These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37739260)

  • 1. Expectations modulate retrieval interference during ellipsis resolution.
    Tung TY; Brennan JR
    Neuropsychologia; 2023 Nov; 190():108680. PubMed ID: 37739260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Event-related brain potentials index cue-based retrieval interference during sentence comprehension.
    Martin AE; Nieuwland MS; Carreiras M
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(2):1859-69. PubMed ID: 21925613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dissociating retrieval interference and reanalysis in the P600 during sentence comprehension.
    Tanner D; Grey S; van Hell JG
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Feb; 54(2):248-259. PubMed ID: 27859315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cue integration during sentence comprehension: Electrophysiological evidence from ellipsis.
    Martin AE
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206616. PubMed ID: 30496297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Agreement attraction during comprehension of grammatical sentences: ERP evidence from ellipsis.
    Martin AE; Nieuwland MS; Carreiras M
    Brain Lang; 2014 Aug; 135():42-51. PubMed ID: 24911918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cues, quantification, and agreement in language comprehension.
    Tanner D; Bulkes NZ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1753-63. PubMed ID: 25987192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural mechanisms of sentence comprehension based on predictive processes and decision certainty: Electrophysiological evidence from non-canonical linearizations in a flexible word order language.
    Dröge A; Fleischer J; Schlesewsky M; Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I
    Brain Res; 2016 Feb; 1633():149-166. PubMed ID: 26740402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Principled Approach to Feature Selection in Models of Sentence Processing.
    Smith G; Vasishth S
    Cogn Sci; 2020 Dec; 44(12):e12918. PubMed ID: 33306205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Memory operations that support language comprehension: evidence from verb-phrase ellipsis.
    Martin AE; McElree B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1231-9. PubMed ID: 19686017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Encoding interference effects support self-organized sentence processing.
    Smith G; Franck J; Tabor W
    Cogn Psychol; 2021 Feb; 124():101356. PubMed ID: 33285355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct-access retrieval during sentence comprehension: Evidence from Sluicing.
    Martin AE; McElree B
    J Mem Lang; 2011 May; 64(4):327-343. PubMed ID: 21580797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Graded expectations: Predictive processing and the adjustment of expectations during spoken language comprehension.
    Boudewyn MA; Long DL; Swaab TY
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 15(3):607-24. PubMed ID: 25673006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retrieval (N400) and integration (P600) in expectation-based comprehension.
    Aurnhammer C; Delogu F; Schulz M; Brouwer H; Crocker MW
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0257430. PubMed ID: 34582472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Semantic Predictability Facilitates Comprehension of Degraded Speech in a Graded Manner.
    Bhandari P; Demberg V; Kray J
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():714485. PubMed ID: 34566795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sentence integration processes: an ERP study of Chinese sentence comprehension with relative clauses.
    Yang CL; Perfetti CA; Liu Y
    Brain Lang; 2010 Feb; 112(2):85-100. PubMed ID: 20006378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When a look is enough: Neurophysiological correlates of referential speaker gaze in situated comprehension.
    Jachmann TK; Drenhaus H; Staudte M; Crocker MW
    Cognition; 2023 Jul; 236():105449. PubMed ID: 37030139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictability and decomposability separately contribute to compositional processing of idiomatic language.
    Hubbard R; Bulkes N; Lai VT
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Aug; 60(8):e14269. PubMed ID: 36762757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of contrastive focus on lexical predictability during sentence reading: The case of
    Lowder MW; Ryan G; Opie J; Kaminsky E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Jan; 74(1):179-186. PubMed ID: 32705949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Neurocomputational Model of the N400 and the P600 in Language Processing.
    Brouwer H; Crocker MW; Venhuizen NJ; Hoeks JCJ
    Cogn Sci; 2017 May; 41 Suppl 6(Suppl Suppl 6):1318-1352. PubMed ID: 28000963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The time-course of feature interference in agreement comprehension: Multiple mechanisms and asymmetrical attraction.
    Tanner D; Nicol J; Brehm L
    J Mem Lang; 2014 Oct; 76():195-215. PubMed ID: 25258471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.