123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37749465)
1. Environmental regulation, green technology progress and haze reduction and carbon reduction.
Zhang Y; Cui X; Liu L
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 May; 31(25):36367-36383. PubMed ID: 37749465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intricate synergistic effects between air pollution and carbon emission: An emerging evidence from China.
Wang Y; Ni J; Xu K; Zhang H; Gong X; He C
Environ Pollut; 2024 May; 349():123851. PubMed ID: 38527582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Governance effects of pollution reduction and carbon mitigation of carbon emission trading policy in China.
Cheng X; Yu Z; Gao J; Liu Y; Jiang S
Environ Res; 2024 Jul; 252(Pt 4):119074. PubMed ID: 38705449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Regional policy synergy and haze governance-empirical evidence from 281 prefecture-level cities in China.
Li J; Ye S
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Mar; 28(9):10763-10779. PubMed ID: 33099756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does technology innovation reduce haze pollution? An empirical study based on urban innovation index in China.
He L; Yuan E; Yang K; Tao D
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Apr; 29(16):24063-24076. PubMed ID: 34822086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of Chinese-style fiscal decentralization in promoting synergistic carbon and haze governance: insights from technological innovation.
Tian J; Huang W; Zhao Z; Peng J
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 May; 31(25):36417-36439. PubMed ID: 37945950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Environmental impact of national and subnational carbon policies in China based on a multi-regional dynamic CGE model.
Zhang WW; Zhao B; Gu Y; Sharp B; Xu SC; Liou KN
J Environ Manage; 2020 Sep; 270():110901. PubMed ID: 32721336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Whether green technology innovation is conducive to haze emission reduction: empirical evidence from China.
Yi M; Lu Y; Wen L; Luo Y; Xu S; Zhang T
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Feb; 29(8):12115-12127. PubMed ID: 34561798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The 2023 Latin America report of the
Hartinger SM; Palmeiro-Silva YK; Llerena-Cayo C; Blanco-Villafuerte L; Escobar LE; Diaz A; Sarmiento JH; Lescano AG; Melo O; Rojas-Rueda D; Takahashi B; Callaghan M; Chesini F; Dasgupta S; Posse CG; Gouveia N; Martins de Carvalho A; Miranda-Chacón Z; Mohajeri N; Pantoja C; Robinson EJZ; Salas MF; Santiago R; Sauma E; Santos-Vega M; Scamman D; Sergeeva M; Souza de Camargo T; Sorensen C; Umaña JD; Yglesias-González M; Walawender M; Buss D; Romanello M
Lancet Reg Health Am; 2024 May; 33():100746. PubMed ID: 38800647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Coordinated effects of energy transition on air pollution mitigation and CO
Yuan R; Ma Q; Zhang Q; Yuan X; Wang Q; Luo C
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Oct; 841():156482. PubMed ID: 35671858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does the EU emissions trading system help reduce PM
Wan L; Wang S; Zang J; Zheng Q; Fang W
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Apr; 29(16):23129-23143. PubMed ID: 34802077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of carbon-biased technological progress on carbon haze coordinated governance: insights from China.
Zhang L; Peng J; Liu J; Huang W
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 May; 31(25):36329-36348. PubMed ID: 37460883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The synergistic reduction effect of PM
Mo B; Hou M; Huo X
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Feb; 31(9):13766-13779. PubMed ID: 38265592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy Alleviate Urban Haze Pollution? Empirical Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China.
Yan J; Zhao J; Yang X; Su X; Wang H; Ran Q; Shen J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Oct; 18(21):. PubMed ID: 34769802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The synergy effect of energy security and carbon-haze collaborative management: From the perspective of biased technological progress.
Zhang C; Yang S
Environ Res; 2024 Jul; 252(Pt 1):118741. PubMed ID: 38522744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How does biased technological progress affect haze pollution? Evidence from APEC economies.
Yang G; Zha D
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Aug; 29(36):54543-54560. PubMed ID: 35304719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How does heterogeneous environmental regulation affect net carbon emissions: Spatial and threshold analysis for China.
Huang X; Tian P
J Environ Manage; 2023 Mar; 330():117161. PubMed ID: 36603254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How informal environmental regulations constrain carbon dioxide emissions under pollution control and carbon reduction: Evidence from China.
Kou P; Han Y; Jin B; Li T
Environ Res; 2024 Jul; 252(Pt 1):118732. PubMed ID: 38518908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How does carbon biased technological progress promote carbon haze collaborative Governance？Evidence from Chinese cities.
Yang B; Wang H; Zhao L; Wang H
Environ Res; 2024 Jun; 257():119312. PubMed ID: 38830393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of natural and socioeconomic factors on haze pollution from global and local perspectives in China.
Cai X; Hu H; Liu C; Tan Z; Zheng S; Qiu S
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jun; 30(26):68356-68372. PubMed ID: 37120500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
