These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3774503)

  • 1. Variations in size of the visual field in which targets are presented: an attentional range effect.
    LaBerge D; Brown V
    Percept Psychophys; 1986 Sep; 40(3):188-200. PubMed ID: 3774503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perception of lowercase letters in peripheral vision: a discrimination matrix based on saccade latencies.
    Jacobs AM; Nazir TA; Heller O
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jul; 46(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 2755768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perception of signals presented in the periphery of the visual field.
    Houtmans MJ; Sanders AF
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1984 Mar; 55(2):143-55. PubMed ID: 6731002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of sleep-loss on processing information in the functional visual field.
    Sanders AF; Reitsma WD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1982 Sep; 51(2):149-62. PubMed ID: 7148488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of visual attention on peripheral discrimination thresholds in single and multiple element displays.
    Müller HJ; Findlay JM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1988 Nov; 69(2):129-55. PubMed ID: 3245479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Spatial attention: objections to the spotlight model of visual selectivity].
    Buchner A
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1988; 35(4):523-45. PubMed ID: 3218272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatio-temporal discrimination of frequency in the right and left visual fields: a preliminary report.
    Rao SM; Rourke D; Whitman RD
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Aug; 53(1):311-6. PubMed ID: 7290879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Size of the attentional focus and efficiency of processing.
    Castiello U; Umiltà C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1990 Apr; 73(3):195-209. PubMed ID: 2353586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hemispheric differences on sequential effects in a choice reaction task.
    Possamaï CA
    Neuropsychologia; 1981; 19(6):775-9. PubMed ID: 7329523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual search and stimulus similarity.
    Duncan J; Humphreys GW
    Psychol Rev; 1989 Jul; 96(3):433-58. PubMed ID: 2756067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attentional priming and visual search in pigeons.
    Blough PM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1989 Oct; 15(4):358-65. PubMed ID: 2794871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detectability gradients as a function of target location.
    Yund EW; Efron R; Nichols DR
    Brain Cogn; 1990 Jan; 12(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 2297427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feature perturbations are no guessing strategy artifact.
    Chastain G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1987 Jun; 65(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 3618291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detectability as a function of spatial location: effects of selective attention.
    Yund EW; Efron R; Nichols DR
    Brain Cogn; 1990 Jan; 12(1):42-54. PubMed ID: 2297434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attention and interference in the perception of brief visual displays.
    Dixon P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1986 May; 12(2):133-48. PubMed ID: 2940318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Complexity effects on reaction-time measures of visual persistence: evidence for peripheral and central contributions.
    Long GM; Wurst SA
    Am J Psychol; 1984; 97(4):537-61. PubMed ID: 6517163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Continuation of visual-field mapping for a target embedded in a regular background.
    Courtney AJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1989 Dec; 69(3 Pt 1):843-9. PubMed ID: 2608399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parallel processing of two disjunctive targets.
    Arguin M; Cavanagh P
    Percept Psychophys; 1988 Jul; 44(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 3405726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Directing attention in the visual field.
    Duncan J
    Percept Psychophys; 1981 Jul; 30(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 7290900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. More rapid visual identification rate in search of a missing stimulus.
    Inamori Y; Inamori R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Apr; 70(2):570. PubMed ID: 2342858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.