These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3773492)

  • 21. Analysis of hearing aid fittings using insertion gain measurements.
    Ringdahl A; Leijon A; Lidén G
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 6494804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Optimising hearing aid output to paediatric prescriptive targets improves outcomes in children.
    Amri NA; Quar TK; Chong FY; Bagatto M
    Int J Audiol; 2022 Nov; 61(11):924-931. PubMed ID: 34859745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of the speech intelligibility rating (SIR) test for hearing aid comparisons.
    McDaniel DM; Cox RM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Jun; 35(3):686-93. PubMed ID: 1608261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Preference for and performance with damped and undamped hearing aids by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Davis LA; Davidson SA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Jun; 39(3):483-93. PubMed ID: 8783128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Review of recent research on the selection of frequency-gain characteristics for hearing aids.
    Lippmann R
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1980; 89(5 Pt 2):79-83. PubMed ID: 6786197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prescribed clinician-fit versus as-worn coupler gain in a group of elderly hearing-aid wearers.
    Humes LE; Barlow NN; Garner CB; Wilson DL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Aug; 43(4):879-92. PubMed ID: 11386475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Preferred hearing aid gain and bass-cut in relation to prescriptive fitting.
    Leijon A; Eriksson-Mangold M; Bech-Karlsen A
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 6494801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Harmonic distortion measurements in clinical hearing and fitting. Preliminary report.
    Nielsen HB; Nielsen H; Parving A
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 2336541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Linear and nonlinear hearing aid fittings--1. Patterns of benefit.
    Gatehouse S; Naylor G; Elberling C
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Mar; 45(3):130-52. PubMed ID: 16579490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparisons of speech recognition in noise by mildly-to-moderately hearing-impaired children using hearing aids and FM systems.
    Hawkins DB
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1984 Nov; 49(4):409-18. PubMed ID: 6503247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Wireless and acoustic hearing with bone-anchored hearing devices.
    Bosman AJ; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 55(7):419-24. PubMed ID: 27176657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The performance of an automatic acoustic-based program classifier compared to hearing aid users' manual selection of listening programs.
    Searchfield GD; Linford T; Kobayashi K; Crowhen D; Latzel M
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):201-212. PubMed ID: 29069954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Damping the hearing aid frequency response: effects on speech clarity and preferred listening level.
    Cox RM; Gilmore C
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Sep; 29(3):357-65. PubMed ID: 3762099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods.
    Moore BC; Sęk A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 22878351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of speech intelligibility in quiet and in noise after hearing aid fitting according to a purely prescriptive and a comparative fitting procedure.
    Metselaar M; Maat B; Krijnen P; Verschuure H; Dreschler W; Feenstra L
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Sep; 265(9):1113-20. PubMed ID: 18246361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of a pinna compensation algorithm for sound localization and speech perception in noise.
    Kuk F; Korhonen P; Lau C; Keenan D; Norgaard M
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 23275583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Speech intelligibility enhancement using hearing-aid array processing.
    Saunders GH; Kates JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Sep; 102(3):1827-37. PubMed ID: 9301060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Manufacturer predicted and measured REAR values in adult hearing aid fitting: accuracy and clinical usefulness.
    Aarts NL; Caffee CS
    Int J Audiol; 2005 May; 44(5):293-301. PubMed ID: 16028792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of Hearing Aid Directionality and Remote Microphone on Speech Intelligibility in Complex Listening Situations.
    Wagener KC; Vormann M; Latzel M; Mülder HE
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518804945. PubMed ID: 30322342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of a programmable 3-channel compression hearing system with single-channel AGC instruments.
    Kiessling J; Steffens T
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():67-74. PubMed ID: 8153566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.