127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37748269)
1. Utility of the revised FIGO2023 staging with molecular classification in endometrial cancer.
Kobayashi-Kato M; Fujii E; Asami Y; Ahiko Y; Hiranuma K; Terao Y; Matsumoto K; Ishikawa M; Kohno T; Kato T; Shiraishi K; Yoshida H
Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Nov; 178():36-43. PubMed ID: 37748269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combination of Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial cancer (ProMisE) with sonographic and demographic characteristics in preoperative prediction of recurrence or progression of endometrial cancer.
Eriksson LSE; Nastic D; Lindqvist PG; Imboden S; Järnbert-Pettersson H; Carlson JW; Epstein E
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 58(3):457-468. PubMed ID: 33314410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differentiation of survival outcomes by anatomic involvement and histology with the revised 2023 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for endometrial cancer.
Gravbrot N; Weil CR; DeCesaris CM; Gaffney DK; Suneja G; Burt LM
Eur J Cancer; 2024 Apr; 201():113913. PubMed ID: 38377777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Nomogram is More Accurate than the 2009 FIGO Staging System in the Prediction of Overall Survival in a German Endometrial Cancer Patient Cohort.
Huss A; Ihorst G; Timme-Bronsert S; Hasenburg A; Oehler MK; Klar M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 25(13):3966-3973. PubMed ID: 30238246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cyclooxygenase-2 and p53 expressions in endometrial cancer.
Jeon YT; Kang S; Kang DH; Yoo KY; Park IA; Bang YJ; Kim JW; Park NH; Kang SB; Lee HP; Song YS
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Sep; 13(9):1538-42. PubMed ID: 15342458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Confirmation of ProMisE: A simple, genomics-based clinical classifier for endometrial cancer.
Talhouk A; McConechy MK; Leung S; Yang W; Lum A; Senz J; Boyd N; Pike J; Anglesio M; Kwon JS; Karnezis AN; Huntsman DG; Gilks CB; McAlpine JN
Cancer; 2017 Mar; 123(5):802-813. PubMed ID: 28061006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identification of
Beinse G; Rance B; Just PA; Izac B; Letourneur F; Saidu NEB; Chouzenoux S; Nicco C; Goldwasser F; Batteux F; Durdux C; Chapron C; Pasmant E; Leroy K; Alexandre J; Borghese B
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):640-647. PubMed ID: 32169874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. FIGO staging of endometrial cancer: 2023.
Berek JS; Matias-Guiu X; Creutzberg C; Fotopoulou C; Gaffney D; Kehoe S; Lindemann K; Mutch D; Concin N;
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Aug; 162(2):383-394. PubMed ID: 37337978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of model fit and discriminatory ability of M category as defined by the 7th and 8th editions of the tumor-node-metastasis classification of colorectal cancer and the 9th edition of the Japanese classification.
Shida D; Boku N; Nakamura Y; Yoshida T; Tanabe T; Yasui K; Takashima A; Kanemitsu Y
Cancer Med; 2021 Oct; 10(20):6937-6946. PubMed ID: 34587374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Construction and validation of a prognostic model for stage IIIC endometrial cancer patients after surgery.
Yang XL; Huang H; Kou LN; Lai H; Chen XP; Wu DJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 May; 48(5):1173-1180. PubMed ID: 34972620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic value of the 2009 FIGO staging for endometrial cancer: an illustration of the E3N cohort.
Koskas M; Chabbert-Buffet N; Bendifallah S; Luton D; Clavel-Chapelon F; Rouzier R
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Mar; 22(3):447-51. PubMed ID: 22367322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of 108 patients with endometrial carcinoma using the PROMISE classification and additional genetic analyses for MMR-D.
Timmerman S; Van Rompuy AS; Van Gorp T; Vanden Bempt I; Brems H; Van Nieuwenhuysen E; Han SN; Neven P; Victoor J; Laenen A; Vergote I
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Apr; 157(1):245-251. PubMed ID: 31980219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. p53 overexpression as a prognostic indicator in endometrial carcinoma.
Ozalp S; Yalcin OT; Tanir HM; Kabukcuoglu S; Erol G
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2003; 24(3-4):275-8. PubMed ID: 12807239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endometrial adenocarcinoma recurring in the lung: impact of molecular profile and role of local therapies on prognosis.
Luzarraga Aznar A; Bebia V; López-Gil C; Giraldo A; Montoya MP; Verges R; Jauregui A; Castellvi J; Pérez-Benavente A; Colás E; Gil-Moreno A; Cabrera S
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2023 Oct; 33(10):1564-1571. PubMed ID: 37726197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multivariable analysis of DNA ploidy, p53, and HER-2/neu as prognostic factors in endometrial cancer.
Lukes AS; Kohler MF; Pieper CF; Kerns BJ; Bentley R; Rodriguez GC; Soper JT; Clarke-Pearson DL; Bast RC; Berchuck A
Cancer; 1994 May; 73(9):2380-5. PubMed ID: 7909491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Molecular characterization in the prediction of disease extent in endometrial carcinoma.
Kolehmainen AM; Pasanen AM; Koivisto-Korander RL; Bützow RC; Loukovaara MJ
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Jan; 256():478-483. PubMed ID: 33189427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The revised 2009 FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: should the 1988 FIGO stages IA and IB be altered?
Abu-Rustum NR; Zhou Q; Iasonos A; Alektiar KM; Leitao MM; Chi DS; Sonoda Y; Soslow R; Hensley M; Barakat RR
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Apr; 21(3):511-6. PubMed ID: 21436699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Molecular Classification of Grade 3 Endometrioid Endometrial Cancers Identifies Distinct Prognostic Subgroups.
Bosse T; Nout RA; McAlpine JN; McConechy MK; Britton H; Hussein YR; Gonzalez C; Ganesan R; Steele JC; Harrison BT; Oliva E; Vidal A; Matias-Guiu X; Abu-Rustum NR; Levine DA; Gilks CB; Soslow RA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2018 May; 42(5):561-568. PubMed ID: 29505428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical evaluation of a droplet digital PCR assay for detecting
Kim G; Lee SK; Suh DH; Kim K; No JH; Kim YB; Kim H
J Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 33(2):e15. PubMed ID: 34910396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma on diagnostic specimens is highly concordant with final hysterectomy: Earlier prognostic information to guide treatment.
Talhouk A; Hoang LN; McConechy MK; Nakonechny Q; Leo J; Cheng A; Leung S; Yang W; Lum A; Köbel M; Lee CH; Soslow RA; Huntsman DG; Gilks CB; McAlpine JN
Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Oct; 143(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 27421752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
