122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37746889)
1. Performance of the new MC-80 automated digital cell morphology analyser in detection of normal and abnormal blood cells: Comparison with the CellaVision DM9600.
Merino A; Laguna J; Rodríguez-García M; Julian J; Casanova A; Molina A
Int J Lab Hematol; 2024 Feb; 46(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 37746889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. White blood cell differentials performance of a new automated digital cell morphology analyzer: Mindray MC-80.
Khongjaroensakun N; Chaothai N; Chamchomdao L; Suriyachand K; Paisooksantivatana K
Int J Lab Hematol; 2023 Oct; 45(5):691-699. PubMed ID: 37338111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance comparison of two automated digital morphology analyzers for leukocyte differential in patients with malignant hematological diseases: Mindray MC-80 and Sysmex DI-60.
Ye X; Fang L; Chen Y; Tong J; Ning X; Feng L; Xu Y; Yang D
Int J Lab Hematol; 2024 Jun; 46(3):457-465. PubMed ID: 38212663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the performance of two automatic cell morphology analyzers for peripheral-blood leukocyte morphology analysis: Mindray MC-100i and Sysmex DI-60.
Zhang S; He Y; Wu W; Tan H; Xie S; Liu M; Chen W; Sun D
Int J Lab Hematol; 2023 Dec; 45(6):860-868. PubMed ID: 37575073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Artificial intelligence and the blood film: Performance of the MC-80 digital morphology analyzer in samples with neoplastic and reactive cell types.
Zini G; Mancini F; Rossi E; Landucci S; d'Onofrio G
Int J Lab Hematol; 2023 Dec; 45(6):881-889. PubMed ID: 37641457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of the digital cell morphology analyzer MC-100i in a multicenter study in tertiary hospitals in China.
Jiang H; Xu W; Chen W; He J; Jiang H; Mao Z; Liu M; Li M; Liu D; Pan Y; Qu C; Qu L; Sun Z; Sun D; Wang X; Wang J; Wu W; Xing Y; Zhang S; Zhang C; Zheng L; Guan M
Clin Chim Acta; 2024 Mar; 555():117801. PubMed ID: 38296220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Performance evaluation of the CellaVision DM96 system in WBC differentials].
Yamamoto T; Tabe Y; Ishii K; Itoh S; Maeno I; Matsumoto K; Horii T; Miida T; Ohsaka A
Rinsho Byori; 2010 Sep; 58(9):884-90. PubMed ID: 20963948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated digital cell morphology identification system (CellaVision DM96) is very useful for leukocyte differentials in specimens with qualitative or quantitative abnormalities.
Park SH; Park CJ; Choi MO; Kim MJ; Cho YU; Jang S; Chi HS
Int J Lab Hematol; 2013 Oct; 35(5):517-27. PubMed ID: 23286314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Red and white blood cell morphology characterization and hands-on time analysis by the digital cell imaging analyzer DI-60.
Kweon OJ; Lim YK; Lee MK; Kim HR
PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0267638. PubMed ID: 35476704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated leucocyte differentials in 292 patients with leucopenia: an evaluation of the Abbott CELL-DYN 3500 (CD3500) haematology analyser.
Burchert-Graeve M; Kock R
Clin Lab Haematol; 1996 Dec; 18(4):253-9. PubMed ID: 9054698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the CellaVision Advanced RBC Application for Detecting Red Blood Cell Morphological Abnormalities.
Park SJ; Yoon J; Kwon JA; Yoon SY
Ann Lab Med; 2021 Jan; 41(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 32829578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of digital morphology analyzer Vision Pro on white blood cell differentials.
Yoon S; Hur M; Park M; Kim H; Kim SW; Lee TH; Nam M; Moon HW; Yun YM
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2021 May; 59(6):1099-1106. PubMed ID: 33470955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Serous body fluid evaluation using the new automated haematology analyser Mindray BC-6800Plus.
Boldú L; Laguna J; Casanova A; García S; Molina A; Merino A
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2022 Oct; 60(11):1786-1795. PubMed ID: 36039597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of automated digital cell imaging analyzer Sysmex DI-60.
Kim HN; Hur M; Kim H; Kim SW; Moon HW; Yun YM
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Nov; 56(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 28672770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Performance evaluation and validation of automated digital image analysis in peripheral blood cells morphology examination].
Wang R; Yang MY; Zhang JY; Su HQ; Duan J; Mi J; Wang ML
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Jan; 102(4):261-266. PubMed ID: 35073674
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of the CellaVision DC-1 digital cell imaging analyser for differential counting and morphological classification of blood cells.
van der Vorm LN; Hendriks HA; Smits SM
J Clin Pathol; 2023 Mar; 76(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 34620610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Clinical application of automated digital image analysis for morphology review of peripheral blood leukocyte].
Xing Y; Yan X; Pu C; Shang K; Dong N; Wang R; Wang J
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Mar; 96(8):634-9. PubMed ID: 26932858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance evaluation of the CellaVision DM96 system: WBC differentials by automated digital image analysis supported by an artificial neural network.
Kratz A; Bengtsson HI; Casey JE; Keefe JM; Beatrice GH; Grzybek DY; Lewandrowski KB; Van Cott EM
Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Nov; 124(5):770-81. PubMed ID: 16203273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical performance evaluation of the CellaVision Image Capture System in the white blood cell differential on peripheral blood smears.
Smits SM; Leyte A
J Clin Pathol; 2014 Feb; 67(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 24043716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Blast flagging of the Sysmex XN-10 hematology analyzer with supervised cell image analysis: Impact on quality parameters.
Petrone J; Jackups R; Eby CS; Shimer G; Anderson J; Frater JL
Int J Lab Hematol; 2019 Oct; 41(5):601-606. PubMed ID: 31162809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
