180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3773651)
1. An evaluation of clinicians' subjective prior probability estimates.
Dolan JG; Bordley DR; Mushlin AI
Med Decis Making; 1986; 6(4):216-23. PubMed ID: 3773651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pretest probability estimates: a pitfall to the clinical utility of evidence-based medicine?
Phelps MA; Levitt MA
Acad Emerg Med; 2004 Jun; 11(6):692-4. PubMed ID: 15175211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Overestimation of test effects in clinical judgment.
Lyman GH; Balducci L
J Cancer Educ; 1993; 8(4):297-307. PubMed ID: 8186081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bayes' rule in diagnosis.
Bours MJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Mar; 131():158-160. PubMed ID: 33741123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Generating pre-test probabilities: a neglected area in clinical decision making.
Attia JR; Nair BR; Sibbritt DW; Ewald BD; Paget NS; Wellard RF; Patterson L; Heller RF
Med J Aust; 2004 May; 180(9):449-54. PubMed ID: 15115422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Probabilistic reasoning and clinical decision-making: do doctors overestimate diagnostic probabilities?
Cahan A; Gilon D; Manor O; Paltiel O
QJM; 2003 Oct; 96(10):763-9. PubMed ID: 14500863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing aggregate estimates of derived thresholds for clinical decisions.
Young MJ; Eisenberg JM; Williams SV; Hershey JC
Health Serv Res; 1986 Feb; 20(6 Pt 1):763-80. PubMed ID: 3949540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Derived thresholds. Determining the diagnostic probabilities at which clinicians initiate testing and treatment.
Eisenberg JM; Hershey JC
Med Decis Making; 1983; 3(2):155-68. PubMed ID: 6415358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Issues in the application of Bayes' Theorem to child abuse decision making.
Proeve M
Child Maltreat; 2009 Feb; 14(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 18495947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bayes' theorem and diagnostic tests in neuropsychology: interval estimates for post-test probabilities.
Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Betkowska K
Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 May; 23(4):624-44. PubMed ID: 19235634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of the concept of subjective probability in undergraduate training in differential diagnosing.
Vrbová H; Benda J; Zvárová J
Acta Univ Carol Med (Praha); 1989; 35(3-4):187-90. PubMed ID: 2491730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of changing disease risk on clinical reasoning.
Lyman GH; Balducci L
J Gen Intern Med; 1994 Sep; 9(9):488-95. PubMed ID: 7996291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving the diagnosis of bipolar disorder: predictive value of screening tests.
Phelps JR; Ghaemi SN
J Affect Disord; 2006 Jun; 92(2-3):141-8. PubMed ID: 16529822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Uncertainty in Bayes.
Baron JA
Med Decis Making; 1994; 14(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 8152356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical inferences and decisions--II. Decision trees, receiver operator curves and subjective probability.
Aspinall P; Hill AR
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1984; 4(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 6709368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The accuracy of patients' judgments of disease probability and test sensitivity and specificity.
Hamm RM; Smith SL
J Fam Pract; 1998 Jul; 47(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 9673608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The value of Bayes' theorem for interpreting abnormal test scores in cognitively healthy and clinical samples.
Gavett BE
J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2015 Mar; 21(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 25784058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The measurement of subjective probability: evaluating the sensitivity and accuracy of various scales.
Haase N; Renkewitz F; Betsch C
Risk Anal; 2013 Oct; 33(10):1812-28. PubMed ID: 23465071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bayes' theorem and the physical examination: probability assessment and diagnostic decision making.
Herrle SR; Corbett EC; Fagan MJ; Moore CG; Elnicki DM
Acad Med; 2011 May; 86(5):618-27. PubMed ID: 21436660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measurement of expired carbon dioxide, oxygen and volume in conjunction with pretest probability estimation as a method to diagnose and exclude pulmonary venous thromboembolism.
Kline JA; Hogg M
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2006 Jul; 26(4):212-9. PubMed ID: 16836693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
