211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37736987)
1. Image Quality and Radiation Dose of Conventional and Wide-Field High-Resolution Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Cerebral Angiography: A Phantom Study.
Kawauchi S; Chida K; Hamada Y; Tsuruta W
Tomography; 2023 Sep; 9(5):1683-1693. PubMed ID: 37736987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cone-beam CT dose and imaging performance evaluation with a modular, multipurpose phantom.
Siewerdsen JH; Uneri A; Hernandez AM; Burkett GW; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):467-479. PubMed ID: 31808950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiation dose and image quality of X-ray volume imaging systems: cone-beam computed tomography, digital subtraction angiography and digital fluoroscopy.
Paul J; Jacobi V; Farhang M; Bazrafshan B; Vogl TJ; Mbalisike EC
Eur Radiol; 2013 Jun; 23(6):1582-93. PubMed ID: 23250112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mobile C-Arm with a CMOS detector: Technical assessment of fluoroscopy and Cone-Beam CT imaging performance.
Sheth NM; Zbijewski W; Jacobson MW; Abiola G; Kleinszig G; Vogt S; Soellradl S; Bialkowski J; Anderson WS; Weiss CR; Osgood GM; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5420-5436. PubMed ID: 30339271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biplane interventional pediatric system with cone-beam CT: dose and image quality characterization for the default protocols.
Corredoira E; Vañó E; Alejo L; Ubeda C; Gutiérrez-Larraya F; Garayoa J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):357-376. PubMed ID: 27455474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterizing a novel scintillating glass for application to megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography.
Hu YH; Shedlock D; Wang A; Rottmann J; Baturin P; Myronakis M; Huber P; Fueglistaller R; Shi M; Morf D; Star-Lack J; Berbeco RI
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1323-1330. PubMed ID: 30586163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigation into image quality and dose for different patient geometries with multiple cone-beam CT systems.
Gardner SJ; Studenski MT; Giaddui T; Cui Y; Galvin J; Yu Y; Xiao Y
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031908. PubMed ID: 24593726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dose and image quality of cone-beam computed tomography as compared with conventional multislice computed tomography in abdominal imaging.
Schegerer AA; Lechel U; Ritter M; Weisser G; Fink C; Brix G
Invest Radiol; 2014 Oct; 49(10):675-84. PubMed ID: 24853071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A mobile isocentric C-arm for intraoperative cone-beam CT: Technical assessment of dose and 3D imaging performance.
Sheth NM; De Silva T; Uneri A; Ketcha M; Han R; Vijayan R; Osgood GM; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):958-974. PubMed ID: 31863480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of cone-beam computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography in diagnostic imaging of the midface: A comparative study on Phantom and cadaver head scans.
Veldhoen S; Schöllchen M; Hanken H; Precht C; Henes FO; Schön G; Nagel HD; Schumacher U; Heiland M; Adam G; Regier M
Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):790-800. PubMed ID: 27169574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cone-beam breast computed tomography with a displaced flat panel detector array.
Mettivier G; Russo P; Lanconelli N; Meo SL
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2805-19. PubMed ID: 22559652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dual-energy imaging method to improve the image quality and the accuracy of dose calculation for cone-beam computed tomography.
Men K; Dai J; Chen X; Li M; Zhang K; Huang P
Phys Med; 2017 Apr; 36():110-118. PubMed ID: 28410679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mobile C-arm cone-beam CT for guidance of spine surgery: image quality, radiation dose, and integration with interventional guidance.
Schafer S; Nithiananthan S; Mirota DJ; Uneri A; Stayman JW; Zbijewski W; Schmidgunst C; Kleinszig G; Khanna AJ; Siewerdsena JH
Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4563-74. PubMed ID: 21928628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of three-dimensional iterative image reconstruction in C-arm-based interventional cone-beam CT: A phantom study in comparison with customary reconstruction technique.
Suzuki S; Katada Y; Takayanagi T; Sugawara H; Ishikawa T; Yamamoto Y; Wada H
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Mar; 98(13):e14947. PubMed ID: 30921193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Technical assessment of a cone-beam CT scanner for otolaryngology imaging: image quality, dose, and technique protocols.
Xu J; Reh DD; Carey JP; Mahesh M; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4932-42. PubMed ID: 22894419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of radiation dose and image quality between flat panel computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography in a hybrid CT-angiography suite.
Jones AK; Odisio BC
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):121-127. PubMed ID: 31922349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A quality assurance framework for the fully automated and objective evaluation of image quality in cone-beam computed tomography.
Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender WA
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031901. PubMed ID: 24593719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and validation of a hybrid simulation technique for cone beam CT: application to an oral imaging system.
Zhang G; Pauwels R; Marshall N; Shaheen E; Nuyts J; Jacobs R; Bosmans H
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Sep; 56(18):5823-43. PubMed ID: 21846936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High resolution dual detector volume-of-interest cone beam breast CT--Demonstration with a bench top system.
Shen Y; Yi Y; Zhong Y; Lai CJ; Liu X; You Z; Ge S; Wang T; Shaw CC
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6429-42. PubMed ID: 22149826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose and image quality evaluation of a dedicated cone-beam CT system for high-contrast neurologic applications.
Yu L; Vrieze TJ; Bruesewitz MR; Kofler JM; DeLone DR; Pallanch JF; Lindell EP; McCollough CH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):W193-201. PubMed ID: 20093573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
