BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37747527)

  • 1. Retraction of Gupta et al. (2018).
    J Couns Psychol; 2023 Oct; 70(5):509. PubMed ID: 37747527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Client laughter in psychodynamic psychotherapy: Not a laughing matter.
    Gupta S; Hill CE; Kivlighan DM
    J Couns Psychol; 2018 Jul; 65(4):463-473. PubMed ID: 29999371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retraction of Keum et al. (2021).
    J Couns Psychol; 2023 Jul; 70(4):448. PubMed ID: 37428768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retraction of O'Connor et al. (2019).
    J Couns Psychol; 2023 Jul; 70(4):449. PubMed ID: 37428770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retraction of Kivlighan et al. (2016).
    J Couns Psychol; 2023 Oct; 70(5):463. PubMed ID: 37747526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retraction of Kivlighan et al. (2017).
    J Couns Psychol; 2023 Jul; 70(4):447. PubMed ID: 37428766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retraction of Robinson et al. (2015).
    J Couns Psychol; 2023 Oct; 70(5):618. PubMed ID: 37747531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retraction of An et al. (2022).
    J Couns Psychol; 2023 Jul; 70(4):402. PubMed ID: 37428763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retraction of Morales et al. (2018).
    Psychotherapy (Chic); 2023 Sep; 60(3):406. PubMed ID: 37578784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retraction of Cuttler et al. (2019).
    Psychotherapy (Chic); 2023 Sep; 60(3):416. PubMed ID: 37578785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retraction of Hill et al. (2015).
    J Couns Psychol; 2023 Oct; 70(5):604. PubMed ID: 37747530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retraction of Li et al. (2021).
    J Couns Psychol; 2023 Jul; 70(4):449. PubMed ID: 37428769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retraction of Lu et al. (2022).
    J Couns Psychol; 2023 Jul; 70(4):448. PubMed ID: 37428767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A strong alliance is not enough: Item-level variation in an alliance measure moderates the alliance strength and client outcome relationship.
    An M; Kivlighan DM; Hill CE
    J Couns Psychol; 2022 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 35939613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retraction of Rim et al. (2022).
    J Couns Psychol; 2023 Jul; 70(4):423. PubMed ID: 37428764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retraction of Hillman et al. (2022).
    J Couns Psychol; 2023 Jul; 70(4):435. PubMed ID: 37428765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retraction of Marks et al. (2019).
    J Couns Psychol; 2023 Oct; 70(5):534. PubMed ID: 37747528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retraction of Gerstenblith et al. (2022).
    J Couns Psychol; 2023 Oct; 70(5):561. PubMed ID: 37747529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Therapist-client agreement about their working alliance: Associations with attachment styles.
    O'Connor S; Kivlighan DM; Hill CE; Gelso CJ
    J Couns Psychol; 2019 Jan; 66(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 30091622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do therapists improve in their ability to assess clients' satisfaction? A truth and bias model.
    Keum BT; Morales Dixon K; Kivlighan DM; Hill CE; Gelso CJ
    J Couns Psychol; 2021 Oct; 68(5):608-620. PubMed ID: 32673003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.