174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37749202)
41. Robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy: results from Taipei Veterans General Hospital in Taiwan.
Shyr BU; Shyr BS; Chen SC; Shyr YM; Wang SE
Updates Surg; 2021 Jun; 73(3):939-946. PubMed ID: 33068270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Multicenter comparison of totally laparoscopic and totally robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: Propensity score and learning curve-matching analyses.
Kim H; Choi SH; Jang JY; Choi M; Lee JH; Kang CM
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2022 Mar; 29(3):311-321. PubMed ID: 34773395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy with the da Vinci Xi: can the costs of advanced technology be offset by clinical advantages? A case-matched cost analysis versus open approach.
Di Franco G; Lorenzoni V; Palmeri M; Furbetta N; Guadagni S; Gianardi D; Bianchini M; Pollina LE; Melfi F; Mamone D; Milli C; Di Candio G; Turchetti G; Morelli L
Surg Endosc; 2022 Jun; 36(6):4417-4428. PubMed ID: 34708294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Propensity score-matched comparison of the oncological feasibility and survival outcomes for pancreatic adenocarcinoma with robotic and open pancreatoduodenectomy.
Shyr BU; Shyr BS; Chen SC; Shyr YM; Wang SE
Surg Endosc; 2022 Feb; 36(2):1507-1514. PubMed ID: 33770276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Overcoming the Arduous Transition for Robotic Hepatopancreatobiliary Cases: A Multi-Procedure Learning Curve Study Utilizing CUSUM Analysis.
Lim JS; Jackson T; Kurtz J; Cho EE; Vedantam S; Nagatomo K; Osman H; Jeyarajah DR
World J Surg; 2021 Mar; 45(3):865-872. PubMed ID: 33247356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. State of the art of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy.
Napoli N; Kauffmann EF; Vistoli F; Amorese G; Boggi U
Updates Surg; 2021 Jun; 73(3):873-880. PubMed ID: 34014497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. An assessment of perioperative outcomes for open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy in New York State.
Wach MM; Myneni AA; Miller L; Boccardo J; Ibrahim-Zada I; Schwaitzberg SS; Noyes K; Gajdos C
J Surg Oncol; 2022 Dec; 126(8):1434-1441. PubMed ID: 35986891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparison of surgical outcomes among open, laparoscopic, and robotic pancreatoduodenectomy: a single-center retrospective study.
Guo W; Ye X; Li J; Lu S; Wang M; Wang Z; Yao J; Yu S; Yuan G; He S
BMC Surg; 2022 Sep; 22(1):348. PubMed ID: 36138358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Surgical methods influence on the risk of anastomotic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Wang K; Dong SS; Zhang W; Ni YY; Xie F; Wang JC; Wang XH; Li YW
Surg Endosc; 2023 May; 37(5):3380-3397. PubMed ID: 36627536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: surgical and oncological outcomes from pilot experience.
Jin J; Yin SM; Weng Y; Chen M; Shi Y; Ying X; Gemenetzis G; Qin K; Zhang J; Deng X; Peng C; Shen B
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Jun; 407(4):1489-1497. PubMed ID: 35088144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The learning curve for a surgeon in robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study in a high-volume pancreatic center.
Zhang T; Zhao ZM; Gao YX; Lau WY; Liu R
Surg Endosc; 2019 Sep; 33(9):2927-2933. PubMed ID: 30483970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A comparison of outcomes between open, laparoscopic and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Zimmerman AM; Roye DG; Charpentier KP
HPB (Oxford); 2018 Apr; 20(4):364-369. PubMed ID: 29183703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Epidemiology of healthcare-associated infections and outcomes among open and robotic pancreatoduodenectomy: A retrospective study from 2013 to 2022.
Yu ZH; Du MM; Lin L; Liu BW; Bai YL; Liu ML; Li JX; Lu QB; Liu YX; Yao HW
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2023 Dec; 38(12):2238-2246. PubMed ID: 37926431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Effect of Operative Time on Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy.
Williams MD; Bhama AR; Naffouje S; Kamarajah SK; Becerra AZ; Zhang Y; Pappas SG; Dahdaleh FS
J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Jan; 27(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 36357742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Challenge in optimizing robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy including nerve plexus hanging maneuver: a Japanese single center experience of 76 cases.
Mizumoto T; Takahara T; Nishimura A; Mii S; Uchida Y; Iwama H; Kojima M; Kato Y; Uyama I; Suda K
Surg Endosc; 2024 Feb; 38(2):1077-1087. PubMed ID: 38168732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Learning curves for robotic pancreatic surgery-from distal pancreatectomy to pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Shyr BU; Chen SC; Shyr YM; Wang SE
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Nov; 97(45):e13000. PubMed ID: 30407289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy in the era of minimally invasive surgery.
Shyr YM; Wang SE; Chen SC; Shyr BU
J Chin Med Assoc; 2020 Jul; 83(7):639-643. PubMed ID: 32332518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: oncological outcomes.
Nassour I; Choti MA; Porembka MR; Yopp AC; Wang SC; Polanco PM
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jun; 32(6):2907-2913. PubMed ID: 29280014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Chyle leakage after robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Shyr BU; Shyr BS; Chen SC; Shyr YM; Wang SE
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2020 May; 27(5):273-279. PubMed ID: 31971351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Learning Curve From 450 Cases of Robot-Assisted Pancreaticoduocectomy in a High-Volume Pancreatic Center: Optimization of Operative Procedure and a Retrospective Study.
Shi Y; Wang W; Qiu W; Zhao S; Wang J; Weng Y; Huo Z; Jin J; Wang Y; Deng X; Shen B; Peng C
Ann Surg; 2021 Dec; 274(6):e1277-e1283. PubMed ID: 31651533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
