These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37739042)

  • 1. Different prioritization states of working memory representations affect visual searches: Evidence from an event-related potential study.
    Wang M; Liu H; Chen Y; Yang P; Fu S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2023 Nov; 193():112246. PubMed ID: 37739042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Suppression on the basis of template for rejection is reactive: Evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Pang C; Chen Y; Zhang Y; Nan W; Fu S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1148-1162. PubMed ID: 38491317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance.
    van Moorselaar D; Battistoni E; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():1-10. PubMed ID: 25428708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distinct prioritization of visual working memory representations for search and for recall.
    Dube B; Al-Aidroos N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1253-1261. PubMed ID: 30644056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The success of the representation maintenance affects the memory-guided search processing: an ERP study.
    Wang M; Yang P; Jin Z; Zhang J; Li L
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Feb; 237(2):503-509. PubMed ID: 30465144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory.
    Dube B; Lumsden A; Al-Aidroos N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):641-646. PubMed ID: 30276638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Benefits of flexible prioritization in working memory can arise without costs.
    Myers NE; Chekroud SR; Stokes MG; Nobre AC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Mar; 44(3):398-411. PubMed ID: 28816476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Memory guidance in distractor suppression is governed by the availability of cognitive control.
    Wen W; Hou Y; Li S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jul; 80(5):1157-1168. PubMed ID: 29582389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Reactivation of working memory representations affects attentional guidance.
    Che X; Lian H; Zhang F; Li S; Zheng Y
    Psychophysiology; 2024 Mar; 61(3):e14514. PubMed ID: 38183326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Neural Consequences of Attentional Prioritization of Internal Representations in Visual Working Memory.
    Sahan MI; Sheldon AD; Postle BR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 May; 32(5):917-944. PubMed ID: 31851592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retro-cue benefits in working memory without sustained focal attention.
    Rerko L; Souza AS; Oberauer K
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Jul; 42(5):712-28. PubMed ID: 24442551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selection within working memory based on a color retro-cue modulates alpha oscillations.
    Poch C; Capilla A; Hinojosa JA; Campo P
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Nov; 106():133-137. PubMed ID: 28958909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Learned and cued distractor rejection for multiple features in visual search.
    Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Feb; 81(2):359-376. PubMed ID: 30421366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Manipulating the focus of attention in working memory: Evidence for a protection of multiple items against perceptual interference.
    Barth A; Schneider D
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13062. PubMed ID: 29315628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrophysiological evidence for enhanced representation of food stimuli in working memory.
    Rutters F; Kumar S; Higgs S; Humphreys GW
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 233(2):519-28. PubMed ID: 25354971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inhibition continues to guide search under concurrent visual working memory load.
    Hamblin-Frohman Z; Becker SI
    J Vis; 2022 Feb; 22(2):8. PubMed ID: 35156992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Value-driven attentional capture is modulated by the contents of working memory: An EEG study.
    Hinault T; Blacker KJ; Gormley M; Anderson BA; Courtney SM
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Apr; 19(2):253-267. PubMed ID: 30460482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Control of Single-color and Multiple-color Visual Search by Attentional Templates in Working Memory and in Long-term Memory.
    Grubert A; Carlisle NB; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 28(12):1947-1963. PubMed ID: 27458746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive-behavioral and electrophysiological evidence of the affective consequences of ignoring stimulus representations in working memory.
    De Vito D; Ferrey AE; Fenske MJ; Al-Aidroos N
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 18(3):460-475. PubMed ID: 29546688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.