These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37744525)
1. Investigating the feasibility of using Ethos generated treatment plans for head and neck cancer patients. El-Qmache A; McLellan J Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol; 2023 Sep; 27():100216. PubMed ID: 37744525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of efficacy in automated plan generation for Varian Ethos intelligent optimization engine. Pokharel S; Pacheco A; Tanner S J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 23(4):e13539. PubMed ID: 35084090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Ethos intelligent optimization engine for left locally advanced breast cancer. Prunaretty J; Lopez L; Cabaillé M; Bourgier C; Morel A; Azria D; Fenoglietto P Front Oncol; 2024; 14():1399978. PubMed ID: 39015493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of an automated template-based treatment planning system for radiotherapy of anal, rectal and prostate cancer. Calmels L; Sibolt P; Åström LM; Serup-Hansen E; Lindberg H; Fromm AL; Persson G; Sjöström D; Geertsen P; Behrens CP Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol; 2022 Jun; 22():30-36. PubMed ID: 35464888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A treatment planning study comparing Elekta VMAT and fixed field IMRT using the varian treatment planning system eclipse. Peters S; Schiefer H; Plasswilm L Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jul; 9():153. PubMed ID: 25011529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Benchmarking Automated Machine Learning-Enhanced Planning With Ethos Against Manual and Knowledge-Based Planning for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer. Pogue JA; Cardenas CE; Harms J; Soike MH; Kole AJ; Schneider CS; Veale C; Popple R; Belliveau JG; McDonald AM; Stanley DN Adv Radiat Oncol; 2023; 8(6):101292. PubMed ID: 37457825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of semi-automated stereotactic treatment planning for online adaptive radiotherapy in ethos. Byrne M; Archibald-Heeren B; Hu Y; Greer P; Luo S; Aland T Med Dosim; 2022 Winter; 47(4):342-347. PubMed ID: 36127189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Leveraging intelligent optimization for automated, cardiac-sparing accelerated partial breast treatment planning. Pogue JA; Cardenas CE; Cao Y; Popple RA; Soike M; Boggs DH; Stanley DN; Harms J Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1130119. PubMed ID: 36845685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigation of pulsed IMRT and VMAT for re-irradiation treatments: dosimetric and delivery feasibilities. Lin MH; Price RA; Li J; Kang S; Li J; Ma CM Phys Med Biol; 2013 Nov; 58(22):8179-96. PubMed ID: 24200917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective trial of volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs conventional intensity modulated radiation therapy in advanced head and neck cancer. Fung-Kee-Fung SD; Hackett R; Hales L; Warren G; Singh AK World J Clin Oncol; 2012 Apr; 3(4):57-62. PubMed ID: 22553505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical validation and benchmarking of knowledge-based IMRT and VMAT treatment planning in pelvic anatomy. Hussein M; South CP; Barry MA; Adams EJ; Jordan TJ; Stewart AJ; Nisbet A Radiother Oncol; 2016 Sep; 120(3):473-479. PubMed ID: 27427380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of the Monitor Unit Objective tool for VMAT in the Eclipse treatment planning system. Jiménez-Puertas S; Sánchez-Artuñedo D; Hermida-López M Rep Pract Oncol Radiother; 2018; 23(2):121-125. PubMed ID: 29556140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automatic treatment planning improves the clinical quality of head and neck cancer treatment plans. Hansen CR; Bertelsen A; Hazell I; Zukauskaite R; Gyldenkerne N; Johansen J; Eriksen JG; Brink C Clin Transl Radiat Oncol; 2016 Dec; 1():2-8. PubMed ID: 29657987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy for the treatment of a large planning target volume in thoracic esophageal cancer. Abbas AS; Moseley D; Kassam Z; Kim SM; Cho C J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 May; 14(3):4269. PubMed ID: 23652258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs. c-IMRT in esophageal cancer: a treatment planning comparison. Yin L; Wu H; Gong J; Geng JH; Jiang F; Shi AH; Yu R; Li YH; Han SK; Xu B; Zhu GY World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Oct; 18(37):5266-75. PubMed ID: 23066322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of a realistic breathing lung phantom to evaluate dose delivery errors. Court LE; Seco J; Lu XQ; Ebe K; Mayo C; Ionascu D; Winey B; Giakoumakis N; Aristophanous M; Berbeco R; Rottman J; Bogdanov M; Schofield D; Lingos T Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5850-7. PubMed ID: 21158297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric and planning efficiency comparison for lung SBRT: CyberKnife vs VMAT vs knowledge-based VMAT. Yu S; Xu H; Sinclair A; Zhang X; Langner U; Mak K Med Dosim; 2020 Winter; 45(4):346-351. PubMed ID: 32532613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of AAPM TG 119 to volumetric arc therapy (VMAT). Mynampati DK; Yaparpalvi R; Hong L; Kuo HC; Mah D J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 13(5):3382. PubMed ID: 22955639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetric comparison of MR-linac-based IMRT and conventional VMAT treatment plans for prostate cancer. Da Silva Mendes V; Nierer L; Li M; Corradini S; Reiner M; Kamp F; Niyazi M; Kurz C; Landry G; Belka C Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jul; 16(1):133. PubMed ID: 34289868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]