These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3774518)

  • 1. Evaluating the Contourhook--help or hindrance?
    Angliss VE
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1986 Aug; 10(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 3774518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prosthetic use in adult upper limb amputees: a comparison of the body powered and electrically powered prostheses.
    Millstein SG; Heger H; Hunter GA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1986 Apr; 10(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 3725563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preliminary assessment of three new designs of prosthetic prehensors for upper limb amputees.
    Meeks D; LeBlanc M
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1988 Apr; 12(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 3399368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do users want to receive a DEKA Arm and why? Overall findings from the Veterans Affairs Study to optimize the DEKA Arm.
    Resnik L; Latlief G; Klinger SL; Sasson N; Walters LS
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Dec; 38(6):456-66. PubMed ID: 24286806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consumer concerns and the functional value of prostheses to upper limb amputees.
    Kejlaa GH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1993 Dec; 17(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 8134275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Functional comparison of upper extremity amputees using myoelectric and conventional prostheses.
    Stein RB; Walley M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1983 Jun; 64(6):243-8. PubMed ID: 6860093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of myoelectric and conventional prostheses for adolescent amputees.
    Weaver SA; Lange LR; Vogts VM
    Am J Occup Ther; 1988 Feb; 42(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 3348341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does the DEKA Arm substitute for or supplement conventional prostheses.
    Resnik L; Acluche F; Lieberman Klinger S; Borgia M
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Oct; 42(5):534-543. PubMed ID: 28905665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Motion pattern analysis for evaluation and design of a prosthetic hook.
    Gilad I
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1985 Jun; 66(6):399-402. PubMed ID: 4004541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Grasp and force based taxonomy of split-hook prosthetic terminal devices.
    Belter JT; Reynolds BC; Dollar AM
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():6613-8. PubMed ID: 25571512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of body-powered upper limb prostheses by able-bodied subjects, using the Box and Blocks Test and the Nine-Hole Peg Test.
    Haverkate L; Smit G; Plettenburg DH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Feb; 40(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 25336050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of standardized activities on validity of Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control.
    Lindner HY; Eliasson AC; Hermansson LM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013; 50(10):1391-400. PubMed ID: 24699974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Individualizing goals for users of externally powered partial hand prostheses.
    Whelan L; Flinn S; Wagner N
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(6):885-94. PubMed ID: 25478950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determination of the design specifications of a powered humeral rotator for a myoelectric prosthesis.
    Troncossi M; Caminati R; Parenti-Castelli V
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 May; 225(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 21755778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of disabilities and activities of daily living of war-related bilateral lower extremity amputees.
    Ebrahimzadeh MH; Moradi A; Bozorgnia S; Hallaj-Moghaddam M
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Feb; 40(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 25249384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recreational terminal devices for children with upper extremity amputations.
    Walker JL; Coburn TR; Cottle W; Burke C; Talwalkar VR
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2008 Mar; 28(2):271-3. PubMed ID: 18388728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of arm and prosthetic functioning in children with a congenital transverse reduction deficiency of the upper limb.
    Buffart LM; Roebroeck ME; van Heijningen VG; Pesch-Batenburg JM; Stam HJ
    J Rehabil Med; 2007 May; 39(5):379-86. PubMed ID: 17549329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prosthetic limb use in Australia 1981-1985 under the Free Limb Scheme.
    Jones LE
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1989 Aug; 13(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 2780264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of voluntary opening Ottobock Hook and Hosmer Hook for upper limb prosthetics: a preliminary study.
    Hashim NA; Abd Razak NAB; Gholizadeh H; Osman NAA
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2017 Aug; 62(4):447-454. PubMed ID: 27865091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lightweight prostheses for bilateral below-elbow amputees.
    Rout SN
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1993 Aug; 17(2):126-9. PubMed ID: 8233769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.