These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3773492)

  • 1. Comparison of in-the-ear and over-the-ear hearing aid fittings.
    Cox RM; Risberg DM
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1986 Nov; 51(4):362-9. PubMed ID: 3773492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effects of Manufacturer's Prefit and Real-Ear Fitting on the Predicted Speech Perception of Children with Severe to Profound Hearing Loss.
    Quar TK; Umat C; Chew YY
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):346-356. PubMed ID: 30461383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech recognition with in-the-ear and behind-the-ear dual-microphone hearing instruments.
    Pumford JM; Seewald RC; Scollie SD; Jenstad LM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2000 Jan; 11(1):23-35. PubMed ID: 10741354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individualized correction factors in the preselection of hearing aids.
    Fikret-Pasa S; Revit LJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Apr; 35(2):384-400. PubMed ID: 1573878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of three hearing aid fittings using the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) Test.
    Surr RK; Fabry DA
    Ear Hear; 1991 Feb; 12(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 2026286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of compression and hearing aid style on directional hearing aid benefit and performance.
    Ricketts T; Lindley G; Henry P
    Ear Hear; 2001 Aug; 22(4):348-61. PubMed ID: 11527041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Hearing Aid Manufacturers' Software-Derived Fittings to DSL v5.0 Pediatric Targets.
    Folkeard P; Bagatto M; Scollie S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 May; 31(5):354-362. PubMed ID: 31639078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hearing aid microphone location effects on speech discrimination in noise.
    Franks JR; Feth LL; Daniloff RG
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(6):241-50. PubMed ID: 7308598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ability to achieve gain/frequency response and SSPL-90 under three prescription formulas with in-the-ear hearing aids.
    Sammeth CA; Peek BF; Bratt GW; Bess FH; Amberg SM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 Jan; 4(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 8422481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of functional gain and 2 cm3 coupler gain.
    Hawkins DB; Haskell GB
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1982 Feb; 47(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 7176579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech understanding and directional hearing for hearing-impaired subjects with in-the-ear and behind-the-ear hearing aids.
    Leeuw AR; Dreschler WA
    Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 3589478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of an in-situ output probe-microphone method for hearing aid fitting verification.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 1990 Feb; 11(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 2307301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ear asymmetries and asymmetric directional microphone hearing aid fittings.
    Cord MT; Surr RK; Walden BE; Dittberner AB
    Am J Audiol; 2011 Dec; 20(2):111-22. PubMed ID: 21764997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The efficacy of the Prescription of Gain/Output (POGO) in fitting hearing aids to mild and moderate sensorineural hearing losses.
    Thorpe S; Jardine C
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 1994; 41():65-72. PubMed ID: 8602544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
    Ricketts TA; Picou EM
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of microphone location in ITE versus BTE hearing aids.
    Gartrell EL; Church GT
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1990 Jul; 1(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 2132598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech perception outcomes in hearing-impaired individuals with microphone & receiver in the ear (M&RIE) hearing aids.
    Chaithra MC; Manjula P
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jul; 281(7):3813-3820. PubMed ID: 38642084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
    Hornsby BW; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of custom in-the-ear hearing aids.
    Navarro MR
    Ear Hear; 1980; 1(3):167-75. PubMed ID: 7390075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.