128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37739916)
1. The Highest Grade Group Does Not Drive the Risk of Recurrence when Systematic and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-targeted Biopsies are Discordant: Preliminary Findings Using Radical Prostatectomy Pathology as a Surrogate for MRI-targeted Biopsy Grade.
Scuderi S; Pellegrino F; Tin A; Beech BB; Gandaglia G; Stabile A; Eastham JA; Montorsi F; Briganti A; Vickers AJ
Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 37739916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve men: direct comparison of systematic biopsy, multiparametric MRI- and contrast-ultrasound-dispersion imaging-targeted biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Engelbrecht MRW; Postema AW; van Kollenburg RAA; Hoeks CMA; Savci-Heijink CD; Van Sloun RJG; Wildeboer RR; De Reijke TM; Mischi M; Wijkstra H
BJU Int; 2020 Oct; 126(4):481-493. PubMed ID: 32315112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Versus Systematic Prostate Biopsies: 2-year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial (PRECISE).
Klotz L; Chin J; Black PC; Finelli A; Anidjar M; Machado A; Levental M; Ghai S; Chang SD; Patel C; Kassam Z; Loblaw A; Kebabdjian M; Pond G; Haider MA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2024 Jun; 7(3):456-461. PubMed ID: 37838556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gleason Grade Group Concordance between Systematic Template Combining Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Targeted Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: A Comparison of Transperineal and Transrectal Approaches.
Wu S; Feldman AS; Kim MM; Lin SX; Cornejo KM; Harisinghani MG; Dahl DM; Wu CL
Urology; 2023 May; 175():151-156. PubMed ID: 36828261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Targeted Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Quantitative Gleason 4 Grading Prediction in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: Implications for Active Surveillance Candidate Selection.
Kachanov M; Budäus L; Beyersdorff D; Karakiewicz PI; Tian Z; Falkenbach F; Tilki D; Maurer T; Sauter G; Graefen M; Leyh-Bannurah SR
Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Mar; 9(2):303-308. PubMed ID: 36184537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the optimal strategy in men with a single unilateral suspicious lesion on MRI undergoing transperineal MRI/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy.
Yusim I; Mazor E; Frumkin E; Jabareen M; Hefer B; Elsaraya N; Li S; Rouvinov K; Novack V; Mabjeesh NJ
Prostate; 2023 Sep; 83(13):1255-1262. PubMed ID: 37263774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of TRUS and combined MRI-targeted plus systematic prostate biopsy for the concordance between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology.
Aslan G; Çelik S; Sözen S; Akdoğan B; İzol V; Yücel Bilen C; Sahin B; Türkeri L;
Int J Clin Pract; 2021 Mar; 75(3):e13797. PubMed ID: 33113261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Concordance Between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Pathology in the Era of Targeted Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Goel S; Shoag JE; Gross MD; Al Hussein Al Awamlh B; Robinson B; Khani F; Baltich Nelson B; Margolis DJ; Hu JC
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Feb; 3(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 31492650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the Clinical Value of Positive Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Young Men with a Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.
Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; Soligo M; De Cobelli F; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Esposito A; Brembilla G; Karnes RJ; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):594-600. PubMed ID: 31204312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by transperineal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsy in smaller prostates.
Dahl DM; Kim MM; Wu S; Lin SX; Crotty RK; Cornejo KM; Harisinghani MG; Feldman AS; Wu CL
Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 40(10):451.e9-451.e14. PubMed ID: 36008257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prostate cancer detection rate in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation and targeted prostate biopsy.
Kaufmann B; Saba K; Schmidli TS; Stutz S; Bissig L; Britschgi AJ; Schaeren E; Gu A; Langenegger N; Sulser T; Eberli D; Keller EX; Hermanns T; Poyet C
Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 34914121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Suitability of conventional systematic vs. MRI-guided targeted biopsy approaches to assess surgical treatment delay for radical prostatectomy.
Kachanov M; Budäus L; Witt JH; Wagner C; Zinke J; Fangmeyer B; Schütte A; Spieker T; Beyersdorff D; Graefen M; Rachubinski P; Leyh-Bannurah SR
World J Urol; 2022 Dec; 40(12):2955-2961. PubMed ID: 36357604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prostate cancer upgrading with serial prostate magnetic resonance imaging and repeat biopsy in men on active surveillance: are confirmatory biopsies still necessary?
Osses DF; Drost FH; Verbeek JFM; Luiting HB; van Leenders GJLH; Bangma CH; Krestin GP; Roobol MJ; Schoots IG
BJU Int; 2020 Jul; 126(1):124-132. PubMed ID: 32232921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic Performance of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging-directed Targeted plus Regional Biopsy Approach in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Hagens MJ; Fernandez Salamanca M; Padhani AR; van Leeuwen PJ; van der Poel HG; Schoots IG
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2022 Jun; 40():95-103. PubMed ID: 35540708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The added value of systematic biopsy in men with suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing multiparametric MRI-targeted biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Kajtazovic A; Lodeizen OAP; Gayet M; Engelbrecht MRW; Jager GJ; Wijkstra H; de Reijke TM; Beerlage HP
Urol Oncol; 2019 May; 37(5):298.e1-298.e9. PubMed ID: 30660493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimizing Combined Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Targeted and Systematic Biopsy Strategies: Sparing the Multiparametric MRI-Negative Transitional Zone in Presence of Exclusively Peripheral Multiparametric MRI-Suspect Lesions.
Kachanov M; Leyh-Bannurah SR; Roberts MJ; Sauer M; Beyersdorff D; Boiko S; Maurer T; Steuber T; Graefen M; Budäus L
J Urol; 2022 Feb; 207(2):333-340. PubMed ID: 34555925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimal sampling scheme in men with abnormal multiparametric MRI undergoing MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy.
Freifeld Y; Xi Y; Passoni N; Woldu S; Hornberger B; Goldberg K; Bagrodia A; Raj G; Margulis V; Cadeddu JA; Lotan Y; Francis F; Pedrosa I; G Roehrborn C; Costa DN
Urol Oncol; 2019 Jan; 37(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 30446460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The oncologic risk of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic cores in patients treated with radical prostatectomy.
Gaffney CD; Tin AL; Fainberg J; Fine S; Jibara G; Touijer K; Eastham J; Scardino P; Laudone V; Vickers AJ; Ehdaie B
Cancer; 2023 Dec; 129(23):3790-3796. PubMed ID: 37584213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Scores to Select an Optimal Prostate Biopsy Method: A Secondary Analysis of the Trio Study.
Ahdoot M; Lebastchi AH; Long L; Wilbur AR; Gomella PT; Mehralivand S; Daneshvar MA; Yerram NK; O'Connor LP; Wang AZ; Gurram S; Bloom J; Siddiqui MM; Linehan WM; Merino M; Choyke PL; Pinsky P; Parnes H; Shih JH; Turkbey B; Wood BJ; Pinto PA;
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Apr; 5(2):176-186. PubMed ID: 33846112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
