BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3773706)

  • 1. Word and picture identification: is representational parsimony possible?
    Kirsner K; Milech D; Stumpfel V
    Mem Cognit; 1986 Sep; 14(5):398-408. PubMed ID: 3773706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Item and attribute storage of pictures and words in memory.
    Park DC
    Am J Psychol; 1980 Dec; 93(4):603-15. PubMed ID: 7212130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Altering retrieval demands reverses the picture superiority effect.
    Weldon MS; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 1987 Jul; 15(4):269-80. PubMed ID: 3670049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition.
    Simpson GB
    Psychol Bull; 1984 Sep; 96(2):316-40. PubMed ID: 6385046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The plausibility effect: lexical priming or sentential processing?
    Ratcliff JE
    Mem Cognit; 1987 Nov; 15(6):482-96. PubMed ID: 3695942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enduring influence of the purpose of experiences: encoding-retrieval interactions in word and pseudoword perception.
    Whittlesea BW; Cantwell AL
    Mem Cognit; 1987 Nov; 15(6):465-72. PubMed ID: 3695940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The properties of retrieval cues constrain the picture superiority effect.
    Weldon MS; Roediger HL; Challis BH
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jan; 17(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 2913461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Encoding specificity in the recall of pictures and words in children and adults.
    Ackerman BP
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1981 Apr; 31(2):193-211. PubMed ID: 7217888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of phonetic and orthographic similarity in picture-word interference.
    Lupker SJ
    Can J Psychol; 1982 Sep; 36(3):349-67. PubMed ID: 7172126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dissociated imageability, concreteness, and familiarity in lateralized word recognition.
    Boles DB
    Mem Cognit; 1983 Sep; 11(5):511-9. PubMed ID: 6656610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Encoding and contextual components of word recognition in good and poor readers.
    Simpson GB; Lorsbach TC; Whitehouse D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1983 Feb; 35(1):161-71. PubMed ID: 6827215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: effects of word frequency.
    Inhoff AW; Rayner K
    Percept Psychophys; 1986 Dec; 40(6):431-9. PubMed ID: 3808910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adult age differences in visual word recognition: semantic encoding and episodic retention.
    Madden DJ
    Exp Aging Res; 1986; 12(2):71-8. PubMed ID: 3569387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence for processing of constituent single- and multiletter codes: support for multilevel coding in word perception.
    Greenberg SN; Vellutino FR
    Mem Cognit; 1988 Jan; 16(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 3339999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Picture-word interference in learning disabled and normal children.
    Lovdahl KE; Brown AS; McIntyre CW; North AJ
    J Learn Disabil; 1986 May; 19(5):294-301. PubMed ID: 3711734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intrusion and location errors in the naming of letters in words and non-words.
    Solman RT
    Psychol Res; 1988; 50(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 3186875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mental representations for pictures and words: same or different?
    Nelson DL; CastaƱo D
    Am J Psychol; 1984; 97(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 6721004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of varying modality, surface features, and retention interval on priming in word-fragment completion.
    Roediger HL; Blaxton TA
    Mem Cognit; 1987 Sep; 15(5):379-88. PubMed ID: 3670057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of different types of retrieval cues on the recall of names of famous faces.
    Hanley JR; Cowell ES
    Mem Cognit; 1988 Nov; 16(6):545-55. PubMed ID: 3193886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Specific word transfer as a measure of processing in the word-superiority paradigm.
    Hayman CA; Jacoby LL
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Mar; 17(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 2927310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.