124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37739222)
21. Does fixation method affects temporomandibular joints after mandibular advancement?
Ureturk EU; Apaydin A
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 46(6):923-931. PubMed ID: 29724535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Changes of Temporomandibular Joint Morphology and Symptoms in Class II Malocclusion Patients With Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramous Osteotomy.
Luo YX; Chen ZH; Wang JN
J Craniofac Surg; 2023 Oct; 34(7):e655-e660. PubMed ID: 37801718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessment of temporomandibular joint disc position and skeletal stability after bimaxillary surgery.
Ueki K; Moroi A; Takayama A; Yoshizawa K
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Mar; 28(1):137-148. PubMed ID: 37280442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Transitional joint effusion in the mandibular prognathic surgery patient: intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy versus sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Nishimura M; Segami N; Sato J; Honjou M; Fujimura K
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 May; 62(5):545-8. PubMed ID: 15122556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. MRI changes in the temporomandibular joint following mandibular setback surgery using sagittal split ramus osteotomy with rigid fixation.
Takahara N; Kabasawa Y; Sato M; Tetsumura A; Kurabayashi T; Omura K
Cranio; 2017 Jan; 35(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 27077250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biomechanical analysis of titanium fixation plates and screws in sagittal split ramus osteotomies.
Atik F; Atac MS; Özkan A; Kılınc Y; Arslan M
Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 26755233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Treatment of Dentofacial Deformity Associated with Temporomandibular Joint Ankylosis Through Vertical and Sagittal Osteotomies of the Mandibular Ramus.
Filho AML; Junior GMFG; Santos ES; JUnior MJB; Neto JVP; Santos JMO
J Craniofac Surg; 2022 May; 33(3):e305-e308. PubMed ID: 34732668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Biomechanical study on the changes of stress in temporomandibular joints after the orthognathic surgery in patients with mandibular prognathism: a 3D finite element study.
Shu J; Wang Q; Ma H; Teng H; Zheng T; Liu Z
Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2020; 22(2):155-163. PubMed ID: 32868940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Bilateral Sagittal Split Mandibular Ramus Osteotomy Alters the Temporomandibular Joint.
Wang X; Sun X; Wu G
J Craniofac Surg; 2021 Sep; 32(6):e598-e600. PubMed ID: 34387266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of sagittal split ramus osteotomy on morphologic parameters of temporomandibular joint in patients with mandibular prognathism.
Ma HD; Shu JH; Deng XZ; Liu Z
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 May; 98(22):e15830. PubMed ID: 31145325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Mechanical characteristics of the mandible after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: comparing 2 different fixation techniques.
Chuong CJ; Borotikar B; Schwartz-Dabney C; Sinn DP
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jan; 63(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 15635560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Biomechanical Evaluation of Seven Fixation Methods for Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy with Four Advancement Levels by Finite Element Analysis.
He Y; Zhang H; Qiao J; Fu X; Xu S; Jin Q; Liu J; Chen Y; Yu B; Niu F
Front Surg; 2022; 9():891747. PubMed ID: 35599806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Establishment and primary analysis of the three-dimensional finite element model of mandibular bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with rigid internal fixation].
Xu CT; Sun GL; Zhou J; Wang PL
Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 May; 23(3):215-7. PubMed ID: 17649942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of different fixation methods following sagittal split ramus osteotomies using three-dimensional finite elements analysis. Part 1: advancement surgery-posterior loading.
Erkmen E; Simşek B; Yücel E; Kurt A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 34(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 16053877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Occurrence of a 'bad' split and success of initial mandibular healing: a review of 524 sagittal ramus osteotomies in 262 patients.
Posnick JC; Choi E; Liu S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 45(10):1187-94. PubMed ID: 27237078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Changes in temporomandibular joint and ramus after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular prognathism patients with and without asymmetry.
Ueki K; Moroi A; Sotobori M; Ishihara Y; Marukawa K; Yoshizawa K; Kato K; Kawashiri S
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):821-7. PubMed ID: 22507292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Postoperative stability of bimaxillary surgery in Class III patients with mandibular protrusion and mandibular deviation: a frontal cephalometric study.
Al-Gunaid T; Yamada K; Takagi R; Saito C; Saito I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 37(11):992-8. PubMed ID: 18621507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessment of lateral pterygoid muscle and temporomandibular joint disc after Le Fort I osteotomy with and without intentional pterygoid plate fracture and sagittal split ramus osteotomy in class II and class III patients.
Ueki K; Yoshizawa K; Takayama A; Baba N; Kimura Y; Koizumi M; Fujimoto K; Iguchi R; Ono S; Osada AH; Moroi A
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2022 Jan; 50(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 34598864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Does the Posterior Bending Osteotomy in Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy Affect the Condyle Position in Asymmetric Patients?
Pergel T; Bilge S; Demirbaş AE; Kütük N
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Jul; 81(7):855-868. PubMed ID: 37086750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Three-dimensional computed tomographic evaluation of bilateral sagittal split osteotomy lingual fracture line and le fort I pterygomaxillary separation in orthognathic surgery using cadaver heads: ultrasonic osteotome versus conventional saw.
Dammous S; Dupont Q; Gilles R
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 73(6):1169-80. PubMed ID: 25795191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
