BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37750213)

  • 1. Logistic regression vs. predictive mean matching for imputing binary covariates.
    Austin PC; van Buuren S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Nov; 32(11):2172-2183. PubMed ID: 37750213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple imputation methods for handling missing values in a longitudinal categorical variable with restrictions on transitions over time: a simulation study.
    De Silva AP; Moreno-Betancur M; De Livera AM; Lee KJ; Simpson JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):14. PubMed ID: 30630434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Imputation strategies when a continuous outcome is to be dichotomized for responder analysis: a simulation study.
    Floden L; Bell ML
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):161. PubMed ID: 31345166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of methods for imputing ordinal data using multivariate normal imputation: a case study of non-linear effects in a large cohort study.
    Lee KJ; Galati JC; Simpson JA; Carlin JB
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4164-74. PubMed ID: 22826110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of high prevalence of missing data on estimation of the coefficients of a logistic regression model when using multiple imputation.
    Austin PC; van Buuren S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jul; 22(1):196. PubMed ID: 35850734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A wide range of missing imputation approaches in longitudinal data: a simulation study and real data analysis.
    Jahangiri M; Kazemnejad A; Goldfeld KS; Daneshpour MS; Mostafaei S; Khalili D; Moghadas MR; Akbarzadeh M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jul; 23(1):161. PubMed ID: 37415114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiple imputation of semi-continuous exposure variables that are categorized for analysis.
    Nguyen CD; Moreno-Betancur M; Rodwell L; Romaniuk H; Carlin JB; Lee KJ
    Stat Med; 2021 Nov; 40(27):6093-6106. PubMed ID: 34423450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cox regression analysis with missing covariates via nonparametric multiple imputation.
    Hsu CH; Yu M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jun; 28(6):1676-1688. PubMed ID: 29717943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple imputation in the presence of an incomplete binary variable created from an underlying continuous variable.
    Grobler AC; Lee K
    Biom J; 2020 Mar; 62(2):467-478. PubMed ID: 31304611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of random forest and parametric imputation models for imputing missing data using MICE: a CALIBER study.
    Shah AD; Bartlett JW; Carpenter J; Nicholas O; Hemingway H
    Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Mar; 179(6):764-74. PubMed ID: 24589914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiple imputation for handling missing outcome data when estimating the relative risk.
    Sullivan TR; Lee KJ; Ryan P; Salter AB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):134. PubMed ID: 28877666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tuning multiple imputation by predictive mean matching and local residual draws.
    Morris TP; White IR; Royston P
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Jun; 14():75. PubMed ID: 24903709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Imputation strategies for missing binary outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
    Ma J; Akhtar-Danesh N; Dolovich L; Thabane L;
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Feb; 11():18. PubMed ID: 21324148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of methods for imputing limited-range variables: a simulation study.
    Rodwell L; Lee KJ; Romaniuk H; Carlin JB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Apr; 14():57. PubMed ID: 24766825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Solving the many-variables problem in MICE with principal component regression.
    Costantini E; Lang KM; Sijtsma K; Reeskens T
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):1715-1737. PubMed ID: 37540467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Comparison of Imputation Strategies for Ordinal Missing Data on Likert Scale Variables.
    Wu W; Jia F; Enders C
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(5):484-503. PubMed ID: 26610248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A fair comparison of tree-based and parametric methods in multiple imputation by chained equations.
    Slade E; Naylor MG
    Stat Med; 2020 Apr; 39(8):1156-1166. PubMed ID: 31997388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiple imputation in the presence of non-normal data.
    Lee KJ; Carlin JB
    Stat Med; 2017 Feb; 36(4):606-617. PubMed ID: 27862164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiple imputation for non-response when estimating HIV prevalence using survey data.
    Chinomona A; Mwambi H
    BMC Public Health; 2015 Oct; 15():1059. PubMed ID: 26475303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiple imputation by chained equations for systematically and sporadically missing multilevel data.
    Resche-Rigon M; White IR
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Jun; 27(6):1634-1649. PubMed ID: 27647809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.