These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37733621)

  • 1. Challenges in Interpretation of US Breast Findings in the Emergency Setting.
    Morozova A; Cotes C; Aran S; Singh H
    Radiographics; 2023 Oct; 43(10):e230020. PubMed ID: 37733621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contrast-enhanced Mammography: Current Applications and Future Directions.
    Ghaderi KF; Phillips J; Perry H; Lotfi P; Mehta TS
    Radiographics; 2019; 39(7):1907-1920. PubMed ID: 31697627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reporting and Perceptions of Breast Arterial Calcification on Mammography: A Survey of ACR Radiologists.
    Brown AL; Wahab RA; Zhang B; Smetherman DH; Mahoney MC
    Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S192-S198. PubMed ID: 33610451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The current state of the diagnostics of breast diseases in Lombardy].
    Vergnaghi D; Panizza P; Gozzi G
    Radiol Med; 2000 Nov; 100(5):314-20. PubMed ID: 11213407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast Imaging and Intervention during Pregnancy and Lactation.
    Peterson MS; Gegios AR; Elezaby MA; Salkowski LR; Woods RW; Narayan AK; Strigel RM; Roy M; Fowler AM
    Radiographics; 2023 Oct; 43(10):e230014. PubMed ID: 37708073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Physics, Artifacts, and Quality Control Considerations.
    Tirada N; Li G; Dreizin D; Robinson L; Khorjekar G; Dromi S; Ernst T
    Radiographics; 2019; 39(2):413-426. PubMed ID: 30768362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Calcifications at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Imaging Features and Biopsy Techniques.
    Horvat JV; Keating DM; Rodrigues-Duarte H; Morris EA; Mango VL
    Radiographics; 2019; 39(2):307-318. PubMed ID: 30681901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography Recall and False-Positive Rates by Time of Day and Reader Experience.
    Bernstein MH; Baird GL; Lourenco AP
    Radiology; 2022 Apr; 303(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 35014905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What's new in mammography.
    Simonetti G; Cossu E; Montanaro M; Caschili C; Giuliani V
    Eur J Radiol; 1998 May; 27 Suppl 2():S234-41. PubMed ID: 9652528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms.
    Elmore JG; Wells CK; Lee CH; Howard DH; Feinstein AR
    N Engl J Med; 1994 Dec; 331(22):1493-9. PubMed ID: 7969300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast problems presenting in the emergency room.
    Hines N; Leibman AJ; David M
    Emerg Radiol; 2007 Apr; 14(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17342468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the applicability of BI-RADS® MRI for the interpretation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography.
    Travieso-Aja MM; Maldonado-Saluzzi D; Naranjo-Santana P; Fernández-Ruiz C; Severino-Rondón W; Rodríguez Rodríguez M; Luzardo OP
    Radiologia (Engl Ed); 2019; 61(6):477-488. PubMed ID: 31262509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiologist Characteristics Associated with Interpretive Performance of Screening Mammography: A National Mammography Database (NMD) Study.
    Lee CS; Moy L; Hughes D; Golden D; Bhargavan-Chatfield M; Hemingway J; Geras A; Duszak R; Rosenkrantz AB
    Radiology; 2021 Sep; 300(3):518-528. PubMed ID: 34156300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Current Recommendations for Breast Imaging of the Pregnant and Lactating Patient.
    Kieturakis AJ; Wahab RA; Vijapura C; Mahoney MC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Jun; 216(6):1462-1475. PubMed ID: 32755376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Role of mammography in women under 35 years of age].
    Panzarola P; Bellucci MC
    Radiol Med; 1991; 81(1-2):62-4. PubMed ID: 2006338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiologist-Patient Communication: Current Practices and Barriers to Communication in Breast Imaging.
    Aminololama-Shakeri S; Soo MS; Grimm LJ; Watts MR; Poplack SP; Rapelyea J; Saphier N; Stack R; Destounis S
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 May; 16(5):709-716. PubMed ID: 30580958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Mammary echography. Comparison with mammography].
    Pignatelli V; Ruiu U; Savino A
    Radiol Med; 1986 Mar; 72(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 3517977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Addition of Screening Breast US to Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Average Risk.
    Yi A; Jang MJ; Yim D; Kwon BR; Shin SU; Chang JM
    Radiology; 2021 Mar; 298(3):568-575. PubMed ID: 33434108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Responding to the challenges of breast cancer in egypt and other arab countries.
    El Saghir NS
    J Egypt Natl Canc Inst; 2008 Dec; 20(4):309-12. PubMed ID: 20571588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Developing Asymmetries at Mammography: A Multimodality Approach to Assessment and Management.
    Chesebro AL; Winkler NS; Birdwell RL; Giess CS
    Radiographics; 2016; 36(2):322-34. PubMed ID: 26963449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.