These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37734339)
1. Uncertainty quantification of the effect of cardiac position variability in the inverse problem of electrocardiographic imaging. Bergquist JA; Zenger B; Rupp LC; Busatto A; Tate J; Brooks DH; Narayan A; MacLeod RS Physiol Meas; 2023 Oct; 44(10):. PubMed ID: 37734339 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Simultaneous Multi-Heartbeat ECGI Solution with a Time-Varying Forward Model: a Joint Inverse Formulation. Bergquist JA; Coll-Font J; Zenger B; Rupp LC; Good WW; Brooks DH; MacLeod RS Funct Imaging Model Heart; 2021 Jun; 12738():493-502. PubMed ID: 34447971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Uncertainty Quantification of the Effects of Segmentation Variability in ECGI. Tate JD; Good W; Zemzemi N; Boonstra M; van Dam P; Brooks DH; Narayan A; MacLeod RS Funct Imaging Model Heart; 2021 Jun; 12738():515-522. PubMed ID: 35449797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reconstruction of cardiac position using body surface potentials. Bergquist JA; Coll-Font J; Zenger B; Rupp LC; Good WW; Brooks DH; MacLeod RS Comput Biol Med; 2022 Mar; 142():105174. PubMed ID: 35065409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Solving the inverse problem in electrocardiography imaging for atrial fibrillation using various time-frequency decomposition techniques based on empirical mode decomposition: A comparative study. Yadan Z; Xin L; Jian W Front Physiol; 2022; 13():999900. PubMed ID: 36406997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Segmentation Uncertainty on the ECGI Inverse Problem Solution and Source Localization. Gassa N; Boonstra M; Ondrusova B; Svehlikova J; Brooks D; Narayan A; Rababah AS; van Dam P; MacLeod R; Tate J; Zemzemi N Comput Cardiol (2010); 2022 Sep; 49():. PubMed ID: 37786732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrocardiographic Imaging: A Comparison of Iterative Solvers. Borràs M; Chamorro-Servent J Front Physiol; 2021; 12():620250. PubMed ID: 33613311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comprehensive Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis for Cardiac Action Potential Models. Pathmanathan P; Cordeiro JM; Gray RA Front Physiol; 2019; 10():721. PubMed ID: 31297060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robustness of imageless electrocardiographic imaging against uncertainty in atrial morphology and location. Molero R; González-Ascaso A; Climent AM; Guillem MS J Electrocardiol; 2023; 77():58-61. PubMed ID: 36634462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of Heart Rate and Ventricular Wall Thickness on Non-invasive Mapping: An Perez Alday EA; Whittaker DG; Benson AP; Colman MA Front Physiol; 2019; 10():308. PubMed ID: 31024330 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Tracking the Position of the Heart From Body Surface Potential Maps and Electrograms. Coll-Font J; Brooks DH Front Physiol; 2018; 9():1727. PubMed ID: 30559678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using UncertainSCI to Quantify Uncertainty in Cardiac Simulations. Rupp LC; Liu Z; Bergquist JA; Rampersad S; White D; Tate JD; Brooks DH; Narayan A; MacLeod RS Comput Cardiol (2010); 2020 Sep; 47():. PubMed ID: 36845870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sensitivity analysis and inverse uncertainty quantification for the left ventricular passive mechanics. Lazarus A; Dalton D; Husmeier D; Gao H Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2022 Jun; 21(3):953-982. PubMed ID: 35377030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrocardiographic Imaging for Atrial Fibrillation: A Perspective From Computer Models and Animal Experiments to Clinical Value. Salinet J; Molero R; Schlindwein FS; Karel J; Rodrigo M; Rojo-Álvarez JL; Berenfeld O; Climent AM; Zenger B; Vanheusden F; Paredes JGS; MacLeod R; Atienza F; Guillem MS; Cluitmans M; Bonizzi P Front Physiol; 2021; 12():653013. PubMed ID: 33995122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantifying and Visualizing Uncertainty for Source Localization in Electrocardiographic Imaging. Njeru DK; Athawale TM; France JJ; Johnson CR Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng Imaging Vis; 2023; 11(3):812-822. PubMed ID: 37284179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An expert review of the inverse problem in electrocardiographic imaging for the non-invasive identification of atrial fibrillation drivers. Yadan Z; Jian L; Jian W; Yifu L; Haiying L; Hairui L Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Oct; 240():107676. PubMed ID: 37343376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electrocardiographic imaging in the atria. Hernández-Romero I; Molero R; Fambuena-Santos C; Herrero-Martín C; Climent AM; Guillem MS Med Biol Eng Comput; 2023 Apr; 61(4):879-896. PubMed ID: 36370321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optical Imaging of Ventricular Action Potentials in a Torso Tank: A New Platform for Non-Invasive Electrocardiographic Imaging Validation. Bear LR; Walton RD; Abell E; Coudière Y; Haissaguerre M; Bernus O; Dubois R Front Physiol; 2019; 10():146. PubMed ID: 30863318 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Uncertainty quantification via localized gradients for deep learning-based medical image assessments. Schott B; Pinchuk D; Santoro-Fernandes V; Klaneček Ž; Rivetti L; Deatsch A; Perlman S; Li Y; Jeraj R Phys Med Biol; 2024 Jul; 69(15):. PubMed ID: 38981594 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Uncertainty in cardiac myofiber orientation and stiffnesses dominate the variability of left ventricle deformation response. Rodríguez-Cantano R; Sundnes J; Rognes ME Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2019 May; 35(5):e3178. PubMed ID: 30632711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]