These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37734603)

  • 1. One-third of cropland within protected areas could be retired in China for inferior sustainability and effects.
    Yang R; Xiao W; Ye Y; Wang K; Dong X; Chen S
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Dec; 905():167084. PubMed ID: 37734603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pervasive cropland in protected areas highlight trade-offs between conservation and food security.
    Vijay V; Armsworth PR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jan; 118(4):. PubMed ID: 33468666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impacts of cropland balance policy on habitat quality in China: A multiscale administrative perspective.
    Zheng W; Li S; Ke X; Li X; Zhang B
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Dec; 323():116182. PubMed ID: 36122492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A framework for identifying bird conservation priority areas in croplands at national level.
    Hou S; Yang R; Cao Y; Zhao Z; Peng Q; Wang H; Si Y
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Dec; 324():116330. PubMed ID: 36208513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of Cereal Production Displacement from Urban Expansion on Ecosystem Service Values in China: Based on Three Cropland Supplement Strategies.
    Sheng S; Yang B; Kuang B
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Apr; 19(8):. PubMed ID: 35457431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impacts of cropland expansion on carbon storage: A case study in Hubei, China.
    Tang L; Ke X; Zhou T; Zheng W; Wang L
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Jul; 265():110515. PubMed ID: 32275243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Global cropland could be almost halved: Assessment of land saving potentials under different strategies and implications for agricultural markets.
    Schneider JM; Zabel F; Schünemann F; Delzeit R; Mauser W
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0263063. PubMed ID: 35192630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biodiversity loss through cropland displacement for urban expansion in China.
    Li F; Wu S; Liu H; Yan D
    Sci Total Environ; 2024 Jan; 907():167988. PubMed ID: 37875196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Global agriculture and carbon trade-offs.
    Johnson JA; Runge CF; Senauer B; Foley J; Polasky S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Aug; 111(34):12342-7. PubMed ID: 25114254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Natural capital investments in China undermined by reclamation for cropland.
    Kong L; Wu T; Xiao Y; Xu W; Zhang X; Daily GC; Ouyang Z
    Nat Ecol Evol; 2023 Nov; 7(11):1771-1777. PubMed ID: 37749401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Global projections of future cropland expansion to 2050 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon storage.
    Molotoks A; Stehfest E; Doelman J; Albanito F; Fitton N; Dawson TP; Smith P
    Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Dec; 24(12):5895-5908. PubMed ID: 30267559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial optimization of urban land and cropland based on land production capacity to balance cropland protection and ecological conservation.
    Wang L; Zheng W; Tang L; Zhang S; Liu Y; Ke X
    J Environ Manage; 2021 May; 285():112054. PubMed ID: 33556701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Spider diversity and community characteristics in cropland and two kinds of recovery habitats in Bashang area, China].
    Hu WH; Duan MC; Na SH; Zhang F; Yu ZR
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2020 Feb; 31(2):643-650. PubMed ID: 32476359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response and multiscenario simulation of trade-offs/synergies among ecosystem services to the Grain to Green Program: a case study of the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration, China.
    Chen T; Peng L; Wang Q
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(22):33572-33586. PubMed ID: 35029821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ecosystem services in conservation planning: Assessing compatible vs. incompatible conservation.
    Fang C; Cai Z; Devlin AT; Yan X; Chen H; Zeng X; Xia Y; Zhang Q
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Jun; 312():114906. PubMed ID: 35390611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dramatic cropland expansion in Myanmar following political reforms threatens biodiversity.
    Zhang Y; Prescott GW; Tay RE; Dickens BL; Webb EL; Htun S; Tizard RJ; Rao M; Carrasco LR
    Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):16558. PubMed ID: 30409993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Land-use trade-offs between tree biodiversity and crop production in the Atlantic Forest.
    Marcilio-Silva V; Marques MCM; Cavender-Bares J
    Conserv Biol; 2018 Oct; 32(5):1074-1084. PubMed ID: 29790203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An ecological footprint approach for cropland use sustainability based on multi-objective optimization modelling.
    Li M; Zhou Y; Wang Y; Singh VP; Li Z; Li Y
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Nov; 273():111147. PubMed ID: 32768762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pasture intensification is insufficient to relieve pressure on conservation priority areas in open agricultural markets.
    Kreidenweis U; Humpenöder F; Kehoe L; Kuemmerle T; Bodirsky BL; Lotze-Campen H; Popp A
    Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Jul; 24(7):3199-3213. PubMed ID: 29665157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the ecological risk of croplands in loess drylands by combining environmental disturbance with ecosystem vulnerability.
    Qiu M; Fu M; Zhang Z; Fu S; Yuan C
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Dec; 347():119231. PubMed ID: 37804628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.