These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37743463)

  • 1. A monocenter, patient-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study to compare cochlear implant receiver/stimulator device fixation techniques (COMFIT) with and without drilling in adults eligible for primary cochlear implantation.
    Markodimitraki LM; Harkel TCT; Bennink E; Stegeman I; Thomeer HGXM
    Trials; 2023 Sep; 24(1):605. PubMed ID: 37743463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cochlear implant fixation using a subperiosteal tight pocket without either suture or bone-recess technique.
    Jethanamest D; Channer GA; Moss WJ; Lustig LR; Telischi FF
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Jul; 124(7):1674-7. PubMed ID: 24114870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 228 cases of cochlear implant receiver-stimulator placement in a tight subperiosteal pocket without fixation.
    Sweeney AD; Carlson ML; Valenzuela CV; Wanna GB; Rivas A; Bennett ML; Haynes DS
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Apr; 152(4):712-7. PubMed ID: 25605691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cochlear Implant Fixation Techniques: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
    Markodimitraki LM; Strijbos RM; Stegeman I; Thomeer HGXM
    Otol Neurotol; 2021 Aug; 42(7):959-966. PubMed ID: 33710160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surgical outcomes with subperiosteal pocket technique for cochlear implantation in very young children.
    Cohen MS; Ha AY; Kitsko DJ; Chi DH
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Sep; 78(9):1545-7. PubMed ID: 25064628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of receiver-stimulator migration in cochlear implantation using the subperiosteal pocket technique: a prospective clinical study.
    Güldiken Y; Polat B; Enver N; Aydemir L; Çomoğlu Ş; Orhan KS
    J Laryngol Otol; 2017 Jun; 131(6):487-491. PubMed ID: 28290917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of cochlear implant bed preparation and fixation technique on the revision cochlear implantation rate.
    Pamuk AE; Pamuk G; Jafarov S; Bajin MD; Saraç S; Sennaroğlu L
    J Laryngol Otol; 2018 Jun; 132(6):534-539. PubMed ID: 29888692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of CIR-S using the subperiosteal pocket technique under 2 years of age.
    Cetinkaya EA; Yildiz M; Ensari N; Gokalp Isik U; Yılmaz GO; Aydenizoz D; Selcuk OT; Eyigor H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2022 Mar; 23(2):109-113. PubMed ID: 34852725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating cochlear insertion trauma and hearing preservation after cochlear implantation (CIPRES): a study protocol for a randomized single-blind controlled trial.
    Jwair S; Boerboom RA; Versnel H; Stokroos RJ; Thomeer HGXM
    Trials; 2021 Dec; 22(1):895. PubMed ID: 34886884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimal access cochlear implant fixation: temporalis pocket with a plate.
    Shelton C; Warren FM
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Dec; 33(9):1530-4. PubMed ID: 23064385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variability in surgical techniques for cochlear implantation: an international survey study.
    Kant E; Markodimitraki LM; Stegeman I; Thomeer HGXM
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2022 Jul; 23(4):195-202. PubMed ID: 35317714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survey of the American Neurotology Society on Cochlear Implantation: Part 2, Surgical and Device-Related Practice Patterns.
    Carlson ML; O'Connell BP; Lohse CM; Driscoll CL; Sweeney AD
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jan; 39(1):e20-e27. PubMed ID: 29210943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Cochlear Implant "Seatbelt" Technique for Receiver/Stimulator Fixation.
    Elms HL; Del Risco A; Dukes PV; Reed WT; Cunningham CD
    Laryngoscope; 2024 Jul; 134(7):3374-3376. PubMed ID: 38280101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The temporalis pocket technique for cochlear implantation: an anatomic and clinical study.
    Balkany TJ; Whitley M; Shapira Y; Angeli SI; Brown K; Eter E; Van De Water T; Telischi FF; Eshraghi AA; Treaba C
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):903-7. PubMed ID: 19730145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spontaneous bone bed formation in cochlear implantation using the subperiosteal pocket technique.
    Orhan KS; Polat B; Enver N; Çelik M; Güldiken Y; Değer K
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Dec; 35(10):1752-4. PubMed ID: 25025535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extrusion of straight cochlear implant electrodes May be diminished by proximal fixation.
    Zawawi F; Cushing SL; James AL; Gordon KA; Papsin BC
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Jan; 116():164-167. PubMed ID: 30554690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multicenter evaluation of the digisonic SP cochlear implant fixation system with titanium screws in 156 patients.
    Guevara N; Sterkers O; Bébéar JP; Meller R; Magnan J; Mosnier I; Amstutz I; Lerosey Y; Triglia JM; Roman S; Gahide I
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2010 Aug; 119(8):501-5. PubMed ID: 20860274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cochlear Implant Receiver-Stimulator Migration Using the Subperiosteal Pocket Technique: Objective Measurements of Early and Late Positioning.
    Maxwell AK; Cass SP
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Mar; 40(3):328-334. PubMed ID: 30742594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrode migration after cochlear implant surgery: more common than expected?
    Dietz A; Wennström M; Lehtimäki A; Löppönen H; Valtonen H
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Jun; 273(6):1411-8. PubMed ID: 26164294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.