208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37731636)
1. Methodological quality of radiomic-based prognostic studies in gastric cancer: a cross-sectional study.
Jiang T; Zhao Z; Liu X; Shen C; Mu M; Cai Z; Zhang B
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1161237. PubMed ID: 37731636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality of radiomics for predicting microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review.
Yuan E; Chen Y; Song B
Eur Radiol; 2023 May; 33(5):3467-3477. PubMed ID: 36749371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality of science and reporting of radiomics in oncologic studies: room for improvement according to radiomics quality score and TRIPOD statement.
Park JE; Kim D; Kim HS; Park SY; Kim JY; Cho SJ; Shin JH; Kim JH
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):523-536. PubMed ID: 31350588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiomics in precision medicine for gastric cancer: opportunities and challenges.
Chen Q; Zhang L; Liu S; You J; Chen L; Jin Z; Zhang S; Zhang B
Eur Radiol; 2022 Sep; 32(9):5852-5868. PubMed ID: 35316364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiomics for predicting survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Feng Y; Gong J; Hu T; Liu Z; Sun Y; Tong T
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Dec; 13(12):8395-8412. PubMed ID: 38106286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The gap before real clinical application of imaging-based machine-learning and radiomic models for chemoradiation outcome prediction in esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yang Z; Gong J; Li J; Sun H; Pan Y; Zhao L
Int J Surg; 2023 Aug; 109(8):2451-2466. PubMed ID: 37463039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A systematic review of radiomics in chondrosarcoma: assessment of study quality and clinical value needs handy tools.
Zhong J; Hu Y; Ge X; Xing Y; Ding D; Zhang G; Zhang H; Yang Q; Yao W
Eur Radiol; 2023 Feb; 33(2):1433-1444. PubMed ID: 36018355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality assessment of radiomics models in carotid plaque: a systematic review.
Hou C; Li S; Zheng S; Liu LP; Nie F; Zhang W; He W
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2024 Jan; 14(1):1141-1154. PubMed ID: 38223070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A systematic review of radiomics in osteosarcoma: utilizing radiomics quality score as a tool promoting clinical translation.
Zhong J; Hu Y; Si L; Jia G; Xing Y; Zhang H; Yao W
Eur Radiol; 2021 Mar; 31(3):1526-1535. PubMed ID: 32876837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Current status and quality of radiomics studies for predicting outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kong J; Zhang D
Front Neurol; 2023; 14():1335851. PubMed ID: 38229595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality of Radiomics Research on Brain Metastasis: A Roadmap to Promote Clinical Translation.
Park CJ; Park YW; Ahn SS; Kim D; Kim EH; Kang SG; Chang JH; Kim SH; Lee SK
Korean J Radiol; 2022 Jan; 23(1):77-88. PubMed ID: 34983096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Post-radiotherapy stage III/IV non-small cell lung cancer radiomics research: a systematic review and comparison of CLEAR and RQS frameworks.
Tran K; Ginzburg D; Hong W; Attenberger U; Ko HS
Eur Radiol; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38625613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The quality and clinical translation of radiomics studies based on MRI for predicting Ki-67 levels in patients with breast cancer.
Wang M; Mei T; Gong Y
Br J Radiol; 2023 Oct; 96(1150):20230172. PubMed ID: 37724784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A systematic review of prognosis predictive role of radiomics in pancreatic cancer: heterogeneity markers or statistical tricks?
Gao Y; Cheng S; Zhu L; Wang Q; Deng W; Sun Z; Wang S; Xue H
Eur Radiol; 2022 Dec; 32(12):8443-8452. PubMed ID: 35904618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bias and Reporting Quality of Clinical Prognostic Models for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Di J; Li X; Yang J; Li L; Yu X
Risk Manag Healthc Policy; 2022; 15():1189-1201. PubMed ID: 35702399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality assessment of meningioma radiomics studies: Bridging the gap between exploratory research and clinical applications.
Won SY; Park YW; Ahn SS; Moon JH; Kim EH; Kang SG; Chang JH; Kim SH; Lee SK
Eur J Radiol; 2021 May; 138():109673. PubMed ID: 33774441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can quantitative peritumoral CT radiomics features predict the prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer? A systematic review.
Wu L; Lou X; Kong N; Xu M; Gao C
Eur Radiol; 2023 Mar; 33(3):2105-2117. PubMed ID: 36307554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of science and reporting for radiomics in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging studies: a systematic review.
Chang S; Han K; Suh YJ; Choi BW
Eur Radiol; 2022 Jul; 32(7):4361-4373. PubMed ID: 35230519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic models for predicting relapse or recurrence of major depressive disorder in adults.
Moriarty AS; Meader N; Snell KI; Riley RD; Paton LW; Chew-Graham CA; Gilbody S; Churchill R; Phillips RS; Ali S; McMillan D
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 May; 5(5):CD013491. PubMed ID: 33956992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiomics models for preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhong X; Long H; Su L; Zheng R; Wang W; Duan Y; Hu H; Lin M; Xie X
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Jun; 47(6):2071-2088. PubMed ID: 35364684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
