These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37741902)

  • 1. An Enhanced Spine Model Validated for Simulating Dynamic Lifting Tasks in OpenSim.
    Akhavanfar M; Mir-Orefice A; Uchida TK; Graham RB
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2024 Feb; 52(2):259-269. PubMed ID: 37741902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of lumbar spinal loading and trunk muscle forces during asymmetric lifting tasks: application of whole-body musculoskeletal modelling in OpenSim.
    Kim HK; Zhang Y
    Ergonomics; 2017 Apr; 60(4):563-576. PubMed ID: 27194401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of an OpenSim full-body model with detailed lumbar spine for estimating lower lumbar spine loads during symmetric and asymmetric lifting tasks.
    Beaucage-Gauvreau E; Robertson WSP; Brandon SCE; Fraser R; Freeman BJC; Graham RB; Thewlis D; Jones CF
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2019 Apr; 22(5):451-464. PubMed ID: 30714401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An OpenSim thoracolumbar spine model applying a bottom-up modelling approach is similar to a top-down approach.
    Banks JJ; Wiggermann NE; Allaire BT; Anderson DE
    J Biomech; 2024 Jul; 172():112230. PubMed ID: 39024736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads.
    Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A; Arjmand N
    Eur Spine J; 2007 May; 16(5):687-99. PubMed ID: 17103232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hybrid musculoskeletal model-based 3D asymmetric lifting prediction and comparison with symmetric lifting.
    Xiang Y; Zaman R; Arefeen A; Quarnstrom J; Rakshit R; Yang J
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2023 Jun; 237(6):770-781. PubMed ID: 37139889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of Lumbar Spine Loading of Low Back Pain Participant During Lifting Using an Open Source Musculoskeletal Model.
    Manoharan P; Pranata A; Tse KM; Chai R
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2023 Jul; 2023():1-4. PubMed ID: 38083103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of different lifting analysis tools in estimating lower spinal loads - Evaluation of NIOSH criterion.
    Ghezelbash F; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A; Arjmand N
    J Biomech; 2020 Nov; 112():110024. PubMed ID: 32961423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intervertebral reaction force prediction using an enhanced assembly of OpenSim models.
    Senteler M; Weisse B; Rothenfluh DA; Snedeker JG
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2016; 19(5):538-48. PubMed ID: 26031341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An artificial neural network for full-body posture prediction in dynamic lifting activities and effects of its prediction errors on model-estimated spinal loads.
    Hosseini N; Arjmand N
    J Biomech; 2024 Jan; 162():111896. PubMed ID: 38072705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanics of changes in lumbar posture in static lifting.
    Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Dec; 30(23):2637-48. PubMed ID: 16319750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of neglecting passive spinal structures: a quantitative investigation using the forward-dynamics and inverse-dynamics musculoskeletal approach.
    Meszaros-Beller L; Hammer M; Schmitt S; Pivonka P
    Front Physiol; 2023; 14():1135531. PubMed ID: 37324394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparisons of lumbar spine loads and kinematics in healthy and non-specific low back pain individuals during unstable lifting activities.
    Heidari E; Arjmand N; Kahrizi S
    J Biomech; 2022 Nov; 144():111344. PubMed ID: 36270086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative ability of EMG, optimization, and hybrid modelling approaches to predict trunk muscle forces and lumbar spine loading during dynamic sagittal plane lifting.
    Gagnon D; Larivière C; Loisel P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2001 Jun; 16(5):359-72. PubMed ID: 11390042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relative performances of artificial neural network and regression mapping tools in evaluation of spinal loads and muscle forces during static lifting.
    Arjmand N; Ekrami O; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A; Parnianpour M
    J Biomech; 2013 May; 46(8):1454-62. PubMed ID: 23541615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical Assessment of the NIOSH Lifting Equation in Asymmetric Load-Handling Activities Using a Detailed Musculoskeletal Model.
    Behjati M; Arjmand N
    Hum Factors; 2019 Mar; 61(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 30222936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of a Patient-Specific Musculoskeletal Model for Lumbar Load Estimation Generated by an Automated Pipeline From Whole Body CT.
    Lerchl T; El Husseini M; Bayat A; Sekuboyina A; Hermann L; Nispel K; Baum T; Löffler MT; Senner V; Kirschke JS
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2022; 10():862804. PubMed ID: 35898642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of spinal force normalization techniques.
    Akhavanfar M; Uchida TK; Graham RB
    J Biomech; 2023 Jan; 147():111441. PubMed ID: 36680886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Thoracolumbar spine model with articulated ribcage for the prediction of dynamic spinal loading.
    Ignasiak D; Dendorfer S; Ferguson SJ
    J Biomech; 2016 Apr; 49(6):959-966. PubMed ID: 26684431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robust estimation of lumbar joint forces in symmetric and asymmetric lifting tasks via large-scale electromyography-driven musculoskeletal models.
    Moya-Esteban A; van der Kooij H; Sartori M
    J Biomech; 2022 Nov; 144():111307. PubMed ID: 36191432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.