146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37733249)
1. Comparison of shear bond strength and residual adhesive remnants on the enamel surface after debonding of three different orthodontic molar tubes : A scanning electron microscope study.
Öncel NA; Ulusoy N; Ulusoy C
J Orofac Orthop; 2024 May; 85(Suppl 1):94-101. PubMed ID: 37733249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Different Adhesive Resin Removal Methods after Debonding Ceramic Orthodontic Molar Tubes: A Scanning Electron Microscope Study.
Atmaca Z; Ulusoy M; Ulusoy C
Scanning; 2022; 2022():4853035. PubMed ID: 36474710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of debonding characteristics of a new collapsible ceramic bracket.
Bishara SE; Olsen ME; Von Wald L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Nov; 112(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 9387843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic molar tubes bonded using hydrophilic primers: An in vitro study.
Hadrous R; Bouserhal J; Osman E
Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):461-468. PubMed ID: 31278045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the debonding characteristics of two innovative ceramic bracket designs.
Bishara SE; Olsen ME; VonWald L; Jakobsen JR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 10393585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Shear bond strength of metallic and ceramic brackets using color change adhesives.
Stumpf Ade S; Bergmann C; Prietsch JR; Vicenzi J
Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 23916435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of bond strength between a conventional resin adhesive and a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive: an in vitro and in vivo study.
Summers A; Kao E; Gilmore J; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Aug; 126(2):200-6; quiz 254-5. PubMed ID: 15316475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Physical and adhesive properties of dental enamel after radiotherapy and bonding of metal and ceramic brackets.
Santin GC; Palma-Dibb RG; Romano FL; de Oliveira HF; Nelson Filho P; de Queiroz AM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Aug; 148(2):283-92. PubMed ID: 26232837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Shear bond strength of two 2-step etch-and-rinse adhesives when bonding ceramic brackets to bovine enamel.
Godard M; Deuve B; Lopez I; Hippolyte MP; Barthélemi S
Int Orthod; 2017 Sep; 15(3):388-404. PubMed ID: 28755867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the re-bond strength of debonded metal and ceramic brackets following Er: YAG laser treatment.
Zheng X; Huang X
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):710. PubMed ID: 38902669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of enamel sealing on shear bond strength and the adhesive remnant index : Study of three fluoride-releasing adhesives in combination with metal and ceramic brackets.
Hofmann E; Elsner L; Hirschfelder U; Ebert T; Hanke S
J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Jan; 78(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 27896419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of Primer Pre-curing and Co-curing on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Using Three Light-cure Adhesive Systems: An
Vattaparambil S; Shaloob M; Antony V; Roshan G; Parayaruthottam P; Odayappurath MJ
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Sep; 23(9):900-906. PubMed ID: 37282997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Shear bond resistance and enamel surface comparison after the bonding and debonding of ceramic and metallic brackets.
da Rocha JM; Gravina MA; da Silva Campos MJ; Quintão CC; Elias CN; Vitral RW
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 24713563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of 445-nm Diode Laser-Assisted Debonding of Self-Ligating Ceramic Brackets on Shear Bond Strength.
Stein S; Hellak A; Schauseil M; Korbmacher-Steiner H; Braun A
Photomed Laser Surg; 2018 Jan; 36(1):31-36. PubMed ID: 29016236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shear bond strength of brackets on restorative materials: Comparison on various dental restorative materials using the universal primer Monobond® Plus.
Ebert T; Elsner L; Hirschfelder U; Hanke S
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Mar; 77(2):73-84. PubMed ID: 26895024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different conditioning methods.
Elekdag-Turk S; Isci D; Ozkalayci N; Turk T
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 19164413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to enamel with amorphous calcium phosphate-containing orthodontic composite.
Uysal T; Ustdal A; Nur M; Catalbas B
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 20080960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength of different orthodontic adhesives.
Bishara SE; Laffoon JF; Vonwald L; Warren JJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 May; 121(5):521-5. PubMed ID: 12045771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of shear bond strength and ARI of four different adhesive systems used to bond molar tubes: An in vitro study.
Griffin J; Ruddy M; Mavreas D; Nace S; Vande Vannet B; Stanton KT
Int Orthod; 2021 Mar; 19(1):117-122. PubMed ID: 33246877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of stresses developed in different bracket-cement-enamel systems using finite element analysis with in vitro bond strength tests.
Elsaka SE; Hammad SM; Ibrahim NF
Prog Orthod; 2014 Apr; 15(1):33. PubMed ID: 24934213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
