337435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patients with abnormal ultrasound of the prostate but normal digital rectal examination should be classified as having clinical stage T2 tumors.
Tiguert R; Gheiler EL; Grignon DJ; Littrup PJ; Sakr W; Pontes JE; Wood DP
J Urol; 2000 May; 163(5):1486-90. PubMed ID: 10751863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Role of magnetic resonance in the identification, characterization and staging of prostatic cancer. Comparison with transrectal echotomography and computerized tomography].
Gualdi GF; Volpe A; Polettini E; Ceroni AM; D'Agostino A; Capuano R
Clin Ter; 1994 Mar; 144(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 8181221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Preoperative T-staging of prostatic carcinoma: endorectal magnetic resonance tomography compared with other imaging and clinical methods].
Böni RA; Hutter BE; Trinkler F; Jochum W; Pestalozzi D; Krestin GP
Rofo; 1996 Aug; 165(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 8924668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma by computed tomography and 0.15T magnetic resonance imaging. Preliminary report.
Hodgman CG; MacCarty RL; Wolff BG; May GR; Berquist TH; Sheedy PF; Beart RW; Spencer RJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 1986 Jul; 29(7):446-50. PubMed ID: 3720456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identification and therapy of stage B prostate carcinoma.
deKernion JB; Mukamel E
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1987; 243B():267-76. PubMed ID: 3659024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15.
Lopci E; Saita A; Lazzeri M; Lughezzani G; Colombo P; Buffi NM; Hurle R; Marzo K; Peschechera R; Benetti A; Zandegiacomo S; Pasini L; Lista G; Cardone P; Castello A; Maffei D; Balzarini L; Chiti A; Guazzoni G; Casale P
J Urol; 2018 Jul; 200(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 29409824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer.
Guinet C; Buy JN; Ghossain MA; Sézeur A; Mallet A; Bigot JM; Vadrot D; Ecoiffier J
Arch Surg; 1990 Mar; 125(3):385-8. PubMed ID: 2306185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The clinical value of preoperative staging of bladder and prostatic cancers with nuclear magnetic resonance and computerized tomography].
Beer M; Schmidt H; Riedl R
Urologe A; 1989 Mar; 28(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 2718295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of extracapsular invasion and other staging parameters in patients with prostate cancer candidates for radical prostatectomy.
Lista F; Gimbernat H; Cáceres F; Rodríguez-Barbero JM; Castillo E; Angulo JC
Actas Urol Esp; 2014 Jun; 38(5):290-7. PubMed ID: 24387827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determination of local tumour extension in cases of carcinoma of the prostate.
Wolff JM; Borchers H; Jakse G
Arch Esp Urol; 1997 Jun; 50(5):546-53. PubMed ID: 9253209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection allows significantly more accurate staging in "high-risk" prostate cancer compared to MRI or CT.
Borley N; Fabrin K; Sriprasad S; Mondaini N; Thompson P; Muir G; Poulsen J
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2003; 37(5):382-6. PubMed ID: 14594685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
