144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37731519)
1. The long-term safety and effectiveness of the loop technique in left ventricular lead dislocation.
Dong M; Liang C; Cheng G
Front Cardiovasc Med; 2023; 10():1154125. PubMed ID: 37731519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Novel Approach for Repetitive Dislocation of Transvenous Left Ventricular Leads During Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Implantation by the Loop Technique.
Wu HY; Li SJ; Yang Z; Chen HC; You PH; Cheng G
Front Cardiovasc Med; 2022; 9():836514. PubMed ID: 35800169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combination of left ventricular reverse remodeling and brain natriuretic peptide level at one year after cardiac resynchronization therapy predicts long-term clinical outcome.
Roubicek T; Stros J; Kucera P; Nedbal P; Cerny J; Polasek R; Wichterle D
PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219966. PubMed ID: 31314790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Application and efficacy of the adjustment on left ventricular electrical delay and the distance between right and left ventricular pacing polar in optimizing the left ventricular pacing polar].
Yan XL; Liang YC; Yu HB; Xu BG; Gao Y; Liu R; Xu GQ; Wu M
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 48(8):669-674. PubMed ID: 32847323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized trial of cardiac resynchronization in mildly symptomatic heart failure patients and in asymptomatic patients with left ventricular dysfunction and previous heart failure symptoms.
Linde C; Abraham WT; Gold MR; St John Sutton M; Ghio S; Daubert C;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Dec; 52(23):1834-1843. PubMed ID: 19038680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with and without pressure-volume loop optimization: comparison of the long-term efficacy of two different programming strategies.
Ciconte G; Ćalović Ž; McSpadden LC; Ryu K; Mangual J; Caporaso I; Baldi M; Saviano M; Cuko A; Vitale R; Conti M; Giannelli L; Vicedomini G; Santinelli V; Pappone C
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2019 Mar; 54(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 30483980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and moderately reduced ejection fraction: Could it trigger a super-response?
Tawfik Ghanem M; Allam LE; Samir Ahmed R
Indian Heart J; 2019; 71(3):229-234. PubMed ID: 31543195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the efficacy of two surgical alternatives for cardiac resynchronization therapy: trans-apical versus epicardial left ventricular pacing.
Mihalcz A; Kassai I; Kardos A; Foldesi C; Theuns D; Szili-Torok T
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 Feb; 35(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 22017475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non-Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single-Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization.
Leyva F; Zegard A; Qiu T; Acquaye E; Ferrante G; Walton J; Marshall H
J Am Heart Assoc; 2017 Oct; 6(10):. PubMed ID: 29042422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Myocardial gene expression in heart failure patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy responders versus nonresponders.
Vanderheyden M; Mullens W; Delrue L; Goethals M; de Bruyne B; Wijns W; Geelen P; Verstreken S; Wellens F; Bartunek J
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Jan; 51(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 18191736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimization of left ventricular pacing site plus multipoint pacing improves remodeling and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy at 1 year.
Zanon F; Marcantoni L; Baracca E; Pastore G; Lanza D; Fraccaro C; Picariello C; Conte L; Aggio S; Roncon L; Pacetta D; Badie N; Noventa F; Prinzen FW
Heart Rhythm; 2016 Aug; 13(8):1644-51. PubMed ID: 27450156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy in mild heart failure: 5-year results from the REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic left vEntricular dysfunction (REVERSE) study.
Linde C; Gold MR; Abraham WT; St John Sutton M; Ghio S; Cerkvenik J; Daubert C;
Eur Heart J; 2013 Sep; 34(33):2592-9. PubMed ID: 23641006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Longer right to left ventricular activation delay at cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation is associated with improved clinical outcome in left bundle branch block patients.
Kosztin A; Kutyifa V; Nagy VK; Geller L; Zima E; Molnar L; Szilagyi S; Ozcan EE; Szeplaki G; Merkely B
Europace; 2016 Apr; 18(4):550-9. PubMed ID: 26116830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multipoint left ventricular pacing in a single coronary sinus branch improves mid-term echocardiographic and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Pappone C; Ćalović Ž; Vicedomini G; Cuko A; McSpadden LC; Ryu K; Romano E; Baldi M; Saviano M; Pappone A; Ciaccio C; Giannelli L; Ionescu B; Petretta A; Vitale R; Fundaliotis A; Tavazzi L; Santinelli V
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 25109276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical impact of an additional left ventricular lead in cardiac resynchronization therapy nonresponders: The V
Bordachar P; Gras D; Clementy N; Defaye P; Mondoly P; Boveda S; Anselme F; Klug D; Piot O; Sadoul N; Babuty D; Leclercq C
Heart Rhythm; 2018 Jun; 15(6):870-876. PubMed ID: 29288035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Right ventricular septal pacing as alternative for failed left ventricular lead implantation in cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates.
Alhous MH; Small GR; Hannah A; Hillis GS; Frenneaux M; Broadhurst PA
Europace; 2015 Jan; 17(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 25359384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of right ventricular lead location on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with end-stage heart failure.
Haghjoo M; Bonakdar HR; Jorat MV; Fazelifar AF; Alizadeh A; Ojaghi-Haghjghi Z; Esmaielzadeh M; Sadr-Ameli MA
Europace; 2009 Mar; 11(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 19136489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feasibility, safety, and mid-term efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with severe heart failure and ventricular conduction delay: Chulalongkorn experience.
Sunsaneewitayakul B; Sitthisook S; Sangwatanaroj S; Prechawat S; Songmuang SB
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Jul; 90(7):1458-66. PubMed ID: 17710992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving cardiac resynchronization therapy response with multipoint left ventricular pacing: Twelve-month follow-up study.
Pappone C; Ćalović Ž; Vicedomini G; Cuko A; McSpadden LC; Ryu K; Jordan CD; Romano E; Baldi M; Saviano M; Pappone A; Vitale R; Catalano C; Ciaccio C; Giannelli L; Ionescu B; Petretta A; Fragakis N; Fundaliotis A; Tavazzi L; Santinelli V
Heart Rhythm; 2015 Jun; 12(6):1250-8. PubMed ID: 25678057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Left ventricular-only fusion pacing versus cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients: A randomized controlled trial.
Su Y; Hua W; Shen F; Zou J; Tang B; Chen K; Liang Y; He L; Zhou X; Zhang X; Lu H; Zhang S
Clin Cardiol; 2021 Sep; 44(9):1225-1232. PubMed ID: 34342026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
