BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37733459)

  • 21. Variation within physical and digital craniometrics.
    Lee M; Gerdau-Radonic K
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Jan; 306():110092. PubMed ID: 31816484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Application of FORDISC 3.0 to explore differences among crania of North American and South African blacks and whites.
    L'Abbé EN; Kenyhercz M; Stull KE; Keough N; Nawrocki S
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Nov; 58(6):1579-83. PubMed ID: 23865813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cranial measures and ancient DNA both show greater similarity of Neandertals to recent modern Eurasians than to recent modern sub-Saharan Africans.
    Relethford JH; Smith FH
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2018 May; 166(1):170-178. PubMed ID: 29355893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Purkait's triangle revisited: role in sex and ancestry estimation.
    Attia MH; Attia MH; Farghaly YT; Abulnoor BAE; Manolis SK; Purkait R; Ubelaker DH
    Forensic Sci Res; 2022; 7(3):440-455. PubMed ID: 36353330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cranial morphological variation among contemporary Mexicans: Regional trends, ancestral affinities, and genetic comparisons.
    Hughes CE; Tise ML; Trammell LH; Anderson BE
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2013 Aug; 151(4):506-17. PubMed ID: 23754454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluating the Accuracy of Cranial Indices in Ancestry Estimation Among South African Groups.
    Liebenberg L; Stull KE; L'Abbé EN; Botha D
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Sep; 60(5):1277-82. PubMed ID: 25772025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).
    Foffi G; Pastore A; Piazza F; Temussi PA
    Phys Biol; 2013 Aug; 10(4):040301. PubMed ID: 23912807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Technical note: comparability of Hrdlička's Catalog of Crania data based on measurement landmark definitions.
    Stojanowski CM; Euber JK
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2011 Sep; 146(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 21766286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Morphometric Outline Analysis of Ancestry and Sex Differences in Cranial Shape.
    Murphy RE; Garvin HM
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jul; 63(4):1001-1009. PubMed ID: 29193064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Beyond Taphonomy: Exploring Craniometric Variation Among Anatomical Material.
    Hefner JT; Spatola BF; Passalacqua NV; Gocha TP
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Nov; 61(6):1440-1449. PubMed ID: 27501076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. On the use of machine learning algorithms in forensic anthropology.
    Nikita E; Nikitas P
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2020 Nov; 47():101771. PubMed ID: 32795933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Geometric morphometrics on juvenile crania: Exploring age and sex variation in an Australian population.
    Noble J; Cardini A; Flavel A; Franklin D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jan; 294():57-68. PubMed ID: 30453177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The vanishing Black Indian: Revisiting craniometry and historic collections.
    Geller PL; Stojanowksi CM
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2017 Feb; 162(2):267-284. PubMed ID: 27753072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Craniometric variation among modern human populations.
    Relethford JH
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1994 Sep; 95(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 7527996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Probabilistic ancestry maps: a method to assess and visualize population substructures in genetics.
    Gaspar HA; Breen G
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Mar; 20(1):116. PubMed ID: 30845922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Geographic substructure in craniometric estimates of admixture for contemporary American populations.
    Algee-Hewitt BFB
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2017 Oct; 164(2):260-280. PubMed ID: 28636089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy Rates of Ancestry Estimation by Forensic Anthropologists Using Identified Forensic Cases.
    Thomas RM; Parks CL; Richard AH
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Jul; 62(4):971-974. PubMed ID: 28133721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sex and ancestry assessment of Brazilian crania using semi-automatic mesh processing tools.
    Jurda M; Urbanová P
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2016 Nov; 23():34-43. PubMed ID: 27890100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Biocrust morphogroups provide an effective and rapid assessment tool for drylands.
    Read CF; Duncan DH; Vesk PA; Elith J; Wan S
    J Appl Ecol; 2014 Dec; 51(6):1740-1749. PubMed ID: 25598550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Stature estimation using measurements of the cranium for populations in the United States.
    Kyllonen KM; Simmons-Ehrhardt T; Monson KL
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Dec; 281():184.e1-184.e9. PubMed ID: 29129342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.