These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37744169)

  • 1. To eat, or not to eat: a phantom decoy affects information-gathering behavior by a free-ranging mammalian herbivore.
    Orlando CG; Banks PB; Latty T; McArthur C
    Behav Ecol; 2023; 34(5):759-768. PubMed ID: 37744169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why Do Irrelevant Alternatives Matter? An fMRI-TMS Study of Context-Dependent Preferences.
    Chung HK; Sjöström T; Lee HJ; Lu YT; Tsuo FY; Chen TS; Chang CF; Juan CH; Kuo WJ; Huang CY
    J Neurosci; 2017 Nov; 37(48):11647-11661. PubMed ID: 29109242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Context-effect bias in capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.): exploring decoy influences in a value-based food choice task.
    Marini M; Boschetti C; Gastaldi S; Addessi E; Paglieri F
    Anim Cogn; 2023 Mar; 26(2):503-514. PubMed ID: 36125642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Menu engineering to encourage sustainable food choices when dining out: An online trial of priced-based decoys.
    Attwood S; Chesworth SJ; Parkin BL
    Appetite; 2020 Jun; 149():104601. PubMed ID: 31953144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phantom alternatives influence food preferences in the eastern honeybee Apis cerana.
    Tan K; Dong S; Liu X; Chen W; Wang Y; Oldroyd BP; Latty T
    J Anim Ecol; 2015 Mar; 84(2):509-17. PubMed ID: 25251672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of phantom decoys on choices in cats.
    Scarpi D
    Anim Cogn; 2011 Jan; 14(1):127-36. PubMed ID: 20838836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual differences in decision making by foraging hummingbirds.
    Morgan KV; Hurly TA; Healy SD
    Behav Processes; 2014 Nov; 109 Pt B():195-200. PubMed ID: 25181327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Leaf odour cues enable non-random foraging by mammalian herbivores.
    Finnerty PB; Stutz RS; Price CJ; Banks PB; McArthur C
    J Anim Ecol; 2017 Oct; 86(6):1317-1328. PubMed ID: 28833142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Context-dependent foraging decisions in rufous hummingbirds.
    Bateson M; Healy SD; Hurly TA
    Proc Biol Sci; 2003 Jun; 270(1521):1271-6. PubMed ID: 12816640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decoy effects in intertemporal and probabilistic choices the role of time pressure, immediacy, and certainty.
    Marini M; Paglieri F
    Behav Processes; 2019 May; 162():130-141. PubMed ID: 30849515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of phantom decoys on the neural processing of valuation.
    Wu S; Yu R
    Brain Struct Funct; 2020 Jun; 225(5):1523-1535. PubMed ID: 32385518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How do insects choose flowers? A review of multi-attribute flower choice and decoy effects in flower-visiting insects.
    Latty T; Trueblood JS
    J Anim Ecol; 2020 Dec; 89(12):2750-2762. PubMed ID: 32961583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The power of odour cues in shaping fine-scale search patterns of foraging mammalian herbivores.
    Orlando CG; Tews A; Banks P; McArthur C
    Biol Lett; 2020 Jul; 16(7):20200329. PubMed ID: 32673541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Social decoys: Leveraging choice architecture to alter social preferences.
    Chang LW; Cikara M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 Aug; 115(2):206-223. PubMed ID: 30024241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The neural correlates of the decoy effect in decisions.
    Hu J; Yu R
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2014; 8():271. PubMed ID: 25147516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantifying the response of free-ranging mammalian herbivores to the interplay between plant defense and nutrient concentrations.
    Bedoya-Pérez MA; Issa DD; Banks PB; McArthur C
    Oecologia; 2014 Aug; 175(4):1167-77. PubMed ID: 24924590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The rationality of decisions depends on behavioural context.
    Glaser GL; Miller MC; Healy SD; Shuker DM
    Behav Processes; 2021 Jan; 182():104293. PubMed ID: 33290832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A map of decoy influence in human multialternative choice.
    Dumbalska T; Li V; Tsetsos K; Summerfield C
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Oct; 117(40):25169-25178. PubMed ID: 32958673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Follow your nose: leaf odour as an important foraging cue for mammalian herbivores.
    Stutz RS; Banks PB; Proschogo N; McArthur C
    Oecologia; 2016 Nov; 182(3):643-51. PubMed ID: 27368609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Roles of the volatile terpene, 1,8-cineole, in plant-herbivore interactions: a foraging odor cue as well as a toxin?
    Bedoya-Pérez MA; Isler I; Banks PB; McArthur C
    Oecologia; 2014 Mar; 174(3):827-37. PubMed ID: 24122179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.