622 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37736448)
1. Large Language Models in Hematology Case Solving: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT-3.5, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing.
Kumari A; Kumari A; Singh A; Singh SK; Juhi A; Dhanvijay AKD; Pinjar MJ; Mondal H
Cureus; 2023 Aug; 15(8):e43861. PubMed ID: 37736448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of Large Language Models (ChatGPT, Bing Search, and Google Bard) in Solving Case Vignettes in Physiology.
Dhanvijay AKD; Pinjar MJ; Dhokane N; Sorte SR; Kumari A; Mondal H
Cureus; 2023 Aug; 15(8):e42972. PubMed ID: 37671207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evidence-based potential of generative artificial intelligence large language models in orthodontics: a comparative study of ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing.
Makrygiannakis MA; Giannakopoulos K; Kaklamanos EG
Eur J Orthod; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38613510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the Performance of Generative AI Large Language Models ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing Chat in Supporting Evidence-Based Dentistry: Comparative Mixed Methods Study.
Giannakopoulos K; Kavadella A; Aaqel Salim A; Stamatopoulos V; Kaklamanos EG
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Dec; 25():e51580. PubMed ID: 38009003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benchmarking large language models' performances for myopia care: a comparative analysis of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4.0, and Google Bard.
Lim ZW; Pushpanathan K; Yew SME; Lai Y; Sun CH; Lam JSH; Chen DZ; Goh JHL; Tan MCJ; Sheng B; Cheng CY; Koh VTC; Tham YC
EBioMedicine; 2023 Sep; 95():104770. PubMed ID: 37625267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the Capability of ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing in Solving Radiology Case Vignettes.
Sarangi PK; Narayan RK; Mohakud S; Vats A; Sahani D; Mondal H
Indian J Radiol Imaging; 2024 Apr; 34(2):276-282. PubMed ID: 38549897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysing the Applicability of ChatGPT, Bard, and Bing to Generate Reasoning-Based Multiple-Choice Questions in Medical Physiology.
Agarwal M; Sharma P; Goswami A
Cureus; 2023 Jun; 15(6):e40977. PubMed ID: 37519497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing the Efficacy of Large Language Models ChatGPT, BARD, and Bing AI in Providing Information on Rhinoplasty: An Observational Study.
Seth I; Lim B; Xie Y; Cevik J; Rozen WM; Ross RJ; Lee M
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum; 2023; 5():ojad084. PubMed ID: 37795257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How AI Responds to Common Lung Cancer Questions: ChatGPT vs Google Bard.
Rahsepar AA; Tavakoli N; Kim GHJ; Hassani C; Abtin F; Bedayat A
Radiology; 2023 Jun; 307(5):e230922. PubMed ID: 37310252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of Large language model performance on the Multi-Specialty Recruitment Assessment (MSRA) exam.
Tsoutsanis P; Tsoutsanis A
Comput Biol Med; 2024 Jan; 168():107794. PubMed ID: 38043471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Harnessing artificial intelligence in bariatric surgery: comparative analysis of ChatGPT-4, Bing, and Bard in generating clinician-level bariatric surgery recommendations.
Lee Y; Shin T; Tessier L; Javidan A; Jung J; Hong D; Strong AT; McKechnie T; Malone S; Jin D; Kroh M; Dang JT; ;
Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38644078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of artificial intelligence in bariatric surgery: comparative analysis of ChatGPT-4, Bing, and Bard in the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery textbook of bariatric surgery questions.
Lee Y; Tessier L; Brar K; Malone S; Jin D; McKechnie T; Jung JJ; Kroh M; Dang JT;
Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38782611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the problem-solving performance of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, Bing Chat, and Bard for the Korean emergency medicine board examination question bank.
Lee GU; Hong DY; Kim SY; Kim JW; Lee YH; Park SO; Lee KR
Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Mar; 103(9):e37325. PubMed ID: 38428889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the Sensitivity, Specificity, and Accuracy of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, Bing AI, and Bard Against Conventional Drug-Drug Interactions Clinical Tools.
Al-Ashwal FY; Zawiah M; Gharaibeh L; Abu-Farha R; Bitar AN
Drug Healthc Patient Saf; 2023; 15():137-147. PubMed ID: 37750052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the Accuracy of Information on Medication Abortion: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Google Bard AI.
Mediboina A; Badam RK; Chodavarapu S
Cureus; 2024 Jan; 16(1):e51544. PubMed ID: 38318564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Emerging Role of AI in Patient Education: A Comparative Analysis of LLM Accuracy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Rahimli Ocakoglu S; Coskun B
Med Princ Pract; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38527444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Comparative Diagnostic Capability of Large Language Models in Otolaryngology.
Warrier A; Singh R; Haleem A; Zaki H; Eloy JA
Laryngoscope; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38563415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Google Bard on a Neurosurgery Oral Boards Preparation Question Bank.
Ali R; Tang OY; Connolly ID; Fridley JS; Shin JH; Zadnik Sullivan PL; Cielo D; Oyelese AA; Doberstein CE; Telfeian AE; Gokaslan ZL; Asaad WF
Neurosurgery; 2023 Nov; 93(5):1090-1098. PubMed ID: 37306460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy of AI Chats to Determine an Emergency: A Comparison Between OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing AI Chat.
Zúñiga Salazar G; Zúñiga D; Vindel CL; Yoong AM; Hincapie S; Zúñiga AB; Zúñiga P; Salazar E; Zúñiga B
Cureus; 2023 Sep; 15(9):e45473. PubMed ID: 37727841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating Large Language Models for the National Premedical Exam in India: Comparative Analysis of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Bard.
Farhat F; Chaudhry BM; Nadeem M; Sohail SS; Madsen DØ
JMIR Med Educ; 2024 Feb; 10():e51523. PubMed ID: 38381486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
