These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37733350)

  • 1. Validation of the Waterloo Differential Visual Acuity Test (WatDAT) and Comparison With Existing Pediatric Tests of Visual Acuity.
    Opoku-Yamoah V; Christian LW; Irving EL; Jones D; McCulloch D; Rose K; Leat SJ
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2023 Sep; 12(9):13. PubMed ID: 37733350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring recognition visual acuity in young children - testability with the Waterloo Differential Acuity Test (WatDAT).
    Leat SJ; Saraf A; Rose K; Christian LW; Irving EL; Jones D; McCulloch DL
    Clin Exp Optom; 2023 Nov; 106(8):883-889. PubMed ID: 36403264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of simulated refractive error on adult visual acuity for paediatric tests.
    Paudel N; Jacobs RJ; Sloan R; Denny S; Shea K; Thompson B; Anstice N
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):521-530. PubMed ID: 28656671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do picture-based charts overestimate visual acuity? Comparison of Kay Pictures, Lea Symbols, HOTV and Keeler logMAR charts with Sloan letters in adults and children.
    Anstice NS; Jacobs RJ; Simkin SK; Thomson M; Thompson B; Collins AV
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0170839. PubMed ID: 28152076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Agreement between Lea Symbols and Patti Pics visual acuity in children and adults.
    Sapkota A; Sitaula S; Shrestha GS; Joshi ND; Koirala B; Paudel N
    J Optom; 2023; 16(3):229-235. PubMed ID: 36717317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of an automated-ETDRS near and intermediate visual acuity measurement.
    Pang Y; Sparschu L; Nylin E
    Clin Exp Optom; 2020 Sep; 103(5):663-667. PubMed ID: 31822041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing Visual Acuity Measured by Lea Symbols and Patti Pics.
    Singman EL; Matta NS; Tian J; Silbert DI
    Am Orthopt J; 2015; 65():94-8. PubMed ID: 26564933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual Acuity Testing Using a Random Method Visual Acuity Application.
    Rhiu S; Lee HJ; Goo YS; Cho K; Kim JH
    Telemed J E Health; 2016 Mar; 22(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 26280910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Design and Validation of a Novel Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Test: The K-VA Test.
    Karampatakis V; Almaliotis D; Talimtzi P; Almpanidou S
    Ophthalmol Ther; 2023 Jun; 12(3):1657-1670. PubMed ID: 36961662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Patti Pics and Lea Symbols optotypes in children and adults.
    Mercer ME; Drover JR; Penney KJ; Courage ML; Adams RJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Mar; 90(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 23376895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of Lea Symbol vs ETDRS letter distance visual acuity in a population of young children with a high prevalence of astigmatism.
    Dobson V; Clifford-Donaldson CE; Miller JM; Garvey KA; Harvey EM
    J AAPOS; 2009 Jun; 13(3):253-7. PubMed ID: 19345596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repeatability of an automated Landolt C test, compared with the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) chart testing.
    Ruamviboonsuk P; Tiensuwan M; Kunawut C; Masayaanon P
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Oct; 136(4):662-9. PubMed ID: 14516806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of printed and computerised crowded Kay picture logMAR tests against gold standard ETDRS acuity test chart measurements in adult and amblyopic paediatric subjects.
    Shah N; Laidlaw DA; Rashid S; Hysi P
    Eye (Lond); 2012 Apr; 26(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 22193878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison of visometry by Sivtsev and ETDRS charts].
    Chedly M; Aslamazova AE; Blinova IV; Golovchenko AV; Siplivy VI
    Vestn Oftalmol; 2022; 138(4):35-40. PubMed ID: 36004589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shortening the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity test utilizing a novel computer software: reproducibility in control and patient eyes.
    Cohen ADN; Mimouni M; El-Yaniv R; Blumenthal EZ
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2021 Dec; 99(8):e1281-e1288. PubMed ID: 33742567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of logMAR ETDRS chart and a new computerised staircased procedure for assessment of the visual acuity of children.
    Stewart CE; Hussey A; Davies N; Moseley MJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Nov; 26(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 17040424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between Different Visual Acuity Tests and Validation of a Digital Device.
    Montori B; Pérez Roche T; Vilella M; López E; Alejandre A; Pan X; Ortín M; Lacort M; Pueyo V
    Vision (Basel); 2024 Sep; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 39330761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of a computerised visual acuity measurement device in subjects with age-related macular degeneration: comparison with gold standard ETDRS chart measurements.
    Bokinni Y; Shah N; Maguire O; Laidlaw DA
    Eye (Lond); 2015 Aug; 29(8):1085-91. PubMed ID: 26043703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing LEA numbers low vision book and Feinbloom visual acuity charts.
    Hardgrave N; Hatley J; Lewerenz D
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Nov; 89(11):1611-8. PubMed ID: 23026789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Construction and Validation of LEA Hindi Chart: A Multicenter Study.
    Datta S; Varadharajan S; Mazumdar D; Narayanan A; Monira S; Panda S; Hyvärinen L; Satgunam P
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 May; 97(5):351-359. PubMed ID: 32413007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.