These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37749784)

  • 1. Complications and Failures of Autologous Heterotopic Cranial Bone versus Alloplastic Cranioplasties.
    Oberoi MK; Mirzaie S; Huang KX; Caprini RM; Hu VJ; Dejam D; Ge S; Cronin BJ; Pfaff MJ; Lee JC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Oct; 154(4):757e-772e. PubMed ID: 37749784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes following polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cranioplasty: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Punchak M; Chung LK; Lagman C; Bui TT; Lazareff J; Rezzadeh K; Jarrahy R; Yang I
    J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 41():30-35. PubMed ID: 28377284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Autologous Bone Is Inferior to Alloplastic Cranioplasties: Safety of Autograft and Allograft Materials for Cranioplasties, a Systematic Review.
    van de Vijfeijken SECM; Münker TJAG; Spijker R; Karssemakers LHE; Vandertop WP; Becking AG; Ubbink DT;
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Sep; 117():443-452.e8. PubMed ID: 29879511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer-designed polyetheretherketone implants versus titanium mesh (± acrylic cement) in alloplastic cranioplasty: a retrospective single-surgeon, single-center study.
    Ng ZY; Ang WJ; Nawaz I
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014; 25(2):e185-9. PubMed ID: 24621767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcomes of Cranioplasty Strategies for High-Risk Complex Cranial Defects: A 10-Year Experience.
    Soto E; Restrepo RD; Grant JH; Myers RP
    Ann Plast Surg; 2022 Jun; 88(5 Suppl 5):S449-S454. PubMed ID: 34670972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Leão RS; Maior JRS; Lemos CAA; Vasconcelos BCDE; Montes MAJR; Pellizzer EP; Moraes SLD
    Braz Oral Res; 2018 Jun; 32():e31. PubMed ID: 29898018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors related to failure of autologous cranial reconstructions after decompressive craniectomy.
    van de Vijfeijken SECM; Groot C; Ubbink DT; Vandertop WP; Depauw PRAM; Nout E; Becking AG;
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Sep; 47(9):1420-1425. PubMed ID: 31353299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Translucent Customized Cranial Implants Made of Clear Polymethylmethacrylate: An Early Outcome Analysis of 55 Consecutive Cranioplasty Cases.
    Shay T; Mitchell KA; Belzberg M; Zelko I; Mahapatra S; Qian J; Mendoza L; Huang J; Brem H; Gordon C
    Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Dec; 85(6):e27-e36. PubMed ID: 33170582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term clinical outcome analysis of poly-methyl-methacrylate cranioplasty for large skull defects.
    Jaberi J; Gambrell K; Tiwana P; Madden C; Finn R
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb; 71(2):e81-8. PubMed ID: 23351772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcomes and Complications of Pediatric Cranioplasty: A Systematic Review.
    Abu-Ghname A; Banuelos J; Oliver JD; Vyas K; Daniels D; Sharaf B
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Sep; 144(3):433e-443e. PubMed ID: 31461029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preliminary Results of a Prospective Study on Methods of Cranial Reconstruction.
    Iaccarino C; Viaroli E; Fricia M; Serchi E; Poli T; Servadei F
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 73(12):2375-8. PubMed ID: 26253012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An Outcomes Comparison Between Autologous and Alloplastic Cranioplasty in the Pediatric Population.
    Fu KJ; Barr RM; Kerr ML; Shah MN; Fletcher SA; Sandberg DI; Teichgraeber JF; Greives MR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 May; 27(3):593-7. PubMed ID: 27035597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Customized polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants are associated with similar hospital length of stay compared to autologous bone used in cranioplasty procedures.
    Mozaffari K; Rana S; Chow A; Mahgerefteh N; Duong C; Sheppard JP; Phillips HW; Jarrahy R; Yang I
    J Neurol Sci; 2022 Mar; 434():120169. PubMed ID: 35134672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Perioperative and Long-term Outcomes Following PEEK and Autologous Cranioplasty: A Single Institution Experience and Review of the Literature.
    Anderson B; Harris P; Mozaffari K; Foster CH; Johnson M; Jaco AA; Rosner MK
    World Neurosurg; 2023 Dec; 180():e127-e134. PubMed ID: 37683922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Complications and cosmetic outcomes of materials used in cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy-a systematic review, pairwise meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis.
    Gerstl JVE; Rendon LF; Burke SM; Doucette J; Mekary RA; Smith TR
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2022 Dec; 164(12):3075-3090. PubMed ID: 35593924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcomes of Titanium Mesh Cranioplasty in Pediatric Patients.
    Ma IT; Symon MR; Bristol RE; Beals SP; Joganic EF; Adelson PD; Shafron DH; Singh DJ
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jan; 29(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 29049146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Titanium Versus Autologous Bone-Based Cranioplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Capitelli-McMahon H; Kahlar N; Rahman S
    Cureus; 2023 May; 15(5):e39516. PubMed ID: 37366436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With PEEK Versus Titanium Cranioplasty Reconstruction.
    Asaad M; Taslakian EN; Banuelos J; Abu-Ghname A; Bite U; Mardini S; Van Gompel JJ; Sharaf B
    J Craniofac Surg; 2021 Jan-Feb 01; 32(1):193-197. PubMed ID: 33074970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomised controlled trial comparing autologous cranioplasty with custom-made titanium cranioplasty: long-term follow-up.
    Honeybul S; Morrison DA; Ho KM; Lind CRP; Geelhoed E
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2018 May; 160(5):885-891. PubMed ID: 29546554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring complications following cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy: A retrospective bicenter assessment of autologous, PMMA and CAD implants.
    Pfnür A; Tosin D; Petkov M; Sharon O; Mayer B; Wirtz CR; Knoll A; Pala A
    Neurosurg Rev; 2024 Jan; 47(1):72. PubMed ID: 38285230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.