129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37733207)
21. Dose optimization in pediatric cardiac x-ray imaging.
Gislason AJ; Davies AG; Cowen AR
Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5258-69. PubMed ID: 21089760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Reducing radiation dose by application of optimized low-energy x-ray filters to K-edge imaging with a photon counting detector.
Choi YN; Lee S; Kim HJ
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jan; 61(2):N35-49. PubMed ID: 26733235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Entrance surface dose during three-dimensional imaging with a flat-panel detector angiography system.
Suzuki S; Furui S; Yamaguchi I; Yamagishi M; Abe T; Kobayashi I; Haruyama T
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 Sep; 19(9):1361-5. PubMed ID: 18725100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dynamic flat panel detector versus image intensifier in cardiac imaging: dose and image quality.
Vano E; Geiger B; Schreiner A; Back C; Beissel J
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5731-42. PubMed ID: 16306664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Multicenter Survey of the Display Air Kerma and Actual Measured Values in IVR X-ray Apparatus].
Tanabe N; Sekiguchi H; Tsukamoto A; Ishida H; Ueno H; Kittaka D; Takura H; Fujimura K; Tajima O; Sato H; Tajima T; Hiroshima H
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2019; 75(7):646-651. PubMed ID: 31327775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Investigation of Radiation Dose Estimates and Image Quality Between Commercially Available Interventional Fluoroscopy Systems for Fluoroscopically Guided Interventional Procedures.
Trunz LM; Eschelman DJ; Gonsalves CF; Adamo RD; Dave JK
Acad Radiol; 2021 Nov; 28(11):1559-1569. PubMed ID: 32224035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography].
Hermann KP; Obenauer S; Grabbe E
Rofo; 2000 Nov; 172(11):940-5. PubMed ID: 11142129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Investigation of the effect of anode/filter materials on the dose and image quality of a digital mammography system based on an amorphous selenium flat panel detector.
Baldelli P; Phelan N; Egan G
Br J Radiol; 2010 Apr; 83(988):290-5. PubMed ID: 20019173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An approach for the online determination of Entrance Surface Air Kerma (ESAK) from Kerma Area product (P
Suliman II
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2022 Dec; 45(4):1055-1061. PubMed ID: 36107385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Impact of the X-ray system setting on patient dose and image quality; a case study with two interventional cardiology systems.
Vassileva J; Vano E; Ubeda C; Rehani M; Zotova R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jul; 155(3):329-34. PubMed ID: 23396881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Technical Note: Radiation dose reduction from computed tomography localizer radiographs using a tin spectral shaping filter.
Saltybaeva N; Krauss A; Alkadhi H
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):544-549. PubMed ID: 30578731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Risk factors of radiation dose in patients undergoing peripherally-inserted central catheter procedure using conventional angiography equipment and flat panel detector-based mobile C-arm fluoroscopy.
Lee T; Shin SW; Choi D; Cho SK; Hyun D; Do YS; Jeon S; Cha B; Bok EK; Kim S
Acta Radiol; 2014 Dec; 55(10):1234-8. PubMed ID: 24292900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of two angiographic systems in paediatric interventional cardiology.
Ubeda C; Vano E; Miranda P; Aguirre D; Riquelme N; Guarda E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):250-3. PubMed ID: 25843951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Contrast-detail phantom study for x-ray spectrum optimization regarding chest radiography using a cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector.
Hamer OW; Völk M; Zorger N; Borisch I; Büttner R; Feuerbach S; Strotzer M
Invest Radiol; 2004 Oct; 39(10):610-8. PubMed ID: 15377940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. X-ray spectroscopy applied to radiation shielding calculation in mammography.
Künzel R; Levenhagen RS; Herdade SB; Terini RA; Costa PR
Med Phys; 2008 Aug; 35(8):3539-45. PubMed ID: 18777914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of aluminum-copper alloy filtration on photon spectra, air kerma rate and image contrast.
Gonçalves A; Rollo JM; Gonçalves M; Haiter Neto F; Bóscolo FN
Braz Dent J; 2004; 15(3):214-9. PubMed ID: 15798826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Estimating pediatric entrance skin dose from digital radiography examination using DICOM metadata: A quality assurance tool.
Brady SL; Kaufman RA
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2489-97. PubMed ID: 25979042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. X-ray dose reduction using additional copper filtration for abdominal digital radiography: Evaluation using signal difference-to-noise ratio.
Kawashima H; Ichikawa K; Nagasou D; Hattori M
Phys Med; 2017 Feb; 34():65-71. PubMed ID: 28148466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Feasibility of real time dual-energy imaging based on a flat panel detector for coronary artery calcium quantification.
Xu T; Ducote JL; Wong JT; Molloi S
Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1612-22. PubMed ID: 16872069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
