These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37743455)
1. Impact of Akamine T; Nakagawa K; Ito K; Watanabe H; Yotsukura M; Yoshida Y; Yatabe Y; Kusumoto M; Watanabe SI Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 Jan; 31(1):192-200. PubMed ID: 37743455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic and prognostic values of 2-[ Han S; Kim YI; Oh JS; Seo SY; Park MJ; Lee GD; Choi S; Kim HR; Kim YH; Kim DK; Park SI; Ryu JS Eur Radiol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):1173-1183. PubMed ID: 34448035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity by Chao F; Wang R; Han X; Huang W; Wang R; Yu Y; Lin X; Yuan P; Yang M; Gao J Thorac Cancer; 2024 Jun; 15(18):1437-1445. PubMed ID: 38757212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Role of [ Civan C; Ozkan ZG; Ozkan B; Isik EG; Erdogdu E; Has Simsek D; Duman S; Sanli Y; Kara M; Kuyumcu S; Toker A Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2024 Jun; 39(5):373-380. PubMed ID: 38484307 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for evaluation of thymic epithelial tumors: utility for World Health Organization classification and predicting recurrence-free survival. Seki N; Sakamoto S; Karube Y; Oyaizu T; Ishihama H; Chida M Ann Nucl Med; 2014 Apr; 28(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 24430867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of metabolic response with Segreto S; Fonti R; Ottaviano M; Pellegrino S; Pace L; Damiano V; Palmieri G; Del Vecchio S Cancer Imaging; 2017 Mar; 17(1):10. PubMed ID: 28264726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of F-18 FDG PET/CT with optimal cut-offs of maximum standardized uptake value according to size for diagnosis of regional lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal cancer. Bae SU; Won KS; Song BI; Jeong WK; Baek SK; Kim HW Cancer Imaging; 2018 Sep; 18(1):32. PubMed ID: 30217167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lymph node standardized uptake values at pre-treatment Jeong Y; Baek S; Park JW; Joo JH; Kim JS; Lee SW Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160239. PubMed ID: 28008776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preoperative Standardized Uptake Value of Metastatic Lymph Nodes Measured by 18F-FDG PET/CT Improves the Prediction of Prognosis in Gastric Cancer. Song BI; Kim HW; Won KS; Ryu SW; Sohn SS; Kang YN Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Jul; 94(26):e1037. PubMed ID: 26131811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic Value of Metabolic and Volumetric Parameters of Preoperative FDG-PET/CT in Patients With Resectable Pancreatic Cancer. Im HJ; Oo S; Jung W; Jang JY; Kim SW; Cheon GJ; Kang KW; Chung JK; Kim EE; Lee DS Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 May; 95(19):e3686. PubMed ID: 27175707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic Value of Voskuilen CS; Schweitzer D; Jensen JB; Nielsen AM; Joniau S; Muilwijk T; Necchi A; Azizi M; Spiess PE; Briganti A; Bandini M; Goffin K; Bouchelouche K; van Werkhoven E; Shariat SF; Xylinas E; Azawi NH; Ku JH; Foerster B; van Rhijn BWG; Vegt E; Hendricksen K Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Feb; 3(1):73-79. PubMed ID: 31591037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The efficacy of Nakajo M; Takeda A; Katsuki A; Jinguji M; Ohmura K; Tani A; Sato M; Yoshiura T Br J Radiol; 2022 Jun; 95(1134):20211050. PubMed ID: 35312337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differentiating the grades of thymic epithelial tumor malignancy using textural features of intratumoral heterogeneity via (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Lee HS; Oh JS; Park YS; Jang SJ; Choi IS; Ryu JS Ann Nucl Med; 2016 May; 30(4):309-19. PubMed ID: 26868139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 18F-FDG-PET/CT predicts grade of malignancy and invasive potential of thymic epithelial tumors. Ito T; Suzuki H; Sakairi Y; Wada H; Nakajima T; Yoshino I Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2021 Feb; 69(2):274-281. PubMed ID: 32734427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Texture analysis of Nakajo M; Jinguji M; Shinaji T; Nakajo M; Aoki M; Tani A; Sato M; Yoshiura T Br J Radiol; 2018 Feb; 91(1083):20170546. PubMed ID: 29182373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. FDG PET using SUV Huang YC; Lu HI; Huang SC; Hsu CC; Chiu NT; Wang YM; Chiu YC; Li SH BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Jan; 17(1):1. PubMed ID: 28056868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A diagnostic model based on Zhou S; Tsui P; Lin M; Chen G; Chen W; Cai X BMC Med Imaging; 2024 Jan; 24(1):14. PubMed ID: 38191331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The diagnostic ability of Lee JW; Kim EY; Kim DJ; Lee JH; Kang WJ; Lee JD; Yun M Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4515-4523. PubMed ID: 26943133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The value of primary tumor (18)F-FDG uptake on preoperative PET/CT for predicting intratumoral lymphatic invasion and axillary nodal metastasis. Jung NY; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Park SY; Chung MH Breast Cancer; 2016 Sep; 23(5):712-7. PubMed ID: 26219608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]