199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37732322)
1. Analysis of chromosomal structural variations in patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion using optical genome mapping.
Rao H; Zhang H; Zou Y; Ma P; Huang T; Yuan H; Zhou J; Lu W; Li Q; Huang S; Liu Y; Yang B
Front Genet; 2023; 14():1248755. PubMed ID: 37732322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of complex chromosome rearrangements using optical genome mapping.
Qu J; Li S; Yu D
Gene; 2023 Oct; 884():147688. PubMed ID: 37543218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of cryptic balanced chromosomal rearrangements using high-resolution optical genome mapping.
Zhang S; Pei Z; Lei C; Zhu S; Deng K; Zhou J; Yang J; Lu D; Sun X; Xu C; Xu C
J Med Genet; 2023 Mar; 60(3):274-284. PubMed ID: 35710108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of complex and cryptic chromosomal rearrangements by optical genome mapping.
Shi S; Huang P; Yan R; Li R
Mol Cytogenet; 2023 Apr; 16(1):5. PubMed ID: 37101225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combination of trio-based whole exome sequencing and optical genome mapping reveals a cryptic balanced translocation that causes unbalanced chromosomal rearrangements in a family with multiple anomalies.
Xie M; Xue J; Zhang Y; Zhou Y; Yu Q; Li H; Li Q
Front Genet; 2023; 14():1248544. PubMed ID: 37745854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Optical genome mapping enables constitutional chromosomal aberration detection.
Mantere T; Neveling K; Pebrel-Richard C; Benoist M; van der Zande G; Kater-Baats E; Baatout I; van Beek R; Yammine T; Oorsprong M; Hsoumi F; Olde-Weghuis D; Majdali W; Vermeulen S; Pauper M; Lebbar A; Stevens-Kroef M; Sanlaville D; Dupont JM; Smeets D; Hoischen A; Schluth-Bolard C; El Khattabi L
Am J Hum Genet; 2021 Aug; 108(8):1409-1422. PubMed ID: 34237280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Case report: Optical genome mapping revealed double rearrangements in a male undergoing preimplantation genetic testing.
Ren J; Keqie Y; Li Y; Li L; Luo M; Gao M; Peng C; Chen H; Hu T; Chen X; Liu S
Front Genet; 2023; 14():1132404. PubMed ID: 37065489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Whole-genome mate-pair sequencing of apparently balanced chromosome rearrangements reveals complex structural variations: two case studies.
Tan YQ; Tan YQ; Cheng DH
Mol Cytogenet; 2020; 13():15. PubMed ID: 32391085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oxford Nanopore and Bionano Genomics technologies evaluation for plant structural variation detection.
Canaguier A; Guilbaud R; Denis E; Magdelenat G; Belser C; Istace B; Cruaud C; Wincker P; Le Paslier MC; Faivre-Rampant P; Barbe V
BMC Genomics; 2022 Apr; 23(1):317. PubMed ID: 35448948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optical Genome Mapping as a Potential Routine Clinical Diagnostic Method.
Barseghyan H; Eisenreich D; Lindt E; Wendlandt M; Scharf F; Benet-Pages A; Sendelbach K; Neuhann T; Abicht A; Holinski-Feder E; Koehler U
Genes (Basel); 2024 Mar; 15(3):. PubMed ID: 38540401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative Benchmarking of Optical Genome Mapping and Chromosomal Microarray Reveals High Technological Concordance in CNV Identification and Additional Structural Variant Refinement.
Barseghyan H; Pang AWC; Clifford B; Serrano MA; Chaubey A; Hastie AR
Genes (Basel); 2023 Sep; 14(10):. PubMed ID: 37895217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-read Oxford nanopore sequencing reveals a de novo case of complex chromosomal rearrangement involving chromosomes 2, 7, and 13.
Xing L; Shen Y; Wei X; Luo Y; Yang Y; Liu H; Liu H
Mol Genet Genomic Med; 2022 Sep; 10(9):e2011. PubMed ID: 35758276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accurate Identification of Breakpoints in a Cryptic Reciprocal Translocation by Whole-Genome Sequencing.
Chen J; Lyu GZ; Jiang F; Zhang VW; Li DZ
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2022; 162(7):386-390. PubMed ID: 36893740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identifying Balanced Chromosomal Translocations in Human Embryos by Oxford Nanopore Sequencing and Breakpoints Region Analysis.
Pei Z; Deng K; Lei C; Du D; Yu G; Sun X; Xu C; Zhang S
Front Genet; 2021; 12():810900. PubMed ID: 35116057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Identification of a balanced complex chromosomal rearrangement involving chromosomes 3, 18 and 21 with recurrent abortion: case report.
Liao Y; Wang L; Zhang D; Liu C
Mol Cytogenet; 2014; 7():39. PubMed ID: 24959204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optical Genome Mapping as a Next-Generation Cytogenomic Tool for Detection of Structural and Copy Number Variations for Prenatal Genomic Analyses.
Sahajpal NS; Barseghyan H; Kolhe R; Hastie A; Chaubey A
Genes (Basel); 2021 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 33799648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of balanced reciprocal translocations in patients with subfertility using single-molecule optical mapping.
Wang H; Jia Z; Mao A; Xu B; Wang S; Wang L; Liu S; Zhang H; Zhang X; Yu T; Mu T; Xu M; Cram DS; Yao Y
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2020 Mar; 37(3):509-516. PubMed ID: 32026199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Optical Genome Mapping With Conventional Diagnostic Methods for Structural Variant Detection in Hematologic Malignancies.
Shim Y; Koo YK; Shin S; Lee ST; Lee KA; Choi JR
Ann Lab Med; 2024 Jul; 44(4):324-334. PubMed ID: 38433573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optical Genome Mapping for Chromosomal Aberrations Detection-False-Negative Results and Contributing Factors.
Xu Y; Zhang Q; Wang Y; Zhou R; Ji X; Meng L; Luo C; Liu A; Jiao J; Chen H; Zeng H; Hu P; Xu Z
Diagnostics (Basel); 2024 Jan; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 38248042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Efficacy and initial clinical evaluation of optical genome mapping in the diagnosis of structural variations].
Hao N; Zhou J; Li MM; Luo WW; Zhang HZ; Qi QW; Jiang YL; Zhou XY; Yang K; Chen H; Pan HJ; Zhu JT; Liu J
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 May; 56(5):632-639. PubMed ID: 35644979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
