These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37746520)
1. Implementation of a Robotic Gynecologic Surgery Program in a Rural Setting: Impact on Presence of Assistant Surgeon and Route of Hysterectomy. Alligood-Percoco NR; Huggler AD; McQuillen AN JSLS; 2023; 27(3):. PubMed ID: 37746520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications-surgical volume matters: a retrospective cohort study comparing complications of robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic hysterectomies. Baracy MG; Martinez M; Hagglund K; Afzal F; Kulkarni S; Corey L; Aslam MF J Robot Surg; 2022 Oct; 16(5):1199-1207. PubMed ID: 34981444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multicenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications. Lim PC; Crane JT; English EJ; Farnam RW; Garza DM; Winter ML; Rozeboom JL Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 26952352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of robotic technology on hysterectomy route and associated implications for resident education. Jeppson PC; Rahimi S; Gattoc L; Westermann LB; Cichowski S; Raker C; LeBrun EEW; Sung VW; Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):196.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25068556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus. Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pedagogic Approach in the Surgical Learning: The First Period of "Assistant Surgeon" May Improve the Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy. Favre A; Huberlant S; Carbonnel M; Goetgheluck J; Revaux A; Ayoubi JM Front Surg; 2016; 3():58. PubMed ID: 27853733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Progressive reduction in abdominal hysterectomy rates: impact of laparoscopy, robotics and surgeon factors. Moen M; Noone M; Cholkeri-Singh A; Vassallo B; Locker B; Miller C J Robot Surg; 2014 Mar; 8(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 27637233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice. Payne TN; Dauterive FR J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications. Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Longer Operative Time During Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Perioperative Complications. Catanzarite T; Saha S; Pilecki MA; Kim JY; Milad MP J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1049-58. PubMed ID: 26070725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of bowel preparation does not reduce postoperative infectious morbidity following minimally invasive or open hysterectomies. Kalogera E; Van Houten HK; Sangaralingham LR; Borah BJ; Dowdy SC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):231.e1-231.e12. PubMed ID: 32112733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost analysis when open surgeons perform minimally invasive hysterectomy. Shepherd JP; Kantartzis KL; Ahn KH; Bonidie MJ; Lee T JSLS; 2014; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 25489215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of robotics on the mode of benign hysterectomy and clinical outcomes. Luciano AA; Luciano DE; Gabbert J; Seshadri-Kreaden U Int J Med Robot; 2016 Mar; 12(1):114-24. PubMed ID: 25753111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost variance across obesity class for women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy by high-volume gynecologic surgeons. Klebanoff JS; Tyan P; Nishikawa M; North A; Amdur R; Sparks A; Kazma JM; Moawad GN J Robot Surg; 2020 Dec; 14(6):903-907. PubMed ID: 32253574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of robotic surgery on hysterectomy trends: implications for resident education. Yamasato K; Casey D; Kaneshiro B; Hiraoka M J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 24172026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors Associated With Hemostatic Agent Use During Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. Kakos A; Allen V; Whiteside J J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1167-1171. PubMed ID: 27590570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of power morcellator removal on hysterectomy practice patterns. Wesol A; Woolley S Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Aug; 215():41-44. PubMed ID: 28599164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variability between individual surgeons in route of hysterectomy for patients with endometrial cancer in Florida. Carrubba AR; Osagiede O; Spaulding AC; Cochuyt JJ; Hodge DO; Robertson MW; DeStephano CC Surg Oncol; 2019 Dec; 31():55-60. PubMed ID: 31539642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]