These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37742552)

  • 1. Establishment of a new cell-based assay to quantitatively evaluate the sweetness of sugar and sugar alcohol.
    Qin Y; Zhou Y; Yan X; Qin Z; Mao Y; Tian S
    Food Chem; 2024 Feb; 434():137436. PubMed ID: 37742552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensory characteristics and relative sweetness of tagatose and other sweeteners.
    Fujimaru T; Park JH; Lim J
    J Food Sci; 2012 Sep; 77(9):S323-8. PubMed ID: 22908895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Comparison of Psychophysical Dose-Response Behaviour across 16 Sweeteners.
    Wee M; Tan V; Forde C
    Nutrients; 2018 Nov; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 30400167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlation between in vitro binding activity of sweeteners to cloned human sweet taste receptor and sensory evaluation.
    Choi Y; Manthey JA; Park TH; Cha YK; Kim Y; Kim Y
    Food Sci Biotechnol; 2021 May; 30(5):675-682. PubMed ID: 34123464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationships between the response of the sweet taste receptor, salivation toward sweeteners, and sweetness intensity.
    Kusakabe Y; Shindo Y; Kawai T; Maeda-Yamamoto M; Wada Y
    Food Sci Nutr; 2021 Feb; 9(2):719-727. PubMed ID: 33598157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preference Drivers for Blackberry Nectar (
    Bolini HMA; Lima RS; Freitas RL; Medeiros AC
    Foods; 2023 Jan; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 36766077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Temporal sweetness and side tastes profiles of 16 sweeteners using temporal check-all-that-apply (TCATA).
    Tan VWK; Wee MSM; Tomic O; Forde CG
    Food Res Int; 2019 Jul; 121():39-47. PubMed ID: 31108762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rate-All-That-Apply (RATA) comparison of taste profiles for different sweeteners in black tea, chocolate milk, and natural yogurt.
    Tan VWK; Wee MSM; Tomic O; Forde CG
    J Food Sci; 2020 Feb; 85(2):486-492. PubMed ID: 31968393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sweetness potency and sweetness synergism of sweeteners in milk and coffee systems.
    Choi JH; Chung SJ
    Food Res Int; 2015 Aug; 74():168-176. PubMed ID: 28411981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identifying the interactions between natural, non-caloric sweeteners and the human sweet receptor by molecular docking.
    Acevedo W; Ramírez-Sarmiento CA; Agosin E
    Food Chem; 2018 Oct; 264():164-171. PubMed ID: 29853362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sweetness profiles of glycosyl rebaudioside A and binary mixtures with sugar alcohols in aqueous solution and a lemonade model system.
    Kim SH; Park S; Hong JH
    J Sci Food Agric; 2022 Mar; 102(5):2110-2119. PubMed ID: 34596259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensory Influence of Sweetener Addition on Traditional and Decaffeinated Espresso.
    Cusielo KVC; da Silva ACML; Tavares-Filho ER; Bolini HMA
    J Food Sci; 2019 Sep; 84(9):2628-2637. PubMed ID: 31441950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychophysical Evaluation of Sweetness Functions Across Multiple Sweeteners.
    Low JY; McBride RL; Lacy KE; Keast RS
    Chem Senses; 2017 Feb; 42(2):111-120. PubMed ID: 27765786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new sensory sweetness definition and sweetness conversion method of five natural sugars, based on the Weber-Fechner Law.
    Mao Y; Tian S; Qin Y; Han J
    Food Chem; 2019 May; 281():78-84. PubMed ID: 30658768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Molecular mechanism of sweetness sensation.
    DuBois GE
    Physiol Behav; 2016 Oct; 164(Pt B):453-463. PubMed ID: 26992959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Study protocol of the sweet tooth study, randomized controlled trial with partial food provision on the effect of low, regular and high dietary sweetness exposure on sweetness preferences in Dutch adults.
    Čad EM; Tang CS; de Jong HBT; Mars M; Appleton KM; de Graaf K
    BMC Public Health; 2023 Jan; 23(1):77. PubMed ID: 36627602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of repeated presentation on sweetness intensity of binary and ternary mixtures of sweeteners.
    Schiffman SS; Sattely-Miller EA; Graham BG; Zervakis J; Butchko HH; Stargel WW
    Chem Senses; 2003 Mar; 28(3):219-29. PubMed ID: 12714444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of frequency of consumption of artificial sweeteners on sweetness liking by women.
    Mahar A; Duizer LM
    J Food Sci; 2007 Nov; 72(9):S714-8. PubMed ID: 18034758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. e-Sweet: A Machine-Learning Based Platform for the Prediction of Sweetener and Its Relative Sweetness.
    Zheng S; Chang W; Xu W; Xu Y; Lin F
    Front Chem; 2019; 7():35. PubMed ID: 30761295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biohybrid Tongue for Evaluation of Taste Interaction between Sweetness and Sourness.
    Qin C; Chen C; Yuan Q; Jiang N; Liu M; Duan Y; Wan H; Li R; Zhuang L; Wang P
    Anal Chem; 2022 May; 94(19):6976-6985. PubMed ID: 35503097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.