These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37741202)

  • 21. Collision-avoidance lane change control method for enhancing safety for connected vehicle platoon in mixed traffic environment.
    Ma Y; Liu Q; Fu J; Liufu K; Li Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 May; 184():106999. PubMed ID: 36780868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Towards human-like speed control in autonomous vehicles: A mountainous freeway case.
    Chen Z; Wang X; Guo Q; Tarko A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Mar; 166():106566. PubMed ID: 35026555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Exploring the mechanism of crashes with automated vehicles using statistical modeling approaches.
    Wang S; Li Z
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0214550. PubMed ID: 30921396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accelerated Evaluation of Automated Vehicles Safety in Lane-Change Scenarios Based on Importance Sampling Techniques.
    Zhao D; Lam H; Peng H; Bao S; LeBlanc DJ; Nobukawa K; Pan CS
    IEEE trans Intell Transp Syst; 2017 Mar; 18(3):595-607. PubMed ID: 27840592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparative study of collision types between automated and conventional vehicles using Bayesian probabilistic inferences.
    Novat N; Kidando E; Kutela B; Kitali AE
    J Safety Res; 2023 Feb; 84():251-260. PubMed ID: 36868654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What humanlike errors do autonomous vehicles need to avoid to maximize safety?
    Mueller AS; Cicchino JB; Zuby DS
    J Safety Res; 2020 Dec; 75():310-318. PubMed ID: 33334489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Vehicle Safety-Assisted Driving Technology Based on Computer Artificial Intelligence Environment.
    Yan H
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():4390394. PubMed ID: 35761870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analysis of effects of driver's evasive action time on rear-end collision risk using a driving simulator.
    Shah D; Lee C
    J Safety Res; 2021 Sep; 78():242-250. PubMed ID: 34399920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. What can we learn from autonomous vehicle collision data on crash severity? A cost-sensitive CART approach.
    Zhu S; Meng Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106769. PubMed ID: 35858521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Human-like car-following model for autonomous vehicles considering the cut-in behavior of other vehicles in mixed traffic.
    Fu R; Li Z; Sun Q; Wang C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Nov; 132():105260. PubMed ID: 31442924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Emergency collision avoidance strategy for autonomous vehicles based on steering and differential braking.
    Li H; Zheng T; Xia F; Gao L; Ye Q; Guo Z
    Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):22647. PubMed ID: 36587056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quantifying the Impact of Deployments of Autonomous Vehicles and Intelligent Roads on Road Safety in China: A Country-Level Modeling Study.
    Tan H; Zhao F; Song H; Liu Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Feb; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 36901079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The safety potential of enhanced lateral vehicle positioning.
    Sternlund S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(2):139-146. PubMed ID: 33556264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Collision-free emergency planning and control methods for CAVs considering intentions of surrounding vehicles.
    Zhao S; Zhang J; He C; Huang M; Ji Y; Liu W
    ISA Trans; 2023 May; 136():535-547. PubMed ID: 36371261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prediction of rear-end conflict frequency using multiple-location traffic parameters.
    Katrakazas C; Theofilatos A; Islam MA; Papadimitriou E; Dimitriou L; Antoniou C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 152():106007. PubMed ID: 33556654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In-depth analysis of drivers' merging behavior and rear-end crash risks in work zone merging areas.
    Weng J; Xue S; Yang Y; Yan X; Qu X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Apr; 77():51-61. PubMed ID: 25687332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Human-Like Lane Change Decision Model for Autonomous Vehicles that Considers the Risk Perception of Drivers in Mixed Traffic.
    Wang C; Sun Q; Li Z; Zhang H
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Apr; 20(8):. PubMed ID: 32316210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Autonomous emergency braking systems adapted to snowy road conditions improve drivers' perceived safety and trust.
    Koglbauer I; Holzinger J; Eichberger A; Lex C
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Apr; 19(3):332-337. PubMed ID: 29227692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. High-risk powered two-wheelers scenarios generation for autonomous vehicle testing using WGAN.
    Luo X; Wei Z; Zhang G; Huang H; Zhou R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2024 Oct; ():1-9. PubMed ID: 39405428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Characterizing car-following behaviors of human drivers when following automated vehicles using the real-world dataset.
    Wen X; Cui Z; Jian S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jul; 172():106689. PubMed ID: 35569279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.