156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37734092)
21. Validation of updated antenatal vaginal birth after caesarean section prediction model without race and ethnicity in Australia.
Liu CZ; Mahomed K
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2023 Jun; 63(3):314-320. PubMed ID: 36259468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Racial/Ethnic Differences in Socioeconomic Status and Medical Correlates of Trial of Labor After Cesarean and Vaginal Birth After Cesarean.
Attanasio LB; Paterno MT
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2021 Dec; 30(12):1788-1794. PubMed ID: 33719567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
Costantine MM; Fox K; Byers BD; Mateus J; Ghulmiyyah LM; Blackwell S; Hankins GDV; Grobman WA; Saade G
Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 114(5):1029-1033. PubMed ID: 20168103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Influencing factors and antenatal assessment of the vaginal birth after cesarean section].
Guo N; Bai RM; Qu PF; Huang P; He YP; Wang CL; Mi Y
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 54(6):369-374. PubMed ID: 31262120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of trial of labor compared with elective cesarean delivery according to predicted likelihood of vaginal delivery.
Downs S; Mokhtari N; Gold S; Ghofranian A; Kawakita T
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(26):10487-10493. PubMed ID: 36216354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Are prediction models for vaginal birth after cesarean accurate?
Harris BS; Heine RP; Park J; Faurot KR; Hopkins MK; Rivara AJ; Kemeny HR; Grotegut CA; Jelovsek JE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 220(5):492.e1-492.e7. PubMed ID: 30716285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Validation of a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model in women with two prior cesarean deliveries.
Metz TD; Allshouse AA; Faucett AM; Grobman WA
Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 125(4):948-952. PubMed ID: 25751218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cesarean Delivery and Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery Rates in a First Nations Community-Based Obstetrical Program in Northwestern Ontario.
Dooley J; Jumah N; Okenden H; Madden S; Bollinger M; Sprague C; Willms H; Hummelen R; Gerber Finn L; Kelly L
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2020 May; 42(5):601-606. PubMed ID: 31987756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Planned mode of delivery after previous cesarean section and short-term maternal and perinatal outcomes: A population-based record linkage cohort study in Scotland.
Fitzpatrick KE; Kurinczuk JJ; Bhattacharya S; Quigley MA
PLoS Med; 2019 Sep; 16(9):e1002913. PubMed ID: 31550245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Calculators Estimating the Likelihood of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: Uses and Perceptions.
Thornton PD; Liese K; Adlam K; Erbe K; McFarlin BL
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2020 Sep; 65(5):621-626. PubMed ID: 32749063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Japanese women.
Yokoi A; Ishikawa K; Miyazaki K; Yoshida K; Furuhashi M; Tamakoshi K
Int J Med Sci; 2012; 9(6):488-91. PubMed ID: 22927774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Quality Initiative to Reduce Failed Trial of Labor after Cesarean Using Calculated VBAC Success Likelihood.
Williams FB; Pierce H; McBride CA; DeAngelis J; McLean K
Am J Perinatol; 2023 Apr; 40(6):575-581. PubMed ID: 36228652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Clinical study on vaginal birth after cesarean].
He L; Chen M; He GL; Liu XX
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 51(8):586-91. PubMed ID: 27561937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Racial bias in cesarean decision-making.
Edwards SE; Class QA; Ford CE; Alexander TA; Fleisher JD
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 May; 5(5):100927. PubMed ID: 36921720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Demographic, Socioeconomic, Health Systems, and Geographic Factors Associated with Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: An Analysis of 2017 U.S. Birth Certificate Data.
Basile Ibrahim B; Kennedy HP; Holland ML
Matern Child Health J; 2021 Jul; 25(7):1069-1080. PubMed ID: 33201453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. African American Women's Experiences with Birth After a Prior Cesarean Section.
Miller MW; Baker S
Matern Child Health J; 2022 Apr; 26(4):806-813. PubMed ID: 34731358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights.
Guise JM; Eden K; Emeis C; Denman MA; Marshall N; Fu RR; Janik R; Nygren P; Walker M; McDonagh M
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep); 2010 Mar; (191):1-397. PubMed ID: 20629481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Understanding Factors Leading to Primary Cesarean Section and Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery in the Friuli-Venezia Giulia Region (North-Eastern Italy), 2005-2015.
Cegolon L; Mastrangelo G; Maso G; Dal Pozzo G; Ronfani L; Cegolon A; Heymann WC; Barbone F
Sci Rep; 2020 Jan; 10(1):380. PubMed ID: 31941963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Disparities by race/ethnicity in unplanned cesarean birth among healthy nulliparas: a secondary analysis of the nuMoM2b dataset.
Carlson NS; Carlson MS; Erickson EN; Higgins M; Britt AJ; Amore AD
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2023 May; 23(1):342. PubMed ID: 37173616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Trends in cesarean birth and vaginal birth after previous cesarean, 1991-99.
Menacker F; Curtin SC
Natl Vital Stat Rep; 2001 Dec; 49(13):1-16. PubMed ID: 11793867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
