These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3773578)

  • 1. Centralization, certification, and monitoring. Readmissions and complications after surgery.
    Roos LL; Cageorge SM; Roos NP; Danzinger R
    Med Care; 1986 Nov; 24(11):1044-66. PubMed ID: 3773578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monitoring adverse outcomes of surgery using administrative data.
    Roos LL; Roos NP; Sharp SM
    Health Care Financ Rev; 1987 Dec; Spec No(Suppl):5-16. PubMed ID: 10312320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using computers to identify complications after surgery.
    Roos LL; Cageorge SM; Austen E; Lohr KN
    Am J Public Health; 1985 Nov; 75(11):1288-95. PubMed ID: 4051065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data.
    Amato L; Fusco D; Acampora A; Bontempi K; Rosa AC; Colais P; Cruciani F; D'Ovidio M; Mataloni F; Minozzi S; Mitrova Z; Pinnarelli L; Saulle R; Soldati S; Sorge C; Vecchi S; Ventura M; Davoli M
    Epidemiol Prev; 2017; 41(5-6 (Suppl 2)):1-128. PubMed ID: 29205995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of a surgical case review system.
    Edwards C
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1988 Nov; 14(11):332-5. PubMed ID: 3144688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Underlying reasons associated with hospital readmission following surgery in the United States.
    Merkow RP; Ju MH; Chung JW; Hall BL; Cohen ME; Williams MV; Tsai TC; Ko CY; Bilimoria KY
    JAMA; 2015 Feb; 313(5):483-95. PubMed ID: 25647204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].
    Amato L; Colais P; Davoli M; Ferroni E; Fusco D; Minozzi S; Moirano F; Sciattella P; Vecchi S; Ventura M; Perucci CA
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100. PubMed ID: 23851286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predischarge Predictors of Readmissions and Postdischarge Complications in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Xia L; Taylor BL; Pulido JE; Mucksavage P; Lee DI; Guzzo TJ
    J Endourol; 2017 Sep; 31(9):864-871. PubMed ID: 28853623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Experiences with surgical quality assurance in the district Cottbus].
    Horntrich J
    Zentralbl Chir; 1990; 115(12):781-3. PubMed ID: 2385976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medicare elective surgery outcomes and state prospective reimbursement programs.
    Gaumer GL; Poggio E; Sennett C
    Health Care Financ Rev; 1987 Dec; Spec No(Suppl):17-27. PubMed ID: 10317985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variations in surgical practice: welcome diversity of disturbing differences.
    Jennett B
    Br J Surg; 1988 Jul; 75(7):630-1. PubMed ID: 3046697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hysterectomies in one Canadian Province: a new look at risks and benefits.
    Roos NP
    Am J Public Health; 1984 Jan; 74(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 6689840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Care fragmentation in the postdischarge period: surgical readmissions, distance of travel, and postoperative mortality.
    Tsai TC; Orav EJ; Jha AK
    JAMA Surg; 2015 Jan; 150(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 25472595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of 30-day outcomes after emergency general surgery procedures: potential for targeted improvement.
    Ingraham AM; Cohen ME; Bilimoria KY; Raval MV; Ko CY; Nathens AB; Hall BL
    Surgery; 2010 Aug; 148(2):217-38. PubMed ID: 20633727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing existing technologies: the Manitoba study of common surgical procedures.
    Roos LL; Roos NP
    Med Care; 1983 Apr; 21(4):454-62. PubMed ID: 6843198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding Quality Issues in Your Surgical Department: Comparing the ACS NSQIP With Traditional Morbidity and Mortality Conferences in a Canadian Academic Hospital.
    Auspitz M; Cleghorn MC; Tse A; Sockalingam S; Quereshy FA; Okrainec A; Jackson TD
    J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(6):1272-7. PubMed ID: 26119095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Difficult to measure results and quality of surgical interventions but length of stay is an important variable].
    Nyström PO
    Lakartidningen; 2004 Jan; 101(3):184-9. PubMed ID: 14763087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Defining Rates and Risk Factors for Readmissions Following Emergency General Surgery.
    Havens JM; Olufajo OA; Cooper ZR; Haider AH; Shah AA; Salim A
    JAMA Surg; 2016 Apr; 151(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 26559368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing data quality: a computerized approach.
    Roos LL; Sharp SM; Wajda A
    Soc Sci Med; 1989; 28(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 2928827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing surgical risks in a population: patient histories before and after cholecystectomy.
    Roos NP; Danzinger R
    Soc Sci Med; 1986; 22(5):571-8. PubMed ID: 3486478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.