131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37743627)
1. Wide-field Mueller matrix polarimetry for spectral characterization of basic biological tissues: Muscle, fat, connective tissue, and skin.
Pardo I; Bian S; Gomis-Brescó J; Pascual E; Canillas A; Bosch S; Arteaga O
J Biophotonics; 2024 Jan; 17(1):e202300252. PubMed ID: 37743627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mueller polarimetric imaging for surgical and diagnostic applications: a review.
Qi J; Elson DS
J Biophotonics; 2017 Aug; 10(8):950-982. PubMed ID: 28464464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mueller matrix-based characterization of cervical tissue sections: a quantitative comparison of polar and differential decomposition methods.
Kumar N; Kumar Nayak J; Pradhan A; Ghosh N
J Biomed Opt; 2024 May; 29(5):052916. PubMed ID: 38328279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Registration of polarimetric images for in vivo skin diagnostics.
Jütte L; Sharma G; Patel H; Roth B
J Biomed Opt; 2022 Aug; 27(9):. PubMed ID: 36042549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exploring the evolution of circular polarized light backscattered from turbid tissue-like disperse medium utilizing generalized Monte Carlo modeling approach with a combined use of Jones and Stokes-Mueller formalisms.
Lopushenko I; Sieryi O; Bykov A; Meglinski I
J Biomed Opt; 2024 May; 29(5):052913. PubMed ID: 38089555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative study of differential matrix and extended polar decomposition formalisms for polarimetric characterization of complex tissue-like turbid media.
Kumar S; Purwar H; Ossikovski R; Vitkin IA; Ghosh N
J Biomed Opt; 2012 Oct; 17(10):105006. PubMed ID: 23064484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of combined polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography and Mueller matrix imaging for the polarimetric characterization of excised biological tissue.
Chue-Sang J; Bai Y; Stoff S; Straton D; Ramaswamy S; Ramella-Roman JC
J Biomed Opt; 2016 Jul; 21(7):71109. PubMed ID: 26934019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative study of the imaging contrasts of Mueller matrix derived parameters between transmission and backscattering polarimetry.
Liu T; Sun T; He H; Liu S; Dong Y; Wu J; Ma H
Biomed Opt Express; 2018 Sep; 9(9):4413-4428. PubMed ID: 30615708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of tissue polarimetric properties using Stokes polarimetric imaging with circularly polarized illumination.
Qi J; He H; Lin J; Dong Y; Chen D; Ma H; Elson DS
J Biophotonics; 2018 Apr; 11(4):e201700139. PubMed ID: 29131523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mueller-matrix imaging polarimetry elevated by wavelet decomposition and polarization-singular processing for analysis of specific cancerous tissue pathology.
Sdobnov A; Ushenko VA; Trifonyuk L; Bakun O; Garazdyuk M; Soltys IV; Dubolazov O; Ushenko OG; Ushenko YA; Bykov A; Meglinski I
J Biomed Opt; 2023 Oct; 28(10):102903. PubMed ID: 37425430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Polar decomposition of 3 x 3 Mueller matrix: a tool for quantitative tissue polarimetry.
Swami MK; Manhas S; Buddhiwant P; Ghosh N; Uppal A; Gupta PK
Opt Express; 2006 Oct; 14(20):9324-37. PubMed ID: 19529316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evolution of raw meat polarization-based properties by means of Mueller matrix imaging.
Peyvasteh M; Popov A; Bykov A; Pierangelo A; Novikova T; Meglinski I
J Biophotonics; 2021 May; 14(5):e202000376. PubMed ID: 33220020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of scattering and birefringence in phase retardation revealed by locus of Stokes vector on Poincaré sphere.
Borovkova M; Bykov A; Popov A; Meglinski I
J Biomed Opt; 2020 May; 25(5):1-13. PubMed ID: 32436372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of tissue microstructure with Mueller microscopy: logarithmic decomposition and Monte Carlo modeling.
Li P; Lee HR; Chandel S; Lotz C; Groeber-Becker FK; Dembski S; Ossikovski R; Ma H; Novikova T
J Biomed Opt; 2020 Jan; 25(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 31933331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Polarimetric comparison of fresh and frozen skeletal muscle tissues of goat.
Yousaf MS; Khurshid A; Mahmood R; Ikram M
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2020 Dec; 32():102071. PubMed ID: 33130029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative fluorescence and elastic scattering tissue polarimetry using an Eigenvalue calibrated spectroscopic Mueller matrix system.
Soni J; Purwar H; Lakhotia H; Chandel S; Banerjee C; Kumar U; Ghosh N
Opt Express; 2013 Jul; 21(13):15475-89. PubMed ID: 23842335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differential Mueller matrix imaging of partially depolarizing optically anisotropic biological tissues.
Trifonyuk L; Sdobnov A; Baranowski W; Ushenko V; Olar O; Dubolazov A; Pidkamin L; Sidor M; Vanchuliak O; Motrich A; Gorsky M; Meglinski I
Lasers Med Sci; 2020 Jun; 35(4):877-891. PubMed ID: 31749042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital histology with Mueller microscopy: how to mitigate an impact of tissue cut thickness fluctuations.
Lee HR; Li P; Yoo TSH; Lotz C; Groeber-Becker FK; Dembski S; Garcia-Caurel E; Ossikovski R; Ma H; Novikova T
J Biomed Opt; 2019 Jul; 24(7):1-9. PubMed ID: 31347339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analyzing the influence of oblique incidence on quantitative backscattering tissue polarimetry: a pilot
Zhang Z; Shao C; He H; He C; Liu S; Ma H
J Biomed Opt; 2023 Oct; 28(10):102905. PubMed ID: 37554626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Histopathological correlations of bulk tissue polarimetric images: Case study.
Sharma M; Narayanan Unni S; Balasubramanian S; Sundaram S; Krishnamurthy P; Hegde A
J Biophotonics; 2021 May; 14(5):e202000475. PubMed ID: 33533565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
