138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37735628)
21. Survival Outcome of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on the Optimal Number of Examined Lymph Nodes: A Nomogram- and Machine-Learning-Based Approach.
Lai Y; Xie J; Yin X; Lai W; Tang J; Du Y; Li Z
J Clin Med; 2023 Feb; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 36769809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. What Is the Minimum Number of Examined Lymph Nodes After Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer?
Gao P; Song Y; Yang Y; Zhao S; Sun Y; Sun J; Chen X; Wang Z
J Gastrointest Surg; 2018 Jun; 22(6):1068-1076. PubMed ID: 29468556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Optimal examined lymph node count in node-negative colon cancer should be determined.
Feng H; Lyu Z; Liang W; Cai G; Deng Z; Jiang M; Wu D; Li Y
Future Oncol; 2021 Oct; 17(29):3865-3872. PubMed ID: 34287061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Optimal examined lymph node number for accurate staging and long-term survival in rectal cancer: a population-based study.
Guan X; Jiao S; Wen R; Yu G; Liu J; Miao D; Wei R; Zhang W; Hao L; Zhou L; Lou Z; Liu S; Zhao E; Wang G; Zhang W; Wang X
Int J Surg; 2023 Aug; 109(8):2241-2248. PubMed ID: 37428195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Prognostic value of a predictive model comprising preoperative inflammatory response and nutritional indexes in patients with gastric cancer].
Wu LL; Cai MZ; Wang BG; Deng JY; Ke B; Zhang RP; Liang H; Wang XN
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Jul; 26(7):680-688. PubMed ID: 37583026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Impact of examined lymph node number on lymph node status and prognosis in FIGO stage IB-IIA cervical squamous cell carcinoma: A population-based study.
Yong J; Ding B; Dong Y; Yang M
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():994105. PubMed ID: 36203444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Impact of examined lymph node count on prognosis in patients with lymph node-negative pancreatic body/tail ductal adenocarcinoma.
Li YF; Xiang YC; Zhang QQ; Wang WL
J Gastrointest Oncol; 2020 Aug; 11(4):644-653. PubMed ID: 32953148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The role of the cancer center when using lymph node count as a quality measure for gastric cancer surgery.
Morgan JW; Ji L; Friedman G; Senthil M; Dyke C; Lum SS
JAMA Surg; 2015 Jan; 150(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 25426671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Impact of the Extent of Lymph Node Dissection on Precise Staging and Survival in Clinical I-II Pure-Solid Lung Cancer Undergoing Lobectomy.
Chen D; Mao Y; Wen J; Shu J; Ye F; She Y; Ding Q; Shi L; Xue T; Fan M; Chen Y; Chen C
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2021 Apr; 19(4):393-402. PubMed ID: 33508774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Numbers and Stations: Impact of Examined Lymph Node on Precise Staging and Survival of Radiologically Pure-Solid NSCLC: A Multi-Institutional Study.
Chen D; Mao Y; Wen J; Shu J; Ye F; She Y; Ding Q; Shi L; Xue T; Fan M; Chen Y; Chen C
JTO Clin Res Rep; 2020 Sep; 1(3):100035. PubMed ID: 34589935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Greater Lymph Node Retrieval Improves Survival in Node-Negative Resected Gastric Cancer in the United States.
Mirkin KA; Hollenbeak CS; Wong J
J Gastric Cancer; 2017 Dec; 17(4):306-318. PubMed ID: 29302371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of Examined Lymph Node Count on Precise Staging and Long-Term Survival of Resected Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Population Study of the US SEER Database and a Chinese Multi-Institutional Registry.
Liang W; He J; Shen Y; Shen J; He Q; Zhang J; Jiang G; Wang Q; Liu L; Gao S; Liu D; Wang Z; Zhu Z; Ng CS; Liu CC; Petersen RH; Rocco G; D'Amico T; Brunelli A; Chen H; Zhi X; Liu B; Yang Y; Chen W; Zhou Q; He J
J Clin Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(11):1162-1170. PubMed ID: 28029318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Negative lymph node count as an independent prognostic factor in stage III patients after curative gastrectomy: A retrospective cohort study based on a multicenter database.
Zhang N; Deng J; Wang W; Sun Z; Wang Z; Xu H; Zhou Z; Liang H
Int J Surg; 2020 Feb; 74():44-52. PubMed ID: 31874262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The relationship between the number of examined lymph nodes and the efficacy of chemotherapy for gastric cancer.
Gu L; Chen B; Shen Z; Khadaroo PA; Wang X; Zhu H; Pan J; Zhong X; Mao F; Chen P
Surg Today; 2020 Jun; 50(6):585-596. PubMed ID: 31811459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Does a minimum number of 16 retrieved nodes affect survival in curatively resected gastric cancer?
Biondi A; D'Ugo D; Cananzi FC; Papa V; Borasi A; Sicoli F; Degiuli M; Doglietto G; Persiani R
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jun; 41(6):779-86. PubMed ID: 25899981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Lymphadenectomy and optimal excise lymph nodes count for early-stage primary fallopian tube cancer: a SEER-based study.
Liu Y; Huang F; Gu Q; Wang J; Wang Q; Wu Y; Li L; Xiao Y
BMC Womens Health; 2023 Dec; 23(1):681. PubMed ID: 38129825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Revolutionizing T3-4N0-2M0 gastric cancer staging with an innovative pN classification system.
Yin K; Jin X; Pan Y; Zi M; Zheng Y; Ma Y; Pang C; Liu K; Chen J; Wei Y; Liu D; Cheng X; Yuan L
J Gastrointest Surg; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38821213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Effect of standardized surgical treatment and multidisciplinary treatment strategy on the prognosis of gastric cancer patients: report of a single-center cohort study].
Zhang WH; Yang K; Chen XZ; Liu K; Chen XL; Zhao LY; Zhang B; Chen ZX; Chen JP; Zhou ZG; Hu JK
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):396-404. PubMed ID: 32306609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer after curative resection (R0) regardless of the examined number of lymph nodes.
Alatengbaolide ; Lin D; Li Y; Xu H; Chen J; Wang B; Liu C; Lu P
Am J Clin Oncol; 2013 Aug; 36(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 22547011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. How many ELNs are optimal for breast cancer patients with more than three PLNs who underwent MRM? A large population-based study.
Wang X; Ji C; Chi H; Wang H
Onco Targets Ther; 2018; 11():1005-1011. PubMed ID: 29520151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]