These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37743567)

  • 1. Sensitivity analysis for the interactive effects of internal bias and publication bias in meta-analyses.
    Mathur MB
    Res Synth Methods; 2024 Jan; 15(1):21-43. PubMed ID: 37743567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitivity analysis for publication bias in meta-analyses.
    Mathur MB; VanderWeele TJ
    J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat; 2020 Nov; 69(5):1091-1119. PubMed ID: 33132447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating publication bias in meta-analyses of peer-reviewed studies: A meta-meta-analysis across disciplines and journal tiers.
    Mathur MB; VanderWeele TJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Mar; 12(2):176-191. PubMed ID: 33108053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. P-hacking in meta-analyses: A formalization and new meta-analytic methods.
    Mathur MB
    Res Synth Methods; 2024 May; 15(3):483-499. PubMed ID: 38273211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methods to Address Confounding and Other Biases in Meta-Analyses: Review and Recommendations.
    Mathur MB; VanderWeele TJ
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2022 Apr; 43():19-35. PubMed ID: 34535060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modelling publication bias and p-hacking.
    Moss J; De Bin R
    Biometrics; 2023 Mar; 79(1):319-331. PubMed ID: 34510407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 99% impossible: A valid, or falsifiable, internal meta-analysis.
    Vosgerau J; Simonsohn U; Nelson LD; Simmons JP
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Sep; 148(9):1628-1639. PubMed ID: 31464485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The prevalence and effect of publication bias in orthopaedic meta-analyses.
    Vavken P; Dorotka R
    J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 21360256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Bayesian "fill-in" method for correcting for publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Du H; Liu F; Wang L
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Dec; 22(4):799-817. PubMed ID: 29265851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using selection models to assess sensitivity to publication bias: A tutorial and call for more routine use.
    Maier M; VanderWeele TJ; Mathur MB
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2022 Sep; 18(3):e1256. PubMed ID: 36909879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology.
    Yang Y; Sánchez-Tójar A; O'Dea RE; Noble DWA; Koricheva J; Jennions MD; Parker TH; Lagisz M; Nakagawa S
    BMC Biol; 2023 Apr; 21(1):71. PubMed ID: 37013585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is there a "best" way to detect and minimize publication bias? An empirical evaluation.
    Pham B; Platt R; McAuley L; Klassen TP; Moher D
    Eval Health Prof; 2001 Jun; 24(2):109-25. PubMed ID: 11523382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using clinical trial registries to inform Copas selection model for publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Huang A; Komukai S; Friede T; Hattori S
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Sep; 12(5):658-673. PubMed ID: 34169657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing robustness against potential publication bias in Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) meta-analyses for fMRI.
    Acar F; Seurinck R; Eickhoff SB; Moerkerke B
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0208177. PubMed ID: 30500854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The median and the mode as robust meta-analysis estimators in the presence of small-study effects and outliers.
    Hartwig FP; Davey Smith G; Schmidt AF; Sterne JAC; Higgins JPT; Bowden J
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):397-412. PubMed ID: 32092231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitivity analysis for publication bias in meta-analysis of diagnostic studies for a continuous biomarker.
    Hattori S; Zhou XH
    Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(3):327-342. PubMed ID: 28990209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigating and dealing with publication bias and other reporting biases in meta-analyses of health research: A review.
    Page MJ; Sterne JAC; Higgins JPT; Egger M
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Mar; 12(2):248-259. PubMed ID: 33166064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.