These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3773621)

  • 21. Survey of binaural hearing aid users.
    Brooks DN; Bulmer D
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(5):220-4. PubMed ID: 7297788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Patient experiences with multiband full dynamic range compression.
    Benson D; Clark TM; Johnson JS
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):320-30. PubMed ID: 1487092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Subjective measures of hearing aid benefit in the NIDCD/VA Clinical Trial.
    Haskell GB; Noffsinger D; Larson VD; Williams DW; Dobie RA; Rogers JL
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):301-7. PubMed ID: 12195172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The placebo effect and the influence of participant expectation on hearing aid trials.
    Dawes P; Powell S; Munro KJ
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):767-74. PubMed ID: 21730857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Development of APHAB norms for WDRC hearing aids and comparisons with original norms.
    Johnson JA; Cox RM; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 19692903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The hearing performance inventory and hearing aid use in profound hearing loss.
    Owens E; Fujikawa S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1980 Jun; 23(2):470-9. PubMed ID: 7442205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Hearing aid evaluation for persons with postlingual hearing levels of 90 to 100 dB.
    Fujikawa S; Owens E
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1979 Nov; 105(11):662-5. PubMed ID: 496715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
    Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Speech discrimination with an 8-channel compression hearing aid and conventional aids in background of speech-band noise.
    Yund EW; Simon HJ; Efron R
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):161-80. PubMed ID: 3430375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of high-fidelity hearing aids.
    Killion MC; Tillman TW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Mar; 25(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 7087418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Advantages of a new miniature hearing aid for mild to moderate hearing loss.
    Goode RL; Krusemark J
    Laryngoscope; 1999 Dec; 109(12):1919-23. PubMed ID: 10591347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Auditory Distraction and Acclimatization to Hearing Aids.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):174-183. PubMed ID: 27564230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of satisfaction measures of analog and digital hearing aid users.
    Magni C; Freiberger F; Tonn K
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2005; 71(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 16612528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life I: The Patients' Perspective.
    Cox RM; Johnson JA; Xu J
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):e224-37. PubMed ID: 26881981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Questionnaires on desirable properties of hearing aids.
    Hagerman B; Gabrielsson A
    Scand Audiol; 1985; 14(2):109-11. PubMed ID: 4023600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The active fitting (AF) programme of hearing aids: a psychological perspective.
    Eriksson-Mangold M; Ringdahl A; Björklund AK; Wåhlin B
    Br J Audiol; 1990 Aug; 24(4):277-85. PubMed ID: 2224293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reliability of patient choice between hearing aid systems.
    McClymont LG; Browning GG; Gatehouse S
    Br J Audiol; 1991 Feb; 25(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 2012902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Test of the assumptions underlying comparative hearing aid evaluations.
    Walden BE; Schwartz DM; Williams DL; Holum-Hardegen LL; Crowley JM
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1983 Aug; 48(3):264-73. PubMed ID: 6621017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sound quality evaluation of anti-saturation circuitry in a hearing aid.
    Agnew J
    Scand Audiol; 1997; 26(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 9080551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Satisfaction with fitted hearing aids. I. An analysis of technical information.
    Kapteyn TS
    Scand Audiol; 1977; 6(3):147-56. PubMed ID: 929092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.